Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Mandatory Disclosure and Stock Returns: Evidence from the Over-the-Counter Market

Contents:

Author Info

  • Allen Ferrell
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Mandatory disclosure requirements placed on publicly traded firms constitute the core of U.S. securities regulation. Despite their importance, few empirical studies have been done on the impact of mandatory disclosure requirements on the capital markets. Using a unique database created for this study, this paper examines the impact of the 1964 imposition of mandatory disclosure requirements on the over-the-counter (OTC) market in terms of volatility and stock returns. The effect of the 1964 regulatory change has never been examined prior to this paper, despite its being the only fundamental change in disclosure regulation since the original 1930s securities acts. This study finds that mandatory disclosure is associated with both a dramatic reduction in the volatility of OTC stock returns and with OTC stocks enjoying positive abnormal returns.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/resolve?id=doi:10.1086/511898
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by University of Chicago Press in its journal The Journal of Legal Studies.

    Volume (Year): 36 (2007)
    Issue (Month): 2 (06)
    Pages: 213-251

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:36:y:2007:p:213-251

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS/

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Dhammika Dharmapala & Vikramaditya Khanna, 2014. "The Costs and Benefits of Mandatory Securities Regulation: Evidence from Market Reactions to the JOBS Act of 2012," CESifo Working Paper Series 4796, CESifo Group Munich.
    2. Battalio, Robert & Hatch, Brian & Loughran, Tim, 2011. "Who benefited from the disclosure mandates of the 1964 Securities Acts Amendments?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 1047-1063, September.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:36:y:2007:p:213-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.