This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Tractability assumptions and the Musgrave--Mäki typology

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Frank Hindriks
Abstract

Musgrave (1981) proposed a typology of assumptions, developed further by Mäki (2000), to defend the idea that the truth of assumptions is often important when evaluating economic theories against those economists who consider only predictive success to be relevant for this purpose. In this paper I propose a new framework for this typology that sheds further light on the issue. The framework consists of a distinction between first-order assumptions that state the absence or lack of effect of some factor F , and second-order assumptions that explicate the purposes for which or the reasons why particular first-order assumptions are imposed. Given this distinction, Musgrave's main contention can be reformulated as the claim that, even though the falsity of first-order assumptions is often unproblematic, it is important that the second-order assumptions be true. I go on to introduce the notion of a tractability assumption, which is a second-order assumption according to which a first-order assumption is imposed in order to make a particular problem tractable. It is argued that a realist will want to relax a first-order assumption imposed for reasons of tractability as such assumptions are not even approximately true. These amendments to the Musgrave--Mäki typology are suggested in order to improve our understanding of what moves scientists when they choose particular first-order assumptions, many of which are false, and in order to argue that the practice of doing so can be supported from a realist perspective of science.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=K481433JT7387144
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Taylor and Francis Journals in its journal Journal of Economic Methodology.

Volume (Year): 13 (2006)
Issue (Month): 4 (December)
Pages: 401-423
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:13:y:2006:i:4:p:401-423

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=104715

Order Information:
Web: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: applicability assumption negligibility assumption tractability assumption heuristic assumption early-step assumption Musgrave--Mäki typology F-twist truth instrumentalism realism

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS is also providing many rankings, for example of authors and institutions.

This page was last updated on 2008-8-24.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.