IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wfo/monber/y2007i11p893-907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energieverbrauch und CO2-Emissionen in Österreich. Die Rolle von Energieeffizienz und Energieträgersubstitution

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt Kratena
  • Ina Meyer

Abstract

Zur Erreichung des "Kyoto-Ziels" einer Verringerung der CO2-Emissionen gegenüber dem Referenzjahr 1990 um 13% im Durchschnitt 2008/2012 ist eine signifikante Steigerung der Energieeffizienz in den Sektoren Industrie, Verkehr und private Haushalte erforderlich. Im Zeitraum 1990 bis 2005 reichte die Verbesserung der Energieeffizienz nicht aus, um die emissionssteigernden Effekte des Wachstums von Produktion (Industrie), Pkw-Bestand und Gütertransportleistung (Verkehr) sowie der gesamten Wohnfläche (Haushalte) in Bezug auf den fossilen Energieverbrauch wettzumachen. In der Industrie und den privaten Haushalten hatte die Abnahme der Emissionsintensität (Emissionen pro Energieeinheit) aufgrund einer Verschiebung des Energieträger-Mix (Energieträgersubstitution) einen emissionsdämpfenden Effekt.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt Kratena & Ina Meyer, 2007. "Energieverbrauch und CO2-Emissionen in Österreich. Die Rolle von Energieeffizienz und Energieträgersubstitution," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 80(11), pages 893-907, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2007:i:11:p:893-907
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/30423
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ina Meyer, 2007. "Nachhaltige Mobilität und Klimaökonomie," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 80(4), pages 375-388, April.
    2. Kurt Kratena, 2007. "Technical Change, Investment and Energy Intensity," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 295-314.
    3. Welsch, Heinz & Ochsen, Carsten, 2005. "The determinants of aggregate energy use in West Germany: factor substitution, technological change, and trade," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 93-111, January.
    4. Gilbert E. Metcalf, 2006. "Energy Conservation in the United States: Understanding its Role in Climate Policy," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0609, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    5. Kurt Kratena & Michael Wüger, 2006. "PROMETEUS: Ein multisektorales makroökonomisches Modell der österreichischen Wirtschaft," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 79(3), pages 187-205, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kurt Kratena & Ina Meyer & Michael Wüger, 2009. "Ökonomische, technologische und soziodemographische Einflussfaktoren der Energienachfrage," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 82(7), pages 525-538, July.
    2. Holzmann, Angela & Adensam, Heidelinde & Kratena, Kurt & Schmid, Erwin, 2013. "Decomposing final energy use for heating in the residential sector in Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 607-616.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wurlod, Jules-Daniel & Noailly, Joëlle, 2018. "The impact of green innovation on energy intensity: An empirical analysis for 14 industrial sectors in OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 47-61.
    2. Fan, Maoqing & Zheng, Haitao, 2019. "The impact of factor price changes and technological progress on the energy intensity of China's industries: Kalman filter-based econometric method," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 340-353.
    3. Patrick Schulte & Heinz Welsch & Sascha Rexhäuser, 2016. "ICT and the Demand for Energy: Evidence from OECD Countries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(1), pages 119-146, January.
    4. Dong Hee Suh, 2015. "Declining Energy Intensity in the U.S. Agricultural Sector: Implications for Factor Substitution and Technological Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Suh, Dong Hee, 2015. "Identifying Factor Substitution and Energy Intensity in the U.S. Agricultural Sector," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205264, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Arik Levinson, 2009. "Technology, International Trade, and Pollution from US Manufacturing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(5), pages 2177-2192, December.
    7. Tobias Maier & Anke M�nnig & Gerd Zika, 2015. "Labour Demand In Germany By Industrial Sector, Occupational Field And Qualification Until 2025 - Model Calculations Using The Iab/Inforge Model," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 19-42, March.
    8. Axenbeck, Janna & Niebel, Thomas, 2021. "Climate Protection Potentials of Digitalized Production Processes: Microeconometric Evidence," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238007, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    9. Ang, B.W. & Liu, N., 2006. "A cross-country analysis of aggregate energy and carbon intensities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(15), pages 2398-2404, October.
    10. Hossein Mirshojaeian Hosseini & Shinji Kaneko, 2013. "Fuel Conservation Effect of Energy Subsidy Reform in Iran," Working Papers 3-1, Faculty of Economics,University of Tehran.Tehran,Iran.
    11. Wang, Feng & Liu, Xiying & Nguyen, Tue Anh, 2018. "Evaluating the economic impacts and feasibility of China's energy cap: Based on an Analytic General Equilibrium Model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 114-126.
    12. Song, Malin & Wang, Shuhong, 2016. "Can employment structure promote environment-biased technical progress?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 285-292.
    13. Khayyat, Nabaz T. & Heshmati, Almas, 2014. "Production Risk, Energy Use Efficiency and Productivity of Korean Industries," IZA Discussion Papers 8081, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Zhu, Shu & Xu, Xin & Ren, Xiaojing & Sun, Tianhua & Oxley, Les & Rae, Allan & Ma, Hengyun, 2016. "Modeling technological bias and factor input behavior in China's wheat production sector," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 245-253.
    15. Mirshojaeian Hosseini , Hossein & Majed , Vahid & Kaneko , Shinji, 2015. "The Effects of Energy Subsidy Reform on Fuel Demand in Iran," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 10(2), pages 23-47, January.
    16. repec:rri:wpaper:200705 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Ma, Hengyun & Oxley, Les & Gibson, John & Kim, Bonggeun, 2008. "China's energy economy: Technical change, factor demand and interfactor/interfuel substitution," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 2167-2183, September.
    18. P. Chintrakarn, 2013. "Subnational trade flows and state-level energy intensity: an empirical analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(14), pages 1344-1351, September.
    19. Dargahi, Hassan & Khameneh, Kazem Biabany, 2019. "Energy intensity determinants in an energy-exporting developing economy: Case of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1031-1044.
    20. Yvonne Wolfmayr & Kurt Kratena & Peter Mayerhofer & Jan Stankovsky, 2006. "Teilstudie 13: Exporte von Waren und Dienstleistungen stärken die Nachfrage," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 27452, April.
    21. Shahiduzzaman, Md. & Alam, Khorshed, 2013. "Changes in energy efficiency in Australia: A decomposition of aggregate energy intensity using logarithmic mean Divisia approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 341-351.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2007:i:11:p:893-907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.