IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v12y2005i2p279-319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Italian economists in parliament from 1860 to 1922: a quantitative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Massimo Augello
  • Marco EL Guidi

Abstract

In the political background that prevailed in Italy after the unification of the country in 1860, many economists were attracted by the prospect of playing an active role in politics. In particular, thirty academic economists became MPs between 1860 and 1923. Many of them became ministers and three of them were appointed prime ministers. The quantitative analysis attempted in this paper reveals the professional and social characteristics of this group of economists and the importance of their political commitment. Many of them sat in parliament for more than twenty years. In both houses, they often played a technical role, concentrating their efforts in the discussion of the economic issues on the agenda. But they did not refrain from becoming involved with questions of a more direct political nature. The high number of economists who were elected deputies even after the Reform Bills of 1882 and 1911 - which gradually extended the suffrage - implies that they took part in open political contests and built up a network of patronage in their local constituencies. In particular, some indicators - like their presence in the ministries and councils of education and the role they played in the creation of institutions of research - show that they exerted their political influence to facilitate the institutionalization and professionalization of economics. Last, some interesting generational differences are highlighted in this paper. In the period between 1861 and 1922, the relationship between political and scientific/academic reputation was inverted. Whereas the economists of the Risorgimento generation employed their political role as a means to obtain tenure in universities, those of the younger generation trained after 1876, who had received a more specialized education in economics, profited by their reputation as scientists and professors in order to foster their political ambitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimo Augello & Marco EL Guidi, 2005. "The Italian economists in parliament from 1860 to 1922: a quantitative analysis," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 279-319.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:12:y:2005:i:2:p:279-319
    DOI: 10.1080/09672560500112454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672560500112454
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672560500112454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lovell, Michael C, 1973. "The Production of Economic Literature: An Interpretation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 27-55, March.
    2. Alain Alcouffe, 1989. "The Institutionalization of Political Economy in French Universities: 1819–1896," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 313-344, Summer.
    3. David Figlio, 1994. "Trends in the Publication of Empirical Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(3), pages 179-187, Summer.
    4. Quandt, Richard E, 1976. "Some Quantitative Aspects of the Economics Journal Literature," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(4), pages 741-755, August.
    5. George J. Stigler & Claire Freidland, 1979. "The Pattern of Citation Practices in Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabio Masini, 2013. "Facts, Theories, and Policies in the History of Economics. An Introductory Note," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 5-16.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mirucki, Jean, 2005. "Visibilité des contributions en économie industrielle dans les revues scientifiques internationales: 1991-96 [Visibility of Contributions in Industrial Organization in International Scientific Jour," MPRA Paper 30402, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Alireza Tahai & G. Wayne Kelly, 1996. "An Alternative View of Citation Patterns of Quantitative Literature Cited by Business and Economic Researchers," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 263-275, July.
    3. Mirucki, Jean, 2009. "Assessing trends in editorial preferences towards 'Industrial Organization' articles: 1991-2000," MPRA Paper 31168, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2009.
    4. Kenneth W. Clements & Patricia Wang, 2003. "Who Cites What?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 79(245), pages 229-244, June.
    5. James M. Rock, 1984. "A Reason for Ranking Recent Articles: The Case of Macromonetary Articles," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 28(1), pages 80-85, March.
    6. Schymura, Michael & Löschel, Andreas, 2012. "Investigating JEEM empirically: A story of co-authorship and collaboration," ZEW Discussion Papers 12-029, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Mirucki, Jean, 2007. "Visibilité des contributions en économie industrielle dans les revues scientifiques internationales [Visibility of contributions in Industrial Organization in international scientific journals]," MPRA Paper 31688, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2007.
    8. Mirucki, Jean, 2009. "Assessing trends in editorial preferences towards industrial organization article," MPRA Paper 30406, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2009.
    9. Michael Schymura & Andreas Löschel, 2014. "Incidence and extent of co-authorship in environmental and resource economics: evidence from the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(3), pages 631-661, June.
    10. Jean Mirucki, 2001. "Contributions in Industrial Organization, by Linguistic Groups, in Selected Journals," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 18(2), pages 243-254, March.
    11. Mirucki, Jean, 2000. "Editorial Preferences Towards "Industrial Organization" in Selected Journals," MPRA Paper 27836, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Jean Mirucki, 2003. "Assessing editorial preferences towards Industrial Organization articles," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 239-243.
    13. Medoff, Marshall H., 2003. "Collaboration and the quality of economics research," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 597-608, October.
    14. David N. Laband & John M. Wells, 1998. "The Scholarly Journal Literature of Economics: A Historical Profile of the AER, JPE, and QJE," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 42(2), pages 47-58, October.
    15. Frey Bruno S. & Eichenberger Reiner, 2000. "The Ranking Of Economists And Management Scientists In Europe A Quantitative Analysis," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Peterson, Willis L., 1973. "Publication Productivities Of U.S. Economics Department Graduates," Staff Papers 14105, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    17. Frey Bruno S. & Eichenberger Reiner, 2000. "The Ranking of Economists and Management Scientists in Europe," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-9, December.
    18. James Adams & Zvi Griliches, 1996. "Measuring Science: An Exploration," NBER Working Papers 5478, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Mirucki, Jean, 2001. "Analyse comparative de la visibilité des articles en économie industrielle : 1991-1998," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 77(3), pages 455-469, septembre.
    20. Kenneth J. Button, 1981. "The Economic Analysis of Economic Literature: A Survey," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 25(2), pages 36-43, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:12:y:2005:i:2:p:279-319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.