IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v73y2020i2p3-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does a universal non‐contributory social pension make sense for rural China?

Author

Listed:
  • Ce Shen
  • Jessica Johnson
  • Zhenhe Chi
  • John B. Williamson

Abstract

China’s pension reform during the past three decades has allowed a majority of China’s population to be covered by a pension scheme. Of particular note has been the New Rural Pension Scheme (NRPS), a voluntary programme introduced starting in 2009. One goal of our analysis is to assess that pension scheme, using a variety of sources of information including data drawn from recent (2013 and 2015) nationwide China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Surveys (CHARLS). Our analysis involves an exploration of differences between the generosity and structure of the NRPS and other pension schemes currently in place. We also explore the feasibility of reforming the current “quasi‐social pension” component of the NRPS by substituting a universal non‐contributory social pension pillar. In connection with our assessment of the NRPS, we note the unusually low benefit levels for rural China. Au cours des trente dernières années, la réforme des pensions en Chine a permis à la majorité de la population d’être couverte par un régime de pension. Dans ce contexte, nous avons en particulier analysé le nouveau régime de pension rural (NRPR), un programme volontaire introduit à partir de 2009. L’un des objectifs de notre analyse est d’évaluer ce régime de pension, à l’aide de diverses sources d'information, y compris des données tirées des récentes enquêtes longitudinales sur la santé et l’emploi en Chine menées en 2013 et 2015 dans l’ensemble du pays. Nous analysons notamment les différences entre la générosité des indemnités et la structure du NRPR ainsi que d’autres régimes de pension d’ores et déjà mis en place. Nous étudions par ailleurs la possibilité de réformer l’actuelle composante de «pension quasi‐sociale» du NRPR en intégrant un pilier de pension sociale universelle non contributive. Dans le cadre de notre analyse du NRPR, nous constatons un niveau des allocations inhabituellement bas pour la Chine rurale. La reforma de las pensiones realizada en China en las últimas tres décadas ha permitido cubrir a la mayoría de la población de China con un régimen de pensiones. En este contexto destacamos el nuevo Régimen de Pensiones Rurales (RPR), programa voluntario introducido en 2009. Uno de los objetivos de nuestro análisis es evaluar dicho régimen utilizandoa diversas fuentes de información, incluidos datos extraídos de recientes encuestas longitudinales sobre salud y jubilación realizadas en China en 2013 y 2015. En nuestro análisis estudiamos las diferencias entre la generosidad y la estructura del RPR y otros regímenes de pensiones existentes. También examinamos la posibilidad de reformar el actual componente de pensión “casi social” del RPR sustituyéndolo por un pilar de pensión social universal no contributivo. En el marco de nuestra evaluación observamos unos niveles de prestaciones inusualmente bajos para la China rural. Chinas Rentenreform hat es in den letzten drei Jahrzehnten ermöglicht, die Mehrheit der Bevölkerung Rentensystemen zu unterstellen. Besonders bemerkenswert ist das Neue ländliche Rentensystem (New Rural Pension Scheme, NRPS), ein freiwilliges Programm, das seit 2009 besteht. Ein Ziel unserer Analyse ist es, dieses Rentensystem gestützt auf eine Vielfalt von Informationsquellen, darunter Daten aus jüngsten (2013 und 2015) landesweiten Langzeiterhebungen über Gesundheit und Renten in China (China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Surveys, CHARLS), zu beurteilen. Unsere