This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Leaders and champions for construction innovation

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
C. H. Nam, C. B. Tatum
Abstract

Based on empirical studies of the role of key individuals in the processes of ten successful innovations in the US construction industry, this paper makes three principal arguments. First, effective leadership is essential for technological innovation - in particular in construction. Second, technological competence is an utmost prerequisite for effective leadership for construction innovation - regardless of the size of the firm. In other words, an entrepreneurial role as a technical champion in a small firm does not change even as the firm grows. Lastly, the role of technical champion can be delegated only with slack resources and adequate power. This paper also highlights conclusions and practical applications to increase technological innovation in design and construction firms.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=LT4URAD8MBWGF70P
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Taylor and Francis Journals in its journal Construction Management & Economics.

Volume (Year): 15 (1997)
Issue (Month): 3 (May)
Pages: 259-270
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:15:y:1997:i:3:p:259-270

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=100154

Order Information:
Web: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: Innovation; Leadership; Technology; Entrepreneurship;

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Steven G. Allen, 1985. "Why Construction Industry Productivity is Declining," NBER Working Papers 1555, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Andreas Hartmann, 2006. "The context of innovation management in construction firms," Construction Management & Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 567-578, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Andy Cosh & Xiaolan Fu & Alan Hughes, 2005. "Management characteristics, collaboration and innovative efficiency: evidence from UK survey data," ESRC Centre for Business Research - Working Papers wp311, ESRC Centre for Business Research. [Downloadable!]
  3. C. Theodore Koebel & Marilyn Cavell, 2006. "Characteristics of Innovative Production Home Builders," Economic Development Publications 39075, HUD USER, Economic Development. [Downloadable!]
  4. Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi & Madhav Prasad Nepal & Moonseo Park, 2005. "A hierarchical structural model of assessing innovation and project performance," Construction Management & Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 565-577, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Tomonari Yashiro, 2001. "A Japanese perspective on the decline of robust technologies and changing technological paradigms in housing construction: issues for construction management research," Construction Management & Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 301-306, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2004. "Managing drivers of innovation in construction networks," Serie Research Memoranda 0015, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics. [Downloadable!]
  7. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2004. "Effectiveness of Innovation Leadership Styles: A Manager's Influence on Ecological Innovation in Construction Projects," Serie Research Memoranda 0027, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics. [Downloadable!]
  8. Sihem Ben Mahmoud-Jouini, 2000. "Innovative supply-based strategies in the construction industry," Construction Management & Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 643-650, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. E. Sarah Slaughter, Hikaru Shimizu, 2000. "'Clusters' of innovations in recent long span and multi-segmental bridges," Construction Management & Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 269-280, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Karen Manley, 2006. "The innovation competence of repeat public sector clients in the Australian construction industry," Construction Management & Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 1295-1304, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Use the JEL tree to browse through the database by subfields.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-5.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.