IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/svcbiz/v12y2018i2d10.1007_s11628-017-0352-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of electronic service quality in the online open market and social commerce: the case of Korean young adults

Author

Listed:
  • Suk Bong Choi

    (Korea University)

  • Jin Min Kim

    (Korea University)

Abstract

Past research has revealed that the social commerce market has become both a new opportunity and a threat for companies. However, these studies analyzed the correlation for just one business model and provided inconclusive suggestions. We contribute to fill this gap in the electronic service quality literature by comparing two distinct electronic commerce models: the online open market and social commerce. Using the Kano model and analytic hierarchy process analysis, we empirically investigate 397 young adults in Korea who have experience in using both the online open market and social commerce. The results indicate that (1) the classification and priorities of the two kinds of e-commerce differ and (2) it is worthwhile to consider addressing specific strategies for different business models in order to improve the service quality of the electronic commerce market. We also discuss the main contributions of our research and the implications for managers in terms of improving electronic service quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Suk Bong Choi & Jin Min Kim, 2018. "A comparative analysis of electronic service quality in the online open market and social commerce: the case of Korean young adults," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(2), pages 403-433, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:12:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11628-017-0352-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11628-017-0352-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11628-017-0352-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11628-017-0352-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kun-Tzu Yu, 2013. "A measurement model for service capability from the customer perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(4), pages 563-582, December.
    2. Aurelie Merle & Jean-Louis Chandon & Elyette Roux & Fabrice Alizon, 2010. "Perceived Value of the Mass-Customized Product and Mass Customization Experience for Individual Consumers," Post-Print hal-00585292, HAL.
    3. Ying-Jiun Hsieh & Lan-Ying Huang & Chi-Tai Wang, 2012. "A framework for the selection of Six Sigma projects in services: case studies of banking and health care services in Taiwan," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 6(2), pages 243-264, June.
    4. Sang Lee & Liqiang Chen, 2011. "An integrative research framework for the online social network service," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(3), pages 259-276, September.
    5. Shi-Woei Lin & Yu-Cheng Liu, 2012. "The effects of motivations, trust, and privacy concern in social networking," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 6(4), pages 411-424, December.
    6. Aurelie Merle & Jean-Louis Chandon & Elyette Roux & Fabrice Alizon, 2010. "Perceived Value of the Mass-Customized Product and Mass Customization Experience for Individual Consumers," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00585292, HAL.
    7. Insu Cho & Heejun Park & Jeongil Choi, 2011. "The impact of diversity of innovation channels on innovation performance in service firms," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(3), pages 277-294, September.
    8. Sang Lee & Seong-bae Lim, 2007. "Factors influencing suppliers’ participation in private electronic markets," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 1(1), pages 41-62, March.
    9. Suchismita Satapathy & Saroj Patel & Amitabha Biswas & Pravudatta Mishra, 2012. "Interpretive structural modeling for E-electricity utility service," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 6(3), pages 349-367, September.
    10. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    11. Doherty, Neil F. & Shakur, Mahani & Ellis-Chadwick, Fiona, 2015. "The role of e-service quality management in the delivery business value," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 52-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ki-Kwang Lee & Hong-Hee Lee & Su-Ji Cho & Gyung-Su Min, 2022. "The context-based review recommendation system in e-business platform," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(4), pages 991-1013, December.
    2. Ai-Hsuan Chiang & Silvana Trimi, 2020. "Impacts of service robots on service quality," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(3), pages 439-459, September.
    3. Tazizur Rahman & Yang Sok Kim & Mijin Noh & Choong Kwon Lee, 2020. "Determinants of social commerce adoption in an emerging economy," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(4), pages 479-502, December.
    4. Shiu-Li Huang & Ming-Yen Kuo, 2020. "Critical success factors in the sharing economy: a customer perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(4), pages 553-576, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heng-Li Yang & Shiang-Lin Lin, 2017. "The evaluation factors of adopting SoLoMo services: the hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(3), pages 601-629, September.
    2. Yoo, Jungmin & Park, Minjung, 2016. "The effects of e-mass customization on consumer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty toward luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5775-5784.
    3. Na Liu & Pui-Sze Chow & Hongshan Zhao, 2020. "Challenges and critical successful factors for apparel mass customization operations: recent development and case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 531-563, August.
    4. David M. Goldberg & Jason K. Deane & Terry R. Rakes & Loren Paul Rees, 2022. "3D Printing Technology and the Market Value of the Firm," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1379-1392, August.
    5. Frances Turner & Aurelie Merle & Pauline Fatien Diochon, 2011. "How to Assess and Increase the Value of a Co-Design Experience: a Synthesis of the Extant Literature," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00649498, HAL.
    6. Eric Stevens & Ronald Boucher, 2020. "Designing Co-Creation Platforms: The Case of Configurators Toolkits," Post-Print hal-02872485, HAL.
    7. Turner, Frances & Merle, Aurélie & Gotteland, David, 2020. "Enhancing consumer value of the co-design experience in mass customization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 473-483.
    8. Guo, Shu & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2022. "Self-design fun: Should 3D printing be employed in mass customization operations?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 883-897.
    9. Lacroix, Rachel & Seifert, Ralf W. & Timonina-Farkas, Anna, 2021. "Benefiting from additive manufacturing for mass customization across the product life cycle," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    10. Straus, Lennart & Robbert, Thomas & Roth, Stefan, 2016. "Customer participation in the customization of services: Effects on satisfaction and behavioral intentions," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 9(1), pages 498-517.
    11. Frances Turner & Aurelie Merle & Pauline Fatien Diochon, 2011. "How to Assess and Increase the Value of a Co-Design Experience: a Synthesis of the Extant Literature," Post-Print hal-00649498, HAL.
    12. Ye Yan & Suraksha Gupta & Klaus Schoefer & Tana Licsandru, 2020. "A Review of E-mass Customization as a Branding Strategy," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 215-223, August.
    13. Kolomiiets Olga & Krzyżanowska Magdalena & Mazurek Grzegorz, 2018. "Customer Disposition to Value Co-Creation Activities. The Case of the Clothing Industry," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 26(3), pages 30-48, September.
    14. Piller, Frank & Vossen, Alexander & Ihl, Christoph, 2012. "From Social Media to Social Product Development: The Impact of Social Media on Co-Creation of Innovation," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(1), pages 7-27.
    15. Intaka Piriyakul & Rapepun Piriyakul, 2022. "The moderating effect of influencer on the causal map of mutual information, coproducer and customer value: a thematic analysis of messages posted by brand communities," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(2), pages 131-144, June.
    16. Fogliatto, Flavio S. & da Silveira, Giovani J.C. & Borenstein, Denis, 2012. "The mass customization decade: An updated review of the literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 14-25.
    17. Shuangyao Zhao & Qiang Zhang & Zhanglin Peng & Yu Fan, 2020. "Integrating customer requirements into customized product configuration design based on Kano’s model," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 597-613, March.
    18. Laura Macchion & Rosanna Fornasiero & Andrea Vinelli, 2017. "Supply chain configurations: a model to evaluate performance in customised productions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 1386-1399, March.
    19. Shao, Xiao-Feng, 2020. "What is the right production strategy for horizontally differentiated product: Standardization or mass customization?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    20. Weller, Christian & Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2015. "Economic implications of 3D printing: Market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 43-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:12:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11628-017-0352-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.