Analyse untersucht die Unterschiede bei Großzügigkeit und Struktur zwischen dem NRPS und anderen heute bestehenden Rentensystemen. Wir prüfen auch die Reformierbarkeit der aktuellen „Quasi‐Sozialrenten“‐Komponente des NRPS durch deren Ersatz durch eine universelle nicht‑beitragsfinanzierte Sozialrentensäule. In Verbindung mit unserer Beurteilung des NRPS stellen wir fest, dass die Rentenniveaus im ländlichen China ungewöhnlich niedrig sind. За последние тридцать лет китайская пенсионная реформа позволила включить в пенсионную программу большинство населения страны. Особенно стоит отметить внедрённую в 2009 г. Новую пенсионную программу для сельского населения (New Rural Pension Scheme ─ NRPS), которая предусматривает добровольное участие. Её оценка является одной из целей нашего анализа, проводимого на основании многих источников информации, в том числе и национальном лонгитюдном исследовании по вопросам здравоохранения и пенсионной системы Китая (China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Surveys ─ CHARLS) за 2013 и 2015 гг. В работе изучено отличия между выплатами и структурой Новой пенсионной программы для сельского населения и другими действующими пенсионными системами. Также рассмотрено возможность реформирования ныне используемой в этой программе «псевдосоциальной пенсии» и замены её на всеобщую безвзносовую социальную пенсию. По результатам оценки NRPS можно сделать выводы о необычно низком уровне выплат сельскому населению Китая. 中国过去30年的养老金改革让大部分的中国人获得养老金制度的保障。特别值得一提的是2009 年推出的被称为“新型农村社会养老保险”(简称新农保)的一项自愿性计划。我们的分析目的之一, 是利用取自多个来源的资料来评估这项养老金方案。这些资料包括取自近期在全中国进行的中国健康与养老追踪调查(2013 与 2015 年)的数据。我们的分析涉及探讨新农保与其它现行养老金方案之间在慷慨度与结构上的差异。我们还探讨了通过替代普惠制非缴费性社会养老金部分从而改革新农保现行“准社会养老金”的可行性。在对新农保进行评估时, 我们注意到了中国农村异常低的福利水平。 سمحت الإصلاحات التي أُجريت على نظام المعاشات التقاعدية في الصين خلال العقود الثلاثة السابقة لأغلبية السكان في الصين بالاستفادة من التغطية بخطة المعاشات التقاعدية. ومن الملاحظ بوجه خاص إدراج الخطة الجديدة للمعاشات التقاعدية في المناطق الريفية، وهو برنامج طوعي أُدرج في بداية عام 2009. ومن أهداف هذا التحليل تقييم خطة المعاشات التقاعدية هذه باستخدام مجموعة متنوعة من مصادر المعلومات بما فيها البيانات الأخيرة (2013 و2015) المستمدة من الدراسات الاستقصائية الطولانية التي أُجريت في جميع أرجاء الصين بشأن الصحة والتقاعد في الصين. واستعرضنا في دراستنا الفروق بين سخاء خطة المعاشات التقاعدية في المناطق الريفية وهيكلها وغيرها من الخطط القائمة حالياً. كما استعرضنا مدى إمكانية إصلاح عنصر "المعاشات التقاعدية الشبه اجتماعية" في خطة المعاشات التقاعدية في المناطق الريفية من خلال استبداله بركيزة امعاشات تقاعدية اجتماعية شاملة غير قائمة على الاشتراكات. ولاحظنا، لدى تقييمنا لخطة المعاشات التقاعدية في المناطق الريفية، أن مستويات المنافع منخفضة بشكل كبير في المناطق الريفية في الصين. A reforma previdenciária na China ao longo das últimas três décadas possibilitou que a maioria da população chinesa fosse coberta por um regime previdenciário. Destaca‐se o novo regime rural de previdência (NRPS, New Rural Pension Scheme), programa voluntário introduzido a partir de 2009. Um objetivo da nossa análise é avaliar esse regime previdenciário, a partir de diversas fontes de informação, entre as quais dados recentes (2013 e 2015), extraídos de pesquisas longitudinais em saúde e aposentadoria na China (CHARLS, China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Surveys) em âmbito nacional. A nossa análise estuda as diferenças entre a generosidade e a estrutura do NRPS e outros regimes previdenciários atualmente em vigor. Também exploramos a viabilidade de reformar o atual componente “quase social da aposentadoria” do NRPS e substituí‐lo por um pilar universal de aposentadoria social não‐contributiva. Aliada à nossa avaliação dos NRPS, observamos os níveis de benefícios incomumente baixos para a China rural.

