This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

An Economic Model of Legal Discovery

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Cooter, Robert D
Rubinfeld, Daniel L
Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by University of Chicago Press in its journal Journal of Legal Studies.

Volume (Year): 23 (1994)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Pages: 435-63
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:23:y:1994:i:1:p:435-63

Contact details of provider:
Postal: The University of Chicago Press, Journals Division, P.O. Box 37005 Chicago, IL 60637
Fax: (773) 753-0811
Email:
Web page: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS/

Order Information:
Web: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS/order1.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Joel Waldfogel, 1998. "Reconciling Asymmetric Information and Divergent Expectations Theories of Litigation," NBER Working Papers 6409, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. Jeong-Yoo Kim & Keunkwan Ryu, 2002. "Sanctions in Pre-Trial Discovery," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 45-60, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Garey Ramey & Joel Watson, 1999. "Contractual Intermediaries," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series 1997-26R, Department of Economics, UC San Diego. [Downloadable!]
  4. Jesse Bull, 2006. "Costly Evidence Production and the Limits of Verifiability," Working Papers 0611, Florida International University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  5. Jesse Bull, 2006. "Costly Evidence and Systems of Fact Finding," Working Papers 0612, Florida International University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. repec:bep:eapcon:v:3:y:2004:i:1:p:1202-1202 is not listed on IDEAS
  7. Garey Ramey & Joel Watson, 1999. "Contractual Intermediaries," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1235, Cowles Foundation, Yale University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  8. Jesse Bull & Joel Watson, 2002. "Evidence Disclosure and Verfiability," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series 2000-16R, Department of Economics, UC San Diego. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  9. Virginia Rosales-López, 2008. "Economics of court performance: an empirical analysis," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 231-251, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? A tutorial is available.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-16.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.