IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v13y2019i1p347-360n31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the internet banking adoption factors in the Romanian market

Author

Listed:
  • Ganciu Mihaela-Rodica

    (Energomontaj S.A., Bucharest, Romania)

  • Neghină Ramona-Alexandra

    (Webecom S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mănescu Valentin-Andrei

    (Webecom S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania)

  • Simion Petronela-Cristina

    (University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Militaru Gheorghe

    (University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Online banking services create a way to reduce costs, attracting new segments of population and growing the bank performance and improvement of services. Client’s satisfaction is the main benefits of the banks. The aim of the paper is to investigate and to analyze the factors that influence the adoption of internet banking system in Romania. One of the problems faced by consumers using Internet banking is confidentiality. This makes security in transactions to be essential. For this, the main objectives are: identifying critical factors that contribute to the acceptance of internet banking system and the link between them and also identifying the demographic factors that influence the adoption of this system in Romania. The data collection was done by a quantitative research using the questionnaire method as a survey tool and it was made up of questions measured using the Likert scale. It contains variables based on the construct’s relevance to Internet Banking. All assumptions about the relationship between dependent variables and independent variables are developed and tested using multiple reliability, validity, and regression. It was used a statistical software and with it were analised 6 independent variables, named social influence, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived risk, perceived confidence and intention to use Internet banking. The attitude toward using Internet banking system will be the dependent variable. To verify the acceptability model’s validity, it was used the Structural Equations Model. The results are partly supported by the developed hypotheses and are presented after the reliability test where Cronbach’s Alpha is calculated suggesting the internal reliability of the consistency for the scale. The significant effect that influences the attitude toward using Internet banking system is represented by the perceived usefulness, the perceived risk, the perceived confidence and the intention to use internet banking.

Suggested Citation

  • Ganciu Mihaela-Rodica & Neghină Ramona-Alexandra & Mănescu Valentin-Andrei & Simion Petronela-Cristina & Militaru Gheorghe, 2019. "Understanding the internet banking adoption factors in the Romanian market," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 347-360, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:347-360:n:31
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2019-0031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2019-0031
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2019-0031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jon Hartwick & Henri Barki, 1994. "Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 440-465, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hwang, ShinYoung & Kim Seongcheol, 2017. "What triggers the use of mIM service provider’s sequel O2O service extensions?," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168494, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Anthony Simonofski & Estefanía Serral Asensio & Johannes Smedt & Monique Snoeck, 2019. "Hearing the Voice of Citizens in Smart City Design: The CitiVoice Framework," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 665-678, December.
    3. Vishal K. Gupta & Suman Niranjan & Banu A. Goktan & John Eriskon, 2016. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation role in shaping reactions to new technologies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 935-961, December.
    4. Wang, Guoqiang & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Yuan, Yunpeng & Ooi, Keng-Boon & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "Revisiting TAM2 in behavioral targeting advertising: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Akansha Mer & Amarpreet Singh Virdi, 2023. "Modeling Millennials’ Adoption Intentions of E-banking: Extending UTAUT with Perceived Risk and Trust," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 12(4), pages 425-438, December.
    6. Menti, Federica & Romero, David & Jacobsen, Peter, 2023. "A technology assessment and implementation model for evaluating socio-cultural and technical factors for the successful deployment of Logistics 4.0 technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Hongping Yuan & Yu Yang & Xiaolong Xue, 2019. "Promoting Owners’ BIM Adoption Behaviors to Achieve Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Yanqing Song & Han Bao & Shan Shen, 2022. "Understanding the Influence of Initial Values of College Students in Shaping Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Walker, Daniel H., 2002. "Decision support, learning and rural resource management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 113-127, July.
    10. Arun Rai & Sandra S. Lang & Robert B. Welker, 2002. "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 50-69, March.
    11. Lui, Ariel K.H. & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2023. "A tough pill to swallow? The lessons learned from mandatory RFID adoption," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    12. Foshay, Neil & Kuziemsky, Craig, 2014. "Towards an implementation framework for business intelligence in healthcare," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 20-27.
    13. Moreno Cegarra, José Luis & Cegarra Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Córdoba Pachón, José Rodrigo, 2014. "Applying the technology acceptance model to a Spanish City Hall," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 437-445.
    14. Tomasz Lis & Aleksandra Ptak & Marek Lis, 2021. "Trust as an Element of the Functioning of the Information System in Management in Conditions of Forced Remote Work," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Dorina Gjipali, 2016. "Migration as an Early European Reality," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, May - Aug.
    16. Sanghyun Kim & Gary Garrison, 2009. "Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption: An extension of the technology acceptance model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 323-333, July.
    17. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    18. Shui-Lien Chen & June-Hong Chen & Yung Hsin Lee, 2018. "A Comparison of Competing Models for Understanding Industrial Organization’s Acceptance of Cloud Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Mauricio S. Featherman & Nick Hajli, 2016. "Self-Service Technologies and e-Services Risks in Social Commerce Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 251-269, December.
    20. Laurie J. Kirsch & V. Sambamurthy & Dong-Gil Ko & Russell L. Purvis, 2002. "Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 484-498, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:347-360:n:31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.