IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v41y2023i1p58-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective Factors to Manage Madrasah Teacher Work Productivity in the Disruption Era: An Analysis of Partial Correlation

Author

Listed:
  • Yetty Faridatul Ulfah

    (Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Raden Mas Said Surakarta Indonesia.)

  • Purwanto Purwanto

    (Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Raden Mas Said Surakarta Indonesia.)

  • Khuriyah Khuriyah

    (Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Raden Mas Said Surakarta Indonesia.)

Abstract

This study aims to find out how factors both internal and external to teachers can affect how productive they are at work. This is accomplished by researching the effects of the following factors on teacher productivity: 1) transformational leadership of madrasa principals, 2) self-efficacy, 3) organizational citizenship behavior, and 4) transformational leadership, self-efficacy, and behavior of organizational citizenship combined. This study used a quantitative model with a correlation approach. This study was carried out at three MTs N in the Sukoharjo Regency, Central Java, in 2022 using a sample of 126 madrasah instructors. The research sample method included proportionate stratified random sampling, and questionnaires were used to gather data for each variable under investigation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Product Moment correlation coefficient test, and Anova test were employed as data analysis tools. Correlation and partial correlation tests are used to test hypotheses. This study comes to the following conclusions: 1) The external element of madrasa principals' transformational leadership favorably and significantly affects teachers' job productivity with tcount of 0.616 higher than rtable of 0.1736, 2) internal factors of teacher self-efficacy positively and significantly affect teacher work productivity with a rcount of 0.604 higher than an rtable of 0.1736, 3) internal factors of teachers’ organizational behavior citizenship (OCB) positively and significantly influences teacher work productivity with a rcount of 0.468 higher than an rtable of 0.1736, and 4) transformational leadership, self-efficacy and OCB as a whole together have an influence on teacher work productivity with Fcount of 55.680 higher than Ftable of 0.1736 indicating that the contribution of those three factors on teacher work productivity is 57.8%, and 42.2% is influenced by other variables not analyzed in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Yetty Faridatul Ulfah & Purwanto Purwanto & Khuriyah Khuriyah, 2023. "Effective Factors to Manage Madrasah Teacher Work Productivity in the Disruption Era: An Analysis of Partial Correlation," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 41(1), pages 58-71, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:41:y:2023:i:1:p:58-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/8507/3128
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/8507
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldhaber, Dan & Krieg, John & Theobald, Roddy, 2020. "Effective like me? Does having a more productive mentor improve the productivity of mentees?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Harris, Douglas N. & Sass, Tim R., 2014. "Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 183-204.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gershenson, Seth, 2021. "Identifying and Producing Effective Teachers," IZA Discussion Papers 14096, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Matthew A. Kraft & John P. Papay & Olivia L. Chi, 2020. "Teacher Skill Development: Evidence from Performance Ratings by Principals," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 315-347, March.
    3. Goel, Deepti & Barooah, Bidisha, 2018. "Drivers of Student Performance: Evidence from Higher Secondary Public Schools in Delhi," GLO Discussion Paper Series 231, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    4. Vargas-Montoya, Luis & Gimenez, Gregorio & Fernández-Gutiérrez, Marcos, 2023. "ICT use for learning and students' outcomes: Does the country's development level matter?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    5. Koedel, Cory & Mihaly, Kata & Rockoff, Jonah E., 2015. "Value-added modeling: A review," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 180-195.
    6. Gershenson, Seth & Lindsay, Constance A. & Papageorge, Nicholas W. & Campbell, Romaine & Rendon, Jessica H., 2023. "Spillover Effects of Black Teachers on White Teachers' Racial Competency: Mixed Methods Evidence from North Carolina," IZA Discussion Papers 16258, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Figlio, D. & Karbownik, K. & Salvanes, K.G., 2016. "Education Research and Administrative Data," Handbook of the Economics of Education,, Elsevier.
    8. Dan Goldhaber & John Krieg & Natsumi Naito & Roddy Theobald, 2020. "Making the Most of Student Teaching: The Importance of Mentors and Scope for Change," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 15(3), pages 581-591, Summer.
    9. Dominic Coey & Kenneth Hung, 2022. "Empirical Bayes Selection for Value Maximization," Papers 2210.03905, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    10. Eric Parsons & Cory Koedel & Li Tan, 2019. "Accounting for Student Disadvantage in Value-Added Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 44(2), pages 144-179, April.
    11. Jiawei Liu & Yong Jiang & Beibei Zhang & Xingjian Zhu & Tianyan Sha, 2022. "Paths to Promote the Sustainability of Kindergarten Teachers’ Caring: Teachers’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Cory Koedel & Mark Ehlert & Eric Parsons & Michael Podgursky, 2012. "Selecting Growth Measures for School and Teacher Evaluations," Working Papers 1210, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
    13. Marc Steeg & Sander Gerritsen, 2016. "Teacher Evaluations and Pupil Achievement Gains: Evidence from Classroom Observations," De Economist, Springer, vol. 164(4), pages 419-443, December.
    14. Cheng, Albert & Zamarro, Gema, 2018. "Measuring teacher non-cognitive skills and its impact on students: Insight from the Measures of Effective Teaching Longitudinal Database," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 251-260.
    15. Li Feng & Tim R. Sass, 2017. "Teacher Quality and Teacher Mobility," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 12(3), pages 396-418, Summer.
    16. Jason A. Grissom & Susanna Loeb, 2017. "Assessing Principals’ Assessments: Subjective Evaluations of Teacher Effectiveness in Low- and High-Stakes Environments," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 12(3), pages 369-395, Summer.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:41:y:2023:i:1:p:58-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.