Loss Aversion and Adaptation in the Labor Market: Empirical Indifference Functions and Labor Supply
AbstractThis paper presents empirically determined indifference functions for income and leisure which exhibit the phenomena of loss aversion and a utility reference point determined by adaptation, as expounded by Kahneman and Tversky and others. Data for this study were gathered in original surveys of seven diverse labor markets. The indifference functions of all show common features consistent with loss aversion/adaptation. These features help explain stability in labor markets in the face of an overtime premium which prevents the many workers in the United States from being at an optimal equilibrium and causes discontinuities in labor supply curves. Labor supply curves derived from indifference curves with the loss aversion adaptation features have much smaller discontinuities than those based on simulated curves without these features. Copyright 1996 by MIT Press.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by MIT Press in its journal Review of Economics & Statistics.
Volume (Year): 78 (1996)
Issue (Month): 3 (August)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://mitpress.mit.edu/journals/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Wing-Keung Wong & Raymond H. Chan, 2005.
"Prospect and Markowitz Stochastic Dominance,"
Departmental Working Papers, National University of Singapore, Department of Economics
wp0505, National University of Singapore, Department of Economics.
- Wing-Keung Wong & Raymond H. Chan, 2005. "Prospect and Markowitz Stochastic Dominance," Development Research Unit Working Paper Series, Monash University, Department of Economics 08/05, Monash University, Department of Economics.
- Patricia Tovar, 2004. "The Effects of Loss Aversion on Trade Policy and the Anti-Trade Bias Puzzle," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings, Econometric Society 499, Econometric Society.
- Georgellis, Yannis & Gregoriou, Andros & Tsitsianis, Nikolaos, 2008. "Adaptation towards reference values: A non-linear perspective," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 67(3-4), pages 768-781, September.
- Peters, Hans, 2012.
"A preference foundation for constant loss aversion,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier,
Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 21-25.
- Peters Hans, 2010. "A preference foundation for constant loss aversion," Research Memorandum, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR) 062, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
- Berg, Nathan, 2006. "Behavioral Labor Economics," MPRA Paper 26366, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Dohmen, Thomas, 2014. "Behavioural Labour Economics: Advances and Future Directions," IZA Discussion Papers 8263, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Rizzo, John A. & Zeckhauser, Richard J., 2007. "Pushing incomes to reference points: Why do male doctors earn more?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 514-536, July.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Karie Kirkpatrick).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.