This paper argues that economists would be well advised to do the work that Jacques Derrida calls 'choosing one's inheritance'. This fundamental task, which every heir must undertake, consists essentially of responding to a twofold and contradictory injunction: reasserting a past that the heir did not choose; and reinterpreting and transforming this past through a process of critical rewriting. We argue that this task, particularly the work of critical selection and rewriting, is too often neglected in economics. The fact that the property of path-independence is embedded in the great majority of economic models serves as an illustration of this negligence. Because of their desire to emulate the natural sciences, the neoclassical 'founding fathers' of modern economics bequeathed to their successors this essential property of the physics of their time. A consequence of this inheritance, coupled with the neglect of critical selection and rewriting by economists, is that the properties of path-independent systems - homeostasis and time-reversibility - continue to thrive in the great majority of economic models.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.