IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i7p1862-1884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fuzzy technique for supply chain network design with quantity discounts

Author

Listed:
  • Mariagrazia Dotoli
  • Nicola Epicoco
  • Marco Falagario

Abstract

This paper proposes a hierarchical technique for Supply Chain Network (SCN) efficiency maximisation under uncertainty composed of three steps. The first step extends a previous fuzzy cross-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis approach, originally intended for suppliers’ selection, in order to evaluate and rank all the actors in each SCN stage under conflicting nondeterministic criteria. Afterwards, a fuzzy linear integer programming model is stated and solved for each pair of subsequent SCN stages to determine the quantities required from each stakeholder to maximise the overall SCN efficiency while satisfying the estimated demand and respecting the nodes capacity. Finally, a heuristics is applied to limit the exchange of small quantities in the SCN, in which the trade is not economically convenient according to quantity discounts. An illustrative example from the literature shows the technique effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariagrazia Dotoli & Nicola Epicoco & Marco Falagario, 2017. "A fuzzy technique for supply chain network design with quantity discounts," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 1862-1884, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:7:p:1862-1884
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1178408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2016.1178408
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2016.1178408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kao, Chiang, 2009. "Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 949-962, February.
    2. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Emrouznejad, Ali & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 457-472, November.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Xia, Weijun & Wu, Zhiming, 2007. "Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 494-504, October.
    5. Venkatadri, Uday & Srinivasan, Ashok & Montreuil, Benoit & Saraswat, Ashish, 2006. "Optimization-based decision support for order promising in supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 117-130, September.
    6. Ho, William & Xu, Xiaowei & Dey, Prasanta K., 2010. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 16-24, April.
    7. Liang Liang & Feng Yang & Wade Cook & Joe Zhu, 2006. "DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 35-49, July.
    8. Kamran S. Moghaddam, 2015. "Supplier selection and order allocation in closed-loop supply chain systems using hybrid Monte Carlo simulation and goal programming," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 6320-6338, October.
    9. Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S.M.J. & Malekly, H. & Aryanezhad, M.B., 2011. "A multi-objective robust optimization model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning in a supply chain under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 28-42, November.
    10. Pfohl, Hans-Christian & Köhler, Holger & Thomas, David, 2010. "State of the art in supply chain risk management research. Empirical and conceptual findings and a roadmap for the implementation in practice," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 41981, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    11. Demirtas, Ezgi Aktar & Üstün, Özden, 2008. "An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 76-90, February.
    12. Cakravastia, Andi & Toha, Isa S. & Nakamura, Nobuto, 2002. "A two-stage model for the design of supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 231-248, December.
    13. Yang, Guang-fen & Wang, Zhi-ping & Li, Xiao-qiang, 2009. "The optimization of the closed-loop supply chain network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 16-28, January.
    14. Kaur Arshinder & Arun Kanda & S. G. Deshmukh, 2011. "A Review on Supply Chain Coordination: Coordination Mechanisms, Managing Uncertainty and Research Directions," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Tsan-Ming Choi & T.C. Edwin Cheng (ed.), Supply Chain Coordination under Uncertainty, pages 39-82, Springer.
    15. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    16. Nagurney, Anna, 2010. "Optimal supply chain network design and redesign at minimal total cost and with demand satisfaction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 200-208, November.
    17. D Y Sha & Z H Che, 2006. "Supply chain network design: partner selection and production/distribution planning using a systematic model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(1), pages 52-62, January.
    18. Amirteimoori, Alireza & Kordrostami, Sohrab, 2012. "Production planning in data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 212-218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Siavash Hekmat & Per J. Agrell, 2022. "A strategy-based framework for supplier selection: a grey PCA-DEA approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 263-297, March.
    2. Pankaj Dutta & Bharath Jaikumar & Manpreet Singh Arora, 2022. "Applications of data envelopment analysis in supplier selection between 2000 and 2020: a literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1399-1454, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Venkataraghavan Krishnaswamy & R. P. Sundarraj, 2017. "Organizational implications of a comprehensive approach for cloud-storage sourcing," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 57-73, February.
    2. Mehrdokht Pournader & Andrew Kach & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Ali Emrouznejad, 2017. "Investigating the impact of behavioral factors on supply network efficiency: insights from banking’s corporate bond networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 277-302, July.
    3. Hashem Omrani & Farzane Adabi & Narges Adabi, 2017. "Designing an efficient supply chain network with uncertain data: a robust optimization—data envelopment analysis approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(7), pages 816-828, July.
    4. Li, Yongjun & Chen, Yao & Liang, Liang & Xie, Jianhui, 2012. "DEA models for extended two-stage network structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 611-618.
    5. Despotis, Dimitris K. & Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris, 2016. "The “weak-link” approach to network DEA for two-stage processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 481-492.
    6. Kao, Chiang, 2019. "Inefficiency identification for closed series production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 599-607.
    7. Kao, Chiang, 2016. "Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 778-786.
    8. Chen, Xiafei & Liu, Zhiying & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2020. "Reprint of "Performance evaluation of China's high-tech innovation process :Analysis based on the innovation value chain"," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 94.
    9. Kanokporn Kungwalsong & Abraham Mendoza & Vasanth Kamath & Subramanian Pazhani & Jose Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo, 2022. "An application of interactive fuzzy optimization model for redesigning supply chain for resilience," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1803-1839, August.
    10. Nafiseh Javaherian & Ali Hamzehee & Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo, 2021. "A compositional approach to two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis in intuitionistic fuzzy environment," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 21-39.
    11. Chen, Ci & Yan, Hong, 2011. "Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 147-155, August.
    12. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    13. Galagedera, Don U.A. & Watson, John & Premachandra, I.M. & Chen, Yao, 2016. "Modeling leakage in two-stage DEA models: An application to US mutual fund families," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 62-77.
    14. Saen, Reza Farzipoor, 2007. "Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 741-747, December.
    15. Chen, Xiafei & Liu, Zhiying & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2018. "Performance evaluation of China's high-tech innovation process: Analysis based on the innovation value chain," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 42-53.
    16. Halkos, George & Tzeremes, Nickolaos & Kourtzidis, Stavros, 2011. "The use of supply chain DEA models in operations management: A survey," MPRA Paper 31846, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Yalei Fei & Gongbing Bi & Wen Song & Yan Luo, 2019. "Measuring the Efficiency of Two-Stage Production Process in the Presence of Undesirable Outputs," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 1343-1358, December.
    18. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    19. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    20. Tavakoli, Ibrahim M. & Mostafaee, Amin, 2019. "Free disposal hull efficiency scores of units with network structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1027-1036.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:7:p:1862-1884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.