IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v10y2020i4p678-702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance comparison of a natural gas and renewable‐based power and desalination system for polygeneration

Author

Listed:
  • Houd Al‐Obaidli
  • Yusuf Bicer
  • Tareq Al‐Ansari

Abstract

Conventional district energy supply (DES) systems have relatively lower efficiencies when compared to polygeneration systems. The use of fossil fuels as a primary energy source in DES generates high levels of CO2 emissions, degrading their environmental performance. On the other hand, renewable energy systems are generally integrated into the energy portfolio mix to improve the overall efficiency and sustainability, whilst curbing the overall greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this study, an alternative renewable energy polygeneration system design based on biomass and solar energy is proposed. A thermodynamic analysis of the system was carried out, and the energetic and exergetic efficiencies were subsequently compared against the reference case. The results indicate that the alternative system only demonstrates slightly improved efficiencies over the reference system on the basis of cogeneration. However, when implemented for polygeneration, the alternative system offers a clear advantage with estimated energy and exergy efficiencies of 62.9% and 41.9%, respectively. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Houd Al‐Obaidli & Yusuf Bicer & Tareq Al‐Ansari, 2020. "Performance comparison of a natural gas and renewable‐based power and desalination system for polygeneration," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(4), pages 678-702, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:678-702
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1966
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.1966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El-Emam, Rami Salah & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2014. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyses of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant with energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 154-163.
    2. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2013. "Development and assessment of an integrated biomass-based multi-generation energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 155-166.
    3. Sara Ghaem Sigarchian & Anders Malmquist & Viktoria Martin, 2018. "Design Optimization of a Small-Scale Polygeneration Energy System in Different Climate Zones in Iran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anahita Moharamian & Saeed Soltani & Faramarz Ranjbar & Mortaza Yari & Marc A Rosen, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis of a wall mounted gas boiler with an organic Rankine cycle and hydrogen production unit," Energy & Environment, , vol. 28(7), pages 725-743, November.
    2. khanmohammadi, Shoaib & Saadat-Targhi, Morteza, 2019. "Performance enhancement of an integrated system with solar flat plate collector for hydrogen production using waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1066-1076.
    3. Sikarwar, Shailesh Singh & Surywanshi, Gajanan Dattarao & Patnaikuni, Venkata Suresh & Kakunuri, Manohar & Vooradi, Ramsagar, 2020. "Chemical looping combustion integrated Organic Rankine Cycled biomass-fired power plant – Energy and exergy analyses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 931-949.
    4. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2014. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a novel biomass-based integrated energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 958-970.
    5. Al Moussawi, Houssein & Fardoun, Farouk & Louahlia, Hasna, 2017. "Selection based on differences between cogeneration and trigeneration in various prime mover technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 491-511.
    6. Alipour, Mehran & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Asadi, Mostafa, 2023. "Investigation of energy, exergy, and economy of co-generation system of solar electricity and cooling using linear parabolic collector for a data center," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Kramer, Matthias & Terheiden, Kristina & Wieprecht, Silke, 2015. "Optimized design of impulse turbines in the micro-hydro sector concerning air detrainment processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2604-2613.
    8. Mehrenjani, Javad Rezazadeh & Gharehghani, Ayat & Ahmadi, Samareh & Powell, Kody M., 2023. "Dynamic simulation of a triple-mode multi-generation system assisted by heat recovery and solar energy storage modules: Techno-economic optimization using machine learning approaches," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    9. Touati, Khaled & Rahaman, Md. Saifur, 2020. "Viability of pressure-retarded osmosis for harvesting energy from salinity gradients," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Yang, Kun & Xu, Zi-Long & Fu, Chao, 2015. "Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated CCHP system with biomass air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 317-327.
    11. Yu, Haoshui & Eason, John & Biegler, Lorenz T. & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous heat integration and techno-economic optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for multiple waste heat stream recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 322-333.
    12. Habib Ben Bacha & Abdelkader Saad Abdullah & Mutabe Aljaghtham & Reda S. Salama & Mohamed Abdelgaied & Abd Elnaby Kabeel, 2023. "Thermo-Economic Assessment of Photovoltaic/Thermal Pan-Els-Powered Reverse Osmosis Desalination Unit Combined with Preheating Using Geothermal Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Buonomano, Annamaria & Calise, Francesco & Ferruzzi, Gabriele & Palombo, Adolfo, 2015. "Molten carbonate fuel cell: An experimental analysis of a 1kW system fed by landfill gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 146-160.
    14. Fidelis. I. Abam & Ogheneruona E. Diemuodeke & Ekwe. B. Ekwe & Mohammed Alghassab & Olusegun D. Samuel & Zafar A. Khan & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Farooq, 2020. "Exergoeconomic and Environmental Modeling of Integrated Polygeneration Power Plant with Biomass-Based Syngas Supplemental Firing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Alijanpour sheshpoli, Mohamad & Mousavi Ajarostaghi, Seyed Soheil & Delavar, Mojtaba Aghajani, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from a 1180 kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system by Recuperative organic Rankine cycle (RORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 353-366.
    16. Crivellari, Anna & Cozzani, Valerio & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2019. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of novel methanol synthesis processes driven by offshore renewable energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Francesco Calise & Massimo Dentice D'Accadia & Antonio Piacentino & Maria Vicidomini, 2015. "Thermoeconomic Optimization of a Renewable Polygeneration System Serving a Small Isolated Community," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, January.
    18. Kang, Lixia & Tang, Jianping & Liu, Yongzhong, 2020. "Optimal design of an organic Rankine cycle system considering the expected variations on heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Anvari, Simin & Khalilarya, Sharam & Zare, V., 2018. "Exergoeconomic and environmental analysis of a novel configuration of solar-biomass hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 776-789.
    20. Mauro Villarini & Vera Marcantonio & Andrea Colantoni & Enrico Bocci, 2019. "Sensitivity Analysis of Different Parameters on the Performance of a CHP Internal Combustion Engine System Fed by a Biomass Waste Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:678-702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.