IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v27y2006i3p273-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting Service‐level Measurement for an Inventory System with Different Transport Modes

Author

Listed:
  • Wout Dullaert
  • Bert Vernimmen
  • El‐houssaine Aghezzaf
  • Birger Raa

Abstract

In a stochastic supply link between a supplier and a receiver the receiver will call upon the supplier who can replenish his inventory at the lowest total cost. This total cost typically contains the order costs, transportation costs and inventory costs. A crucial component of the total inventory costs are the costs of safety stock, which is held by the receiver to protect against stockouts. The optimal amount of safety stock can either be derived from the cost of a stockout or from an imposed service level. Since the cost of a stockout cannot always be determined easily, the service‐level approach is a common point of departure for practitioners and academics. Several ways are discussed in the literature to specify the service level, and the definition used can have an important impact on the derived level of safety stock. In this paper the literature on the inventory‐theoretic framework for transport selection is surveyed, with particular emphasis on the criterion that is used to establish safety stock levels. A case study based on real‐life data is then presented to illustrate the impact of two different service‐level definitions on the total logistics costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Wout Dullaert & Bert Vernimmen & El‐houssaine Aghezzaf & Birger Raa, 2006. "Revisiting Service‐level Measurement for an Inventory System with Different Transport Modes," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 273-283, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:27:y:2006:i:3:p:273-283
    DOI: 10.1080/01441640600983371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441640600983371
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441640600983371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allen, W. Bruce & Mahmoud, Mohamed M. & McNeil, Douglas, 1985. "The importance of time in transit and reliability of transit time for shippers, receivers, and carriers," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 447-456, October.
    2. Ganeshan, Ram & Tyworth, John E. & Guo, Yuanming, 1999. "Dual sourced supply chains: the discount supplier option," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 11-23, March.
    3. Cullinane, Kevin & Toy, Neal, 2000. "Identifying influential attributes in freight route/mode choice decisions: a content analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 41-53, March.
    4. W. J. Baumol & H. D. Vinod, 1970. "An Inventory Theoretic Model of Freight Transport Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(7), pages 413-421, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Qinglin & Rezaei, Jafar & Tavasszy, Lori & Wiegmans, Bart & Guo, Jingwei & Tang, Yinying & Peng, Qiyuan, 2020. "Customers’ preferences for freight service attributes of China Railway Express," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 225-236.
    2. Zhuo Zhang & Dezhi Zhang & Lóránt A. Tavasszy & Qinglin Li, 2020. "Multicriteria Intermodal Freight Network Optimal Problem with Heterogeneous Preferences under Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Dullaert, Wout & Zamparini, Luca, 2013. "The impact of lead time reliability in freight transport: A logistics assessment of transport economics findings," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 190-200.
    4. Carballo, Jerónimo & Schaur, Georg & Graziano, Alejandro & Volpe Martincus, Christian, 2016. "Transit Trade," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 7688, Inter-American Development Bank.
    5. Dong, Chuanwen & Transchel, Sandra, 2020. "A dual sourcing inventory model for modal split transport: Structural properties and optimal solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 883-900.
    6. Haiying Jia & Ove Daae Lampe & Veronika Solteszova & Siri P. Strandenes, 2017. "Norwegian port connectivity and its policy implications," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 956-966, November.
    7. Charles Kunaka & Robin Carruthers, 2014. "Trade and Transport Corridor Management Toolkit," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 18241, December.
    8. Marianne Fischman & Emeric Lendjel, 2011. "Market efficiency and French « contrats types » : a transaction cost analysis of the voyage charter for freight inland waterway transport [Efficience du marché et « contrats types » : une analyse t," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-04008565, HAL.
    9. Tempelmeier, Horst & Bantel, Oliver, 2015. "Integrated optimization of safety stock and transportation capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 101-112.
    10. Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Arellana, Julian & Senna, Luiz Afonso, 2017. "Encouraging intermodality: A stated preference analysis of freight mode choice in Rio Grande do Sul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 202-211.
    11. San-José, Luis A. & García-Laguna, Juan, 2009. "Optimal policy for an inventory system with backlogging and all-units discounts: Application to the composite lot size model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 808-823, February.
    12. Rietveld, P. & Bruinsma, F. R. & van Vuuren, D. J., 2001. "Coping with unreliability in public transport chains: A case study for Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 539-559, July.
    13. Evangelos Sambracos & Irene Ramfou, 2014. "The Effect of Freight Transport Time Changes on The Performance of Manufacturing Companies," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 119-138.
    14. Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Auditing the ‘Social’ of Quantum Technologies: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, March.
    15. Morales-Fusco, Pau & Saurí, Sergi & Lago, Alejandro, 2012. "Potential freight distribution improvements using motorways of the sea," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-11.
    16. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    17. Hallowell, Susan F. & Harker, Patrick T., 1998. "Predicting on-time performance in scheduled railroad operations: methodology and application to train scheduling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 279-295, May.
    18. Sambracos, Evangelos & Ramfou, Irene, 2015. "Do freight transport time savings translate to benefit for transport consuming companies?," MPRA Paper 68558, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Huang, Hui & Whalley, John, 2008. "Baumol-Tobin and the welfare costs of national security border delays," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 290-292, May.
    20. William H. Greene & David A. Hensher, 2013. "Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(14), pages 1897-1902, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:27:y:2006:i:3:p:273-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.