IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-706816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incomplete Information and Product Quality in Rural Markets: Evidence from an Experimental Auction for Maize in Senegal

Author

Listed:
  • Stacy Prieto
  • Jacob Ricker-Gilbert
  • Jonathan Bauchet
  • Moussa Sall

Abstract

Quickly drying grains to a low, safe moisture content is key to increasing their storability and limiting the spread of aflatoxins, potent carcinogenic toxins for children, adults, and livestock. The extent to which people can observe and value moisture content in grain matters because it determines whether markets create the appropriate incentives for actors to dry maize to a safe level for storage. We use an experimental auction with traders and consumers in southern Senegal to elicit participants’ willingness to pay for maize of varying moisture content. Our results suggest that participants are willing to pay more for drier maize but are uncertain of their ability to detect moisture content without it being labeled through external verification. When maize is labeled with its moisture content, participants are willing to pay 22% more for dry maize than for maize that is still too wet to safely store. This includes a quality premium that more than compensates for the difference in density between wet and dry maize. Labeling maize with its moisture content or providing market agents with their own affordable and reliable way to determine moisture content could incentivize more parties to trade drier, safer maize.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacy Prieto & Jacob Ricker-Gilbert & Jonathan Bauchet & Moussa Sall, 2021. "Incomplete Information and Product Quality in Rural Markets: Evidence from an Experimental Auction for Maize in Senegal," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(4), pages 1351-1377.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/706816
    DOI: 10.1086/706816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/706816
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/706816
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/706816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob & Moussa, Bokar & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2021. "Using Branding to Signal Quality in Informal Markets. Evidence from an Experimental Auction in the Sahel," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315284, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Sanou, Awa & Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. & Caputo, Vincenzina & Kerr, John, 2021. "Introducing an aflatoxin-safe labeling program in complex food supply chains: Evidence from a choice experiment in Nigeria," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Hira Channa & Jacob Ricker‐Gilbert & Hugo De Groote & Jonathan Bauchet, 2021. "Willingness to pay for a new farm technology given risk preferences: Evidence from an experimental auction in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 733-748, September.
    4. Jonathan Bauchet & Stacy Prieto & Jacob Ricker‐Gilbert, 2021. "Improved Drying and Storage Practices that Reduce Aflatoxins in Stored Maize: Experimental Evidence from Smallholders in Senegal," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(1), pages 296-316, January.
    5. Nourani, Vesall & Maertens, Annemie & Michelson, Hope, 2021. "Public good provision and democracy: Evidence from an experiment with farmer groups in Malawi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/706816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.