IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v40y2007i2p251-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial intermediary's choice of borrowing

Author

Listed:
  • HuiChen Chiang

Abstract

This research investigates several dynamic stochastic models of a bank's management problem of the term structures of its assets and liabilities. A bank can either eliminate most of its interest risk with appropriate options, or it can utilize its expertise in its core business and seek extraordinary profits. This research concerns a bank with the latter goal. In this model, the bank seeks to maximize the expected present value of dividend issued subject to the Federal Reserve's regulatory constraint and liquidity constraint. With this model, we find that if the available deposits are not too high and the level of liquid assets is high enough, then it is optimal for a bank to accept all of the available deposits. However, if the level of liquid assets is too low, then a bank should not issue a dividend or to accept any deposits. The properties are still valid even if the bank is not risk neutral.

Suggested Citation

  • HuiChen Chiang, 2007. "Financial intermediary's choice of borrowing," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 251-260.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:40:y:2007:i:2:p:251-260
    DOI: 10.1080/00036840600749706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036840600749706
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036840600749706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David E. Bell & Peter C. Fishburn, 2001. "Strong One-Switch Utility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 601-604, April.
    2. Deshmukh, Sudhakar D & Greenbaum, Stuart I & Kanatas, George, 1983. "Interest Rate Uncertainty and the Financial Intermediary's Choice of Exposure," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 38(1), pages 141-147, March.
    3. Rothblum, Uriel G., 1975. "Multivariate constant risk posture," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 309-332, June.
    4. HuiChen Chiang, 2007. "Commercial loan borrower's optimal borrowing and prepayment decisions under uncertainty," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(8), pages 1013-1020.
    5. M. Shubik & M. J. Sobel, 1992. "On Matching Book: A Problem in Banking and Corporate Finance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 827-839, June.
    6. Smith, Donald J, 1984. "A Theoretic Framework for the Analysis of Credit Union Decision Making," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(4), pages 1155-1168, September.
    7. Santomero, Anthony M, 1984. "Modeling the Banking Firm: A Survey," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 16(4), pages 576-602, November.
    8. Stratton C. Jaquette, 1976. "A Utility Criterion for Markov Decision Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 43-49, September.
    9. Deshmukh, Sudhakar D & Greenbaum, Stuart I & Kanatas, George, 1982. "Bank Forward Lending in Alternative Funding Environments," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 37(4), pages 925-940, September.
    10. Daellenbach, Hans G. & Archer, Stephen H., 1969. "The Optimal Bank Liquidity: A Multi-Period Stochastic Model," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 329-343, September.
    11. Morgan, George Emir & Smith, Stephen D, 1987. "Maturity Intermediation and Intertemporal Lending Policies of Financial Intermediaries," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(4), pages 1023-1034, September.
    12. Ronald A. Howard & James E. Matheson, 1972. "Risk-Sensitive Markov Decision Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(7), pages 356-369, March.
    13. Baltensperger, Ernst, 1980. "Alternative approaches to the theory of the banking firm," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 1-37, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Chen Chiang, 2007. "Optimal prepayment behaviour," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(15), pages 1127-1129.
    2. George Mckenzie & Simon Wolfe, 1995. "Limited liability and bank safety net procedures," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 219-235.
    3. Clemens Bonner & Iman Lelyveld & Robert Zymek, 2015. "Banks’ Liquidity Buffers and the Role of Liquidity Regulation," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 48(3), pages 215-234, December.
    4. Lucy Gongtao Chen & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Melvyn Sim, 2015. "On Dynamic Decision Making to Meet Consumption Targets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1117-1130, October.
    5. Eleni Dalla, 2017. "Monetary policy implications on the investment decision: Do economies of scope in the banking sector matter?," Discussion Paper Series 2017_05, Department of Economics, University of Macedonia, revised Mar 2017.
    6. Clemens Bonner & Sylvester C. W. Eijffinger, 2016. "The Impact of Liquidity Regulation on Bank Intermediation," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 20(5), pages 1945-1979.
    7. Poutineau, Jean-Christophe & Vermandel, Gauthier, 2017. "Global banking and the conduct of macroprudential policy in a monetary union," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 54(PB), pages 306-331.
    8. Zeynep Erkin & Matthew D. Bailey & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2010. "Eliciting Patients' Revealed Preferences: An Inverse Markov Decision Process Approach," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 358-365, December.
    9. Nicole Bäuerle & Ulrich Rieder, 2014. "More Risk-Sensitive Markov Decision Processes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 105-120, February.
    10. Monahan, George E. & Sobel, Matthew J., 1997. "Risk-Sensitive Dynamic Market Share Attraction Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 149-160, August.
    11. Stanhouse, Bryan & Ingram, Matthew, 2007. "A computational approach to the optimal structure of bank input prices," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 439-453, February.
    12. Alistair Milne & A Elizabeth Whalley, 1999. "Bank capital and risk taking," Bank of England working papers 90, Bank of England.
    13. Ms. Corinne C Delechat & Ms. Camila Henao Arbelaez & Ms. Priscilla S Muthoora & Svetlana Vtyurina, 2012. "The Determinants of Banks' Liquidity Buffers in Central America," IMF Working Papers 2012/301, International Monetary Fund.
    14. Dutkowsky, Donald H. & VanHoose, David D., 2018. "Interest on reserves and Federal Reserve unwinding," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 28-38.
    15. Grzegorz Haᴌaj & Christoffer Kok, 2015. "Modelling the emergence of the interbank networks," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 653-671, April.
    16. Neuberger, Doris, 1995. "Diversification, collateral and economies of scale in banking: lessons from a continuous-time portfolio approach," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 253-265.
    17. Eleni Dalla & Christos Karpetis & Erotokritos Varelas, 2014. "Monetary Policy Implications on Banking Conduct and Bank Clients’ Behavior," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 42(4), pages 427-440, December.
    18. Rolando Cavazos-Cadena, 2009. "Solutions of the average cost optimality equation for finite Markov decision chains: risk-sensitive and risk-neutral criteria," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 70(3), pages 541-566, December.
    19. Stanhouse, Bryan & Stock, Duane, 2004. "The impact of loan prepayment risk and deposit withdrawal risk on the optimal intermediation margin," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 1825-1843, August.
    20. Butzbach Olivier & von Mettenheim Kurt E., 2015. "Alternative Banking and Theory," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 105-171, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:40:y:2007:i:2:p:251-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.