IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/topjnl/v30y2022i3d10.1007_s11750-022-00626-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of convexity on expansion planning in low-carbon electricity markets

Author

Listed:
  • S. Wogrin

    (Graz University of Technology
    IIT, Universidad Pontificia Comillas)

  • D. Tejada-Arango

    (Universidad Pontificia Comillas)

  • S. Delikaraoglou

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • A. Lamadrid

    (Lehigh University)

  • A. Botterud

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Expansion planning models are tools frequently employed to analyze the transition to a carbon-neutral power system. Such models provide estimates for an optimal technology mix and optimal operating decisions, but they are also often used to obtain prices and subsequently calculate profits. This paper analyzes the impact of modeling assumptions on convexity for power system outcomes and, in particular, on investment cost recovery. Through a case study, we find that although there is a long-term equilibrium for producers under convex models, introducing realistic constraints, such as non-convexities/lumpiness of investments, inelastic demand or unit commitment constraints, leads to profitability challenges. We furthermore demonstrate that considering only short-term marginal costs in market-clearing may potentially create a significant missing-money problem caused by a missing-market problem and dual degeneracy in a 100 percent renewable system.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Wogrin & D. Tejada-Arango & S. Delikaraoglou & A. Lamadrid & A. Botterud, 2022. "The impact of convexity on expansion planning in low-carbon electricity markets," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 574-593, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:topjnl:v:30:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11750-022-00626-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11750-022-00626-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11750-022-00626-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11750-022-00626-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levin, Todd & Kwon, Jonghwan & Botterud, Audun, 2019. "The long-term impacts of carbon and variable renewable energy policies on electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 53-71.
    2. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S., 2018. "State-of-the-art generation expansion planning: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 563-589.
    3. James B. Bushnell & Erin T. Mansur & Celeste Saravia, 2008. "Vertical Arrangements, Market Structure, and Competition: An Analysis of Restructured US Electricity Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(1), pages 237-266, March.
    4. Mays, Jacob & Morton, David P. & O’Neill, Richard P., 2021. "Investment effects of pricing schemes for non-convex markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 712-726.
    5. Kuang, Xiaolong & Lamadrid, Alberto J. & Zuluaga, Luis F., 2019. "Pricing in non-convex markets with quadratic deliverability costs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 123-131.
    6. Dagoumas, Athanasios S. & Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E., 2019. "Review of models for integrating renewable energy in the generation expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1573-1587.
    7. Gerres, Timo & Chaves Ávila, José Pablo & Martín Martínez, Francisco & Abbad, Michel Rivier & Arín, Rafael Cossent & Sánchez Miralles, Álvaro, 2019. "Rethinking the electricity market design: Remuneration mechanisms to reach high RES shares. Results from a Spanish case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1320-1330.
    8. Cynthia Bothwell and Benjamin F. Hobbs, 2017. "Crediting Wind and Solar Renewables in Electricity Capacity Markets: The Effects of Alternative Definitions upon Market Efficiency," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(KAPSARC S).
    9. George Liberopoulos & Panagiotis Andrianesis, 2016. "Critical Review of Pricing Schemes in Markets with Non-Convex Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 17-31, February.
    10. Hansen, Kenneth & Breyer, Christian & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Status and perspectives on 100% renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 471-480.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Irawan, Chandra Ade & Jones, Dylan & Hofman, Peter S. & Zhang, Lina, 2023. "Integrated strategic energy mix and energy generation planning with multiple sustainability criteria and hierarchical stakeholders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 864-883.
    3. Vrionis, Constantinos & Tsalavoutis, Vasilios & Tolis, Athanasios, 2020. "A Generation Expansion Planning model for integrating high shares of renewable energy: A Meta-Model Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Farrokhifar, Meisam & Nie, Yinghui & Pozo, David, 2020. "Energy systems planning: A survey on models for integrated power and natural gas networks coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Constantino Dário Justo & José Eduardo Tafula & Pedro Moura, 2022. "Planning Sustainable Energy Systems in the Southern African Development Community: A Review of Power Systems Planning Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Botor, Benjamin & Böcker, Benjamin & Kallabis, Thomas & Weber, Christoph, 2021. "Information shocks and profitability risks for power plant investments – impacts of policy instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Keller, Victor & English, Jeffrey & Fernandez, Julian & Wade, Cameron & Fowler, McKenzie & Scholtysik, Sven & Palmer-Wilson, Kevin & Donald, James & Robertson, Bryson & Wild, Peter & Crawford, Curran , 2019. "Electrification of road transportation with utility controlled charging: A case study for British Columbia with a 93% renewable electricity target," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A. Ismael F., 2021. "A review of co-optimization approaches for operational and planning problems in the energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    9. van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Torralba-Díaz, Laura & Bußar, Christian, 2022. "Impacts of power sector model features on optimal capacity expansion: A comparative study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Xin Shi & Alberto J. Lamadrid L. & Luis F. Zuluaga, 2021. "Revenue Adequate Prices for Chance-Constrained Electricity Markets with Variable Renewable Energy Sources," Papers 2105.01233, arXiv.org.
    11. Ratha, Anubhav & Pinson, Pierre & Le Cadre, Hélène & Virag, Ana & Kazempour, Jalal, 2023. "Moving from linear to conic markets for electricity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 762-783.
    12. Nock, Destenie & Levin, Todd & Baker, Erin, 2020. "Changing the policy paradigm: A benefit maximization approach to electricity planning in developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    13. Wei, Zhinong & Yang, Li & Chen, Sheng & Ma, Zhoujun & Zang, Haixiang & Fei, Youdie, 2022. "A multi-stage planning model for transitioning to low-carbon integrated electric power and natural gas systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    14. Holmberg, Pär & Tangerås, Thomas & Ahlqvist, Victor, 2018. "Central- versus Self-Dispatch in Electricity Markets," Working Paper Series 1257, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 27 Mar 2019.
    15. Fuentes González, Fabián & Sauma, Enzo & van der Weijde, Adriaan Hendrik, 2022. "Community energy projects in the context of generation and transmission expansion planning," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Seyed Hamed Jalalzad & Hossein Yektamoghadam & Rouzbeh Haghighi & Majid Dehghani & Amirhossein Nikoofard & Mahdi Khosravy & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2022. "A Game Theory Approach Using the TLBO Algorithm for Generation Expansion Planning by Applying Carbon Curtailment Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Muñoz, Francisco D. & Suazo-Martínez, Carlos & Pereira, Eduardo & Moreno, Rodrigo, 2021. "Electricity market design for low-carbon and flexible systems: Room for improvement in Chile," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    18. Selçuklu, Saltuk Buğra & Coit, D.W. & Felder, F.A., 2023. "Electricity generation portfolio planning and policy implications of Turkish power system considering cost, emission, and uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Xu, Qingyu & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2021. "Economic efficiency of alternative border carbon adjustment schemes: A case study of California Carbon Pricing and the Western North American power market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Scott, Ian J. & Botterud, Audun & Carvalho, Pedro M.S. & Silva, Carlos A. Santos, 2020. "Renewable energy support policy evaluation: The role of long-term uncertainty in market modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:topjnl:v:30:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11750-022-00626-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.