IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v26y2021i1p43-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical leadership and public accountability: Problematiques of South Africa's State-Owned Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • F. K. L. Kgobe

    (University of Limpopo)

  • K. R. Chauke

    (University of Limpopo)

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the potency of ethical frameworks in the advent of a democratic dispensation in State-Owned Enterprises in an attempt to address conundrums of unethical leadership and devastating public accountability. This paper argues that South Africa is grappling with fitting in the notion of ethos and accountability. On the same line, the contestation about the impasse of the State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) befits germane in the topical and constant political transformation in South Africa. SOEs endure eccentric to those serving it and those who benefit from it, leading to a lack of orthodoxy by public officials to ethical framework prescribed and contemplated in legislation for good conduct in public services. Ethical leadership and public accountability are two sides of the same coin; however, they serve as a nut and bolt of a well-functioning public administration. The two are inseparable. The paper is theoretical as such, and it is epistemologically juxtaposed and grounded or underpinned by agency theory and its ideals. Be that as it may, it further depends on literature base review for its premise, argument, crux, and purpose and drawing up results and conclusion. Thus, the paper gathers information regarding the various scholars' notions on ethical leadership and public accountability from related articles, journals, and books. The paper reveals that the South African State-Owned Enterprises are antagonized and branded by unethical leaders and public accountability challenges. At this juncture, the SOEs are faced with poor fiscal coordination and management. The paper further reveals that the SOEs are swimming in the pool of debts. The conclusion that can be deduced from this paper is that it calls for strengthening and reforming all legislative prescripts that govern the State-Owned Enterprises. Public administrators must avoid incubating politicians as it creates the ground for corruption and various types of ethical dilemmas.

Suggested Citation

  • F. K. L. Kgobe & K. R. Chauke, 2021. "Ethical leadership and public accountability: Problematiques of South Africa's State-Owned Enterprises," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 26(1), pages 43-53, Decembrie.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:43-53
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/5165/1823
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/so
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandra Allini & Francesca Manes Rossi & Khaled Hussainey, 2016. "The board's role in risk disclosure: an exploratory study of Italian listed state-owned enterprises," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 113-120, March.
    2. Tebogo Magang & Koketso Kube, 2018. "Compliance with Best Practice Governance Principles by State Owned Enterprises in Botswana," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(2), pages 149-149, January.
    3. Heo,Kyoungsun, 2018. "Effects of corporate governance on the performance of state-owned enterprises," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8555, The World Bank.
    4. Cheteni, Priviledge & Shindika, Emmanuel, 2016. "Ethical Leadership in South Africa and Botswana," MPRA Paper 80968, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Mar 2017.
    5. Sara Sultan Balbuena, 2014. "State-owned Enterprises in Southern Africa: A Stocktaking of Reforms and Challenges," OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers 13, OECD Publishing.
    6. Daniel Gberevbie & Segun Joshua & Nchekwube Excellence-Oluye & Adeola Oyeyemi, 2017. "Accountability for Sustainable Development and the Challenges of Leadership in Nigeria, 1999-2015," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(4), pages 21582440177, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Celestina Ekene Chukwudi & Daniel Eseme Gberevbie & Ugochukwu David Abasilim & David Imhonopi, 2019. "IPOB Agitations for Self-Determination and the Response of the Federal Government of Nigeria: Implications for Political Stability," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 8, November.
    2. Paolo Esposito & Spiridione Lucio Dicorato, 2020. "Sustainable Development, Governance and Performance Measurement in Public Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Methodological Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2022. "Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Cyber Risk: Evidence from Cybersecurity Related Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 351-374, May.
    4. Ibrahim, Awad Elsayed Awad & Hussainey, Khaled & Nawaz, Tasawar & Ntim, Collins & Elamer, Ahmed, 2022. "A systematic literature review on risk disclosure research: State-of-the-art and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Nadia Smaili & Camélia Radu & Amir Khalili, 2023. "Board effectiveness and cybersecurity disclosure," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1049-1071, December.
    6. Simona Alfiero & Massimo Cane & Ruggiero Doronzo & Alfredo Esposito, 2018. "Determining characteristics of boards adopting Integrated Reporting," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 37-71.
    7. Michael Amoh Asiedu & Emmanuel Mensah, 2023. "Re-examining the corporate governance – Firm performance nexus: Fresh evidence from a causal mediation analysis," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2223414-222, December.
    8. Ligorio, Lorenzo & Caputo, Fabio & Venturelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainability disclosure and reporting by municipally owned water utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Hidaya Lawati & Khaled Hussainey & Roza Sagitova, 2021. "Disclosure quality vis-à-vis disclosure quantity: Does audit committee matter in Omani financial institutions?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 557-594, August.
    10. Kirti Aggarwal, 2023. "Corporate governance and HR disclosure practices: evidence from India," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Tassisius Muzivi, 2022. "An Effective and Prompt Assessment of Good Corporate Governance on Public Sector Entities- Evaluation of Ideal Best Practices," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(1), pages 690-698, January.
    12. Abdelrehim, Neveen & Linsley, Philip & Verma, Shraddha, 2017. "Understanding risk disclosures as a function of social organisation: A neo-Durkheimian institutional theory-based study of Burmah Oil Company 1971–1976," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 103-116.
    13. Pasquale Ruggiero & Daniela Sorrentino & Riccardo Mussari, 2022. "Earnings management in state-owned enterprises: bringing publicness back in," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1277-1313, December.
    14. Ridhima Saggar & Balwinder Singh, 2019. "Drivers of Corporate Risk Disclosure in Indian Non-financial Companies: A Longitudinal Approach," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(3), pages 303-325, August.
    15. Khandelwal, Chandni & Kumar, Satish & Madhavan, Vinodh & Pandey, Nitesh, 2020. "Do board characteristics impact corporate risk disclosures? The Indian experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 103-111.
    16. de Moraes Achcar, Helena, 2022. "South-South cooperation and the re-politicization of development in health," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Lucrezia Songini & Anna Pistoni & Patrizia Tettamanzi & Fabrizio Fratini & Valentina Minutiello, 2022. "Integrated reporting quality and BoD characteristics: an empirical analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(2), pages 579-620, June.
    18. Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Khaldoon Albitar & Atm Enayet Karim & Ahmed Saber Moussa, 2021. "COVID-19 Disclosure: A Novel Measurement and Annual Report Uncertainty," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Christopher P.P. Shafuda & Rainer Lenz & Matthew Mirecki, 2020. "Corporate Governance of SOEs and Compliance With the SOE Governance Act in Namibia: A Survey," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(4), pages 219249-2192, December.
    20. U. D. Abasilim & D. E. Gberevbie & O. A. Osibanjo, 2019. "Leadership Styles and Employees’ Commitment: Empirical Evidence From Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ethical Leadership; Public Accountability; State-Owned Enterprises; Public Administration; unethical conduct; Corruption;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:43-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.