IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v15y2010i2p59-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact Fees Decision Mechanism: Growth Management Decisions In Local Political Market

Author

Listed:
  • Youngmi Lee

Abstract

While scholars of growth management have focused on the influence of impact fees on housing affordability or land price, less attention has been paid to impact fees in themselves. In particular, there are few studies on the variation in impact fees across cities. From the political market perspective, the decision mechanism of impact fees is more politically complex than economic models have suggested. This study investigates which conditions account for the variation in the amount of impact fees, which are an essential financial resource of local governments. The empirical analysis supports the assumptions of city government on the supply side, and developers and existing residents on the demand side, to decide the amount of impact fees. The findings show that cities with a council-mayor form of government on the supply side are more likely to increase impact fees. On the demand side, cities where residents have a more Democratic ideology tend to increase fees, and, contrary to the initial hypotheses, those with relatively many developers are more likely to increase impact fees.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngmi Lee, 2010. "Impact Fees Decision Mechanism: Growth Management Decisions In Local Political Market," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 59-72, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:15:y:2010:i:2:p:59-72
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2010.10805174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2010.10805174
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2010.10805174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gigi Foster & Charlene M. Kalenkoski, 2013. "Tobit or OLS? An empirical evaluation under different diary window lengths," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(20), pages 2994-3010, July.
    2. Burge, Gregory & Ihlanfeldt, Keith, 2006. "Impact fees and single-family home construction," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 284-306, September.
    3. Eggertsson,Thrainn, 1990. "Economic Behavior and Institutions," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521348911.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Youngmi Lee & Richard C. Feiock & In Won Lee, 2014. "A Multilevel Governance and Growth Management," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 28(4), pages 328-338, November.
    2. Richard C. Feiock & Soyoung Kim, 2021. "The Political Market and Sustainability Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-9, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youngmi Lee & Richard C. Feiock & In Won Lee, 2014. "A Multilevel Governance and Growth Management," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 28(4), pages 328-338, November.
    2. Wang, Hui & Riedinger, Jeffrey & Jin, Songqing, 2015. "Land documents, tenure security and land rental development: Panel evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 220-235.
    3. Barbour, Elisa & Jin, Janet & Goldsmith, Emma & Grover, Salvador & Martinez, Jacqueline & Handy, Susan, 2021. "Tensions and Trade-offs in Planning and Policymaking for Transit-Oriented Development, Transit, and Active Transport in California Cities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt49t729rc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Deslatte, Aaron & Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna & Tavares, António F. & Ślawska, Justyna & Karsznia, Izabela & Łukomska, Julita, 2022. "Land use institutions and social-ecological systems: A spatial analysis of local landscape changes in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    6. Caballero-Miguez, Gonzalo & Fernández-González, Raquel, 2015. "Institutional analysis, allocation of liabilities and third-party enforcement via courts: The case of the Prestige oil spill," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 90-101.
    7. Benjamin Dachis, 2018. "Hosing Homebuyers: Why Cities Should Not Pay for Water and Wastewater Infrastructure with Development Charges," e-briefs 281, C.D. Howe Institute.
    8. Seth W. Norton, 2003. "Economic Institutions and Human Well-Being: A Cross-National Analysis," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 23-40, Winter.
    9. Michaela Haase, 2015. "The cooperation of marketing theory and the ethic of responsibility: an analysis with focus on two views on value creation," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 7, pages 125-149, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Lozano-Gracia, Nancy & Young, Cheryl & Lall, Somik V. & Vishwanath, Tara, 2013. "Leveraging land to enable urban transformation : lessons from global experience," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6312, The World Bank.
    11. Bublitz, Elisabeth & Boll, Christina, 2016. "Individual determinants of job-related learning and training activities of employees - An exploratory analysis of gender differences," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145865, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Klaus Mittenzwei & David S. Bullock & Klaus Salhofer, 2012. "Towards a theory of policy timing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(4), pages 583-596, October.
    13. Giménez-Nadal, José Ignacio & Velilla, Jorge & Ortega, Raquel, 2022. "Revisiting excess commuting and self-employment: The case of Latin America," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1179, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    14. Samuel Garrido, 2010. "Mejorar y quedarse. La cesión de tierra a rentas por debajo del equilibrio en la Valencia del siglo XIX," Documentos de Trabajo de la Sociedad de Estudios de Historia Agraria 1009, Sociedad de Estudios de Historia Agraria.
    15. Полтерович В.М., 1999. "Институциональные Ловушки И Экономические Реформы," Журнал Экономика и математические методы (ЭММ), Центральный Экономико-Математический Институт (ЦЭМИ), vol. 35(2), апрель.
    16. Su, Qinghe & Azam, Mehtabul, 2023. "Does access to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) reduce the household burden of women? Evidence from India," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Basnet, Hem C. & Donou-Adonsou, Ficawoyi, 2016. "Internet, consumer spending, and credit card balance: Evidence from US consumers," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 11-22.
    18. Ghebru, Hosaena, 2015. "Is There a Merit to the Continuum Tenure Approach? A Case of Demand for Land Rights Formulation in Rural Mozambique," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211683, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Sung-Hee Jwa, 2024. "Korea’s Saemaul Undong Revisited as Rural Development Game for Poverty Eradication: A New Development Economics Perspective (Article)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 63(1), pages 19-44.
    20. Stephen DeLoach & Stephanie Franz & Jennifer Platania, 2014. "Reconsidering the effect of work intensity on study time," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 340-343, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:15:y:2010:i:2:p:59-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.