IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v10y2018i1d10.1007_s12561-018-9213-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of Causal Effect Measures in the Presence of Measurement Error in Confounders

Author

Listed:
  • Di Shu

    (University of Waterloo)

  • Grace Y. Yi

    (University of Waterloo)

Abstract

The odds ratio, risk ratio, and the risk difference are important measures for assessing comparative effectiveness of available treatment plans in epidemiological studies. Estimation of these measures, however, is often challenged by the presence of error-contaminated confounders. In this article, by adapting two correction methods for measurement error effects applicable to the noncausal context, we propose valid methods which consistently estimate the causal odds ratio, causal risk ratio, and the causal risk difference for settings with error-prone confounders. Furthermore, we develop a bootstrap-based procedure to construct estimators with improved asymptotic efficiency. Numerical studies are conducted to assess the performance of the proposed methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Shu & Grace Y. Yi, 2018. "Estimation of Causal Effect Measures in the Presence of Measurement Error in Confounders," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(1), pages 233-254, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:10:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12561-018-9213-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-018-9213-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-018-9213-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-018-9213-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang Y. & Wang C.Y., 2001. "Consistent Functional Methods for Logistic Regression With Errors in Covariates," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1469-1482, December.
    2. Regier Michael D. & Moodie Erica E. M. & Platt Robert W., 2014. "The Effect of Error-in-Confounders on the Estimation of the Causal Parameter When Using Marginal Structural Models and Inverse Probability-of-Treatment Weights: A Simulation Study," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Small, Dylan S & Rosenbaum, Paul R, 2008. "War and Wages," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(483), pages 924-933.
    4. Daniel F. McCaffrey & J. R. Lockwood & Claude M. Setodji, 2013. "Inverse probability weighting with error-prone covariates," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 100(3), pages 671-680.
    5. J. R. Lockwood & Daniel F. McCaffrey, 2016. "Matching and Weighting With Functions of Error-Prone Covariates for Causal Inference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1831-1839, October.
    6. Kosuke Imai & Teppei Yamamoto, 2010. "Causal Inference with Differential Measurement Error: Nonparametric Identification and Sensitivity Analysis," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 543-560, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Ann Sengewald & Steffi Pohl, 2019. "Compensation and Amplification of Attenuation Bias in Causal Effect Estimates," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 589-610, June.
    2. J. R. Lockwood & Daniel F. McCaffrey, 2019. "Impact Evaluation Using Analysis of Covariance With Error-Prone Covariates That Violate Surrogacy," Evaluation Review, , vol. 43(6), pages 335-369, December.
    3. J. R. Lockwood & D. McCaffrey, 2020. "Using hidden information and performance level boundaries to study student–teacher assignments: implications for estimating teacher causal effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(4), pages 1333-1362, October.
    4. Trang Quynh Nguyen & Elizabeth A. Stuart, 2020. "Propensity Score Analysis With Latent Covariates: Measurement Error Bias Correction Using the Covariate’s Posterior Mean, aka the Inclusive Factor Score," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(5), pages 598-636, October.
    5. Matthew Blackwell & James Honaker & Gary King, 2017. "A Unified Approach to Measurement Error and Missing Data: Overview and Applications," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 46(3), pages 303-341, August.
    6. Hanfelt, John J. & Li, Ruosha & Pan, Yi & Payment, Pierre, 2011. "Robust inference for sparse cluster-correlated count data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 182-192, January.
    7. Millimet, Daniel L. & Parmeter, Christopher F., 2022. "Accounting for Skewed or One-Sided Measurement Error in the Dependent Variable," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 66-88, January.
    8. Hao Dong & Daniel L. Millimet, 2020. "Propensity Score Weighting with Mismeasured Covariates: An Application to Two Financial Literacy Interventions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, November.
    9. Rigdon, Joseph & Berkowitz, Seth A. & Seligman, Hilary K. & Basu, Sanjay, 2017. "Re-evaluating associations between the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation and body mass index in the context of unmeasured confounders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 112-124.
    10. Zhang, Han, 2021. "How Using Machine Learning Classification as a Variable in Regression Leads to Attenuation Bias and What to Do About It," SocArXiv 453jk, Center for Open Science.
    11. Zanhua Yin, 2020. "Variable selection for sparse logistic regression," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 83(7), pages 821-836, October.
    12. Wossen, Tesfamicheal & Abay, Kibrom A. & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2022. "Misperceiving and misreporting input quality: Implications for input use and productivity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    13. Siyu Heng & Dylan S. Small & Paul R. Rosenbaum, 2020. "Finding the strength in a weak instrument in a study of cognitive outcomes produced by Catholic high schools," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 935-958, June.
    14. Li, Tong & Hsiao, Cheng, 2004. "Robust estimation of generalized linear models with measurement errors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1-2), pages 51-65.
    15. Sun, Hao & Wang, Hai & Wan, Zhixi, 2019. "Model and analysis of labor supply for ride-sharing platforms in the presence of sample self-selection and endogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 76-93.
    16. Wenqi Hu & Carri W. Chan & José R. Zubizarreta & Gabriel J. Escobar, 2018. "An Examination of Early Transfers to the ICU Based on a Physiologic Risk Score," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 531-549, July.
    17. Paloyo, Alfredo R. & Rogan, Sally & Siminski, Peter, 2016. "The effect of supplemental instruction on academic performance: An encouragement design experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 57-69.
    18. J. R. Lockwood & Daniel F. McCaffrey, 2017. "Simulation-Extrapolation with Latent Heteroskedastic Error Variance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 717-736, September.
    19. Qin, Guoyou & Zhang, Jiajia & Zhu, Zhongyi, 2016. "Simultaneous mean and covariance estimation of partially linear models for longitudinal data with missing responses and covariate measurement error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 24-39.
    20. Matthew Masten & Alexandre Poirier, 2016. "Partial independence in nonseparable models," CeMMAP working papers CWP26/16, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:10:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12561-018-9213-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.