IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v29y2002i1-4p187-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian methods for analysing ringing data

Author

Listed:
  • S. P. Brooks
  • E. A. Catchpole
  • B. J. T. Morgan
  • M. P. Harris

Abstract

A major recent development in statistics has been the use of fast computational methods of Markov chain Monte Carlo. These procedures allow Bayesian methods to be used in quite complex modelling situations. In this paper, we shall use a range of real data examples involving lapwings, shags, teal, dippers, and herring gulls, to illustrate the power and range of Bayesian techniques. The topics include: prior sensitivity; the use of reversible-jump MCMC for constructing model probabilities and comparing models, with particular reference to models with random effects; model-averaging; and the construction of Bayesian measures of goodness-of-fit. Throughout, there will be discussion of the practical aspects of the work - for instance explaining when and when not to use the BUGS package.

Suggested Citation

  • S. P. Brooks & E. A. Catchpole & B. J. T. Morgan & M. P. Harris, 2002. "Bayesian methods for analysing ringing data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1-4), pages 187-206.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:29:y:2002:i:1-4:p:187-206
    DOI: 10.1080/02664760120108683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02664760120108683
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664760120108683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. A. Catchpole & B. J. T. Morgan & T. N. Coulson & S. N. Freeman & S. D. Albon, 2000. "Factors influencing Soay sheep survival," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 49(4), pages 453-472.
    2. Chris Chatfield, 1995. "Model Uncertainty, Data Mining and Statistical Inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 158(3), pages 419-444, May.
    3. A. Racine & A. P. Grieve & H. Flühler & A. F. M. Smith, 1986. "Bayesian Methods in Practice: Experiences in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 35(2), pages 93-120, June.
    4. S. P. Brooks & E. A. Catchpole & B. J. T. Morgan & S. C. Barry, 2000. "On the Bayesian Analysis of Ring-Recovery Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 951-956, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R. King & S. P. Brooks, 2002. "Model Selection for Integrated Recovery/Recapture Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 841-851, December.
    2. Devin S. Johnson & Jennifer A. Hoeting, 2003. "Autoregressive Models for Capture-Recapture Data: A Bayesian Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 341-350, June.
    3. C. Jessica E. Metcalf & David A. Stephens & Mark Rees & Svata M. Louda & Kathleen H. Keeler, 2009. "Using Bayesian inference to understand the allocation of resources between sexual and asexual reproduction," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(2), pages 143-170, May.
    4. R. King & S. P. Brooks & B. J. T. Morgan & T. Coulson, 2006. "Factors Influencing Soay Sheep Survival: A Bayesian Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 211-220, March.
    5. S. C. Barry & S. P. Brooks & E. A. Catchpole & B. J. T. Morgan, 2003. "The Analysis of Ring-Recovery Data Using Random Effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 54-65, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Seber & Carl Schwarz, 2002. "Capture-recapture: Before and after EURING 2000," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1-4), pages 5-18.
    2. R. King & S. P. Brooks, 2002. "Model Selection for Integrated Recovery/Recapture Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 841-851, December.
    3. S. C. Barry & S. P. Brooks & E. A. Catchpole & B. J. T. Morgan, 2003. "The Analysis of Ring-Recovery Data Using Random Effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 54-65, March.
    4. Claudia García-García & Catalina B. García-García & Román Salmerón, 2021. "Confronting collinearity in environmental regression models: evidence from world data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 895-926, September.
    5. Chou, Ping & Chuang, Howard Hao-Chun & Chou, Yen-Chun & Liang, Ting-Peng, 2022. "Predictive analytics for customer repurchase: Interdisciplinary integration of buy till you die modeling and machine learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 635-651.
    6. Sai Ding & John Knight, 2011. "Why has China Grown So Fast? The Role of Physical and Human Capital Formation," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 73(2), pages 141-174, April.
    7. Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti & Luca Pedini, 2020. "ParMA: Parallelised Bayesian Model Averaging for Generalised Linear Models," Working Papers 2020:28, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    8. Robert Lehmann & Antje Weyh, 2016. "Forecasting Employment in Europe: Are Survey Results Helpful?," Journal of Business Cycle Research, Springer;Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys (CIRET), vol. 12(1), pages 81-117, September.
    9. Castle Jennifer L. & Doornik Jurgen A & Hendry David F., 2011. "Evaluating Automatic Model Selection," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-33, February.
    10. Lee, Yun Shin & Scholtes, Stefan, 2014. "Empirical prediction intervals revisited," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 217-234.
    11. Johan Verbeeck & Martin Geroldinger & Konstantin Thiel & Andrew Craig Hooker & Sebastian Ueckert & Mats Karlsson & Arne Cornelius Bathke & Johann Wolfgang Bauer & Geert Molenberghs & Georg Zimmermann, 2023. "How to analyze continuous and discrete repeated measures in small‐sample cross‐over trials?," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3998-4011, December.
    12. Coleman, Stephen, 2005. "Testing Theories with Qualitative and Quantitative Predictions," MPRA Paper 105171, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Ewout W. Steyerberg, 2005. "Local Applicability of Clinical and Model-Based Probability Estimates," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(6), pages 678-680, November.
    14. Mark F. J. Steel, 2020. "Model Averaging and Its Use in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(3), pages 644-719, September.
    15. Ghaderinezhad, Fatemeh & Ley, Christophe & Serrien, Ben, 2022. "The Wasserstein Impact Measure (WIM): A practical tool for quantifying prior impact in Bayesian statistics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Brooks, Jeremy S., 2010. "The Buddha mushroom: Conservation behavior and the development of institutions in Bhutan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 779-795, February.
    17. Ebersberger, Bernd & Galia, Fabrice & Laursen, Keld & Salter, Ammon, 2021. "Inbound Open Innovation and Innovation Performance: A Robustness Study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    18. Brian Knaeble & Seth Dutter, 2017. "Reversals of Least-Square Estimates and Model-Invariant Estimation for Directions of Unique Effects," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 97-105, April.
    19. John Knight & Sai Ding, 2008. "Why has China Grown so Fast? The Role of Structural Change," Economics Series Working Papers 415, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    20. Pritularga, Kandrika F. & Svetunkov, Ivan & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2021. "Stochastic coherency in forecast reconciliation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:29:y:2002:i:1-4:p:187-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.