Suggested Citation

  • Ce Shen & Jessica Johnson & Zhenhe Chi & John B. Williamson, 2020. "Does a universal non‐contributory social pension make sense for rural China?," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 73(2), pages 3-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:73:y:2020:i:2:p:3-26
    DOI: 10.1111/issr.12233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12233
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/issr.12233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedro Rodrigues de Oliveira & Ana Lúcia Kassouf, 2013. "Impacts of the Continuous Cash Benefit Programme on Family Welfare," One Pager 192, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    2. Javier Olivera & Blanca Zuluaga, 2014. "The Ex‐Ante Effects Of Non‐Contributory Pensions In Colombia And Peru," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(7), pages 949-973, October.
    3. Lu, Bei & He, Wenjiong & Piggott, John, 2014. "Should China introduce a social pension?," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 76-87.
    4. Huamao Zheng & Teng Zhong, 2016. "The impacts of social pension on rural household expenditure: evidence from China," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 221-237, July.
    5. Huamao Zheng & Teng Zhong, 2016. "The impacts of social pension on rural household expenditure: evidence from China," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 221-237, July.
    6. Tobias Pfutze & Carlos Rodríguez-Castelán, 2019. "Can a Small Social Pension Promote Labor Force Participation? Evidence from the Colombia Mayor Program," Economía Journal, The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA, vol. 0(Fall 2019), pages 111-154, October.
    7. Cheng, Lingguo & Liu, Hong & Zhang, Ye & Zhao, Zhong, 2018. "The health implications of social pensions: Evidence from China's new rural pension scheme," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 53-77.
    8. Sebastian Levine & Servaas van der Berg & Derek Yu, 2011. "The impact of cash transfers on household welfare in Namibia," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 39-59.
    9. Winnie Mwasiaji, 2015. "Scaling up Cash Transfer Programmes in Kenya," One Pager 286, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    10. Suwanrada, Worawet & Sukontamarn, Pataporn & Bangkaew, Busarin, 2018. "Who supports intergenerational redistribution policy? Evidence from old-age allowance system in Thailand," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 24-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing You & Miguel Niño‐Zarazúa, 2019. "The Intergenerational Impact of China's New Rural Pension Scheme," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(S1), pages 47-95, December.
    2. Xing Ji & Jingwen Xu & Hongxiao Zhang, 2022. "How Does China’s New Rural Pension Scheme Affect Agricultural Production?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Tongwei Xie & Changjiang Xiong & Qing Xu & Tianshu Zhou, 2022. "The Impact of Social Pension Scheme on Farm Production in China: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Kang, Ji Young & Park, Sojung & Ahn, Seoyeon, 2022. "The effect of social pension on consumption among older adults in Korea," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    5. José Luis Iparraguirre, 2020. "Economics and Ageing," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-29019-1, December.
    6. Jing You & Miguel Niño-Zarazúa, 2017. "Smoothing or strengthening the 'Great Gatsby curve'?: The intergenerational impact of China's New Rural Pension Scheme," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-199, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Tan, Jing & Xu, Hao & Yu, Jingwen, 2022. "The effect of homeownership on migrant household savings: Evidence from the removal of home purchase restrictions in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Yanjun Ren & Weigang Liu & Xuexi Huo & Thomas Glauben, 2023. "The impact of old‐age pension on nutritional outcomes: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(S1), pages 1358-1381, December.
    9. Jing You & Miguel Niño-Zarazúa, 2017. "Smoothing or strengthening the ‘Great Gatsby Curve’? The intergenerational impact of China’s New Rural Pension Scheme," WIDER Working Paper Series 199, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Gemma Wright & Michael Noble & David McLennan & Michell Mpike, 2016. "Updating NAMOD: A Namibian tax-benefit microsimulation model," WIDER Working Paper Series 143, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Pak, Tae-Young, 2020. "Social protection for happiness? The impact of social pension reform on subjective well-being of the Korean elderly," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 349-366.
    12. Bando, Rosangela & Galiani, Sebastian & Gertler, Paul, 2022. "Another brick on the wall: On the effects of non-contributory pensions on material and subjective well being," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 16-26.
    13. Zhaohua Zhang & Yuxi Luo & Derrick Robinson, 2018. "Reducing Food Poverty and Vulnerability among the Rural Elderly with Chronic Diseases: The Role of the New Rural Pension Scheme in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Nikolov, Plamen & Bonci, Matthew, 2020. "Do public program benefits crowd out private transfers in developing countries? A critical review of recent evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Zang, Emma, 2020. "Spillover effects of a husband's retirement on a woman's health: Evidence from urban China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    16. Chen, Xi & Wang, Tianyu & Busch, Susan H., 2019. "Does money relieve depression? Evidence from social pension expansions in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 411-420.
    17. Pauline Rossi & Mathilde Godard, 2022. "The Old-Age Security Motive for Fertility: Evidence from the Extension of Social Pensions in Namibia," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 488-518, November.
    18. Sipei Xu & Jia Zhang, 2022. "Do Social Pensions Affect the Physical and Mental Health of Rural Children in China? An Intergenerational Care Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-25, March.
    19. Xu, Hui & Zhang, Zheyuan & Zhao, Zhong, 2023. "Parental socioeconomic status and children’s cognitive ability in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Ortiz, Isabel, & Durán Valverde, Fabio. & Pal, Karuna. & Behrendt, Christina. & Acuña-Ulate, Andrés., 2017. "Universal social protection floors : costing estimates and affordability in 57 lower income countries," ILO Working Papers 994972593502676, International Labour Organization.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:73:y:2020:i:2:p:3-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.