IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reihed/v59y2018i5d10.1007_s11162-017-9480-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Optimal Global Integration–Local Responsiveness Tradeoff for an International Branch Campus

Author

Listed:
  • Nigel Martin Healey

    (Fiji National University)

Abstract

The growth in the number of international branch campuses (IBCs) has been one of the most striking developments in the internationalization of higher education in recent years. IBCs are overwhelmingly branches of universities in the developed ‘West’. The United States, the United Kingdom and Australia dominate provision. In contrast, IBCs are concentrated in the Middle-East and Asia. The cultural distance between the home and host countries of many IBCs is considerable. This distance poses a major challenge for the successful management of an IBC. Should it localize its curriculum and pedagogy to better meet the learning styles and educational needs of its students or should it provide an educational experience that is comparable to that enjoyed by students on the home campus? This paper takes as its theoretical framework the global integration–local responsiveness (I–R) paradigm. Using an exploratory research design, it finds that the I–R paradigm can be operationalized for IBCs, to predict how faculty, the curriculum and research are likely to be localized in response to pressure from an IBC’s main internal and external stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Nigel Martin Healey, 2018. "The Optimal Global Integration–Local Responsiveness Tradeoff for an International Branch Campus," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(5), pages 623-649, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:59:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11162-017-9480-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11162-017-9480-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11162-017-9480-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11162-017-9480-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barrett J. Taylor & Brendan Cantwell & Sheila Slaughter, 2013. "Quasi-Markets in U.S. Higher Education: The Humanities and Institutional Revenues," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(5), pages 675-707, September.
    2. Julian Birkinshaw & Allen Morrison & John Hulland, 1995. "Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(8), pages 637-655.
    3. Gary Rhoades, 2014. "The Higher Education We Choose, Collectively: Reembodying and Repoliticizing Choice," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(6), pages 917-930, November.
    4. William H. Starbuck, 2005. "How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 180-200, April.
    5. Haugland, Sven A., 2010. "The integration-responsiveness framework and subsidiary management: A commentary," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 94-96, January.
    6. Kendall Roth & Allen J Morrison, 1990. "An Empirical Analysis of the Integration-Responsiveness Framework in Global Industries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 21(4), pages 541-564, December.
    7. Aarrevaara, Timo, 2010. "Academic Freedom in a Changing Academic World," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(S1), pages 55-69, May.
    8. David A. King, 2004. "The scientific impact of nations," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(6997), pages 311-316, July.
    9. Samuel Natale & Caroline Doran, 2012. "Marketization of Education: An Ethical Dilemma," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 187-196, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ziyi Wei & Quyen T. K. Nguyen, 2020. "Local responsiveness strategy of foreign subsidiaries of Chinese multinationals: The impacts of relational-assets, market-seeking FDI, and host country institutional environments," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 661-692, September.
    2. Williams, Christopher & Colovic, Ana & Zhu, Jiqing, 2017. "Integration-responsiveness, local hires and subsidiary performance amidst turbulence: Insights from a survey of Chinese subsidiaries," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 842-853.
    3. Julius H. Johnson, Jr. & Dinesh A. Mirchandani & Seng-Su Tsang, 2008. "Competitive Dynamics, Global Industry Cycles, Integration-Responsiveness, and Financial Performance in Emerging and Industrialized Country Markets," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 7(1), pages 61-88, April.
    4. Devinney Timothy M & Midgley David F & Venaik Sunil, 2001. "An Empirical Examination of the Characteristics of the Integration Responsiveness Pressures," IIMA Working Papers WP2001-08-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    5. Guey-Huey Li & Chwo-Ming Yu & Dah-Hsian Seetoo, 2010. "Toward a Theory of Regional Organization," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 5-33, February.
    6. Johnson, Julius H. & Arya, Bindu & Mirchandani, Dinesh A., 2013. "Global integration strategies of small and medium multinationals: Evidence from Taiwan," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 47-57.
    7. Swoboda, Bernhard & Morbe, Lukas & Hirschmann, Johannes, 2018. "International strategy’s effects on retailers’ local implementation and performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 642-653.
    8. Timothy M. Devinney & David F. Midgley & Sunil Venaik, 2000. "The Optimal Performance of the Global Firm: Formalizing and Extending the Integration- Responsiveness Framework," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(6), pages 674-695, December.
    9. Luo, Yadong, 2002. "Organizational dynamics and global integration: A perspective from subsidiary managers," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 189-215.
    10. Fahy, John, 2002. "A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 57-77, February.
    11. Fang Wu & Linda H. Shi, 2011. "Dealing with Market Dynamism," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 635-663, October.
    12. Banerjee, Shantanu & Venaik, Sunil & Brewer, Paul, 2019. "Analysing corporate political activity in MNC subsidiaries through the integration-responsiveness framework," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    13. Barroso, Alicia & Giarratana, Marco S. & Pasquini, Martina, 2019. "Product portfolio performance in new foreign markets: The EU trademark dual system," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 11-21.
    14. Fan, Di & Zhu, Cherrie Jiuhua & Nyland, Chris, 2012. "Factors affecting global integration of Chinese multinationals in Australia: A qualitative analysis," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 13-26.
    15. Mirchandani, Dinesh A. & Lederer, Albert L., 2008. "The impact of autonomy on information systems planning effectiveness," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 789-807, October.
    16. Mauri, Alfredo J. & Sambharya, Rakesh B., 2001. "The impact of global integration on MNC performance: evidence from global industries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 441-454, August.
    17. Grøgaard, Birgitte, 2012. "Alignment of strategy and structure in international firms: An empirical examination," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 397-407.
    18. Luo, Yadong & Zhao, Hongxin, 2004. "Corporate link and competitive strategy in multinational enterprises: a perspective from subsidiaries seeking host market penetration," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 77-105.
    19. Goodall, Amanda H., 2009. "Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 1079-1092, September.
    20. Domingo Docampo & Lawrence Cram, 2019. "Highly cited researchers: a moving target," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 1011-1025, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:59:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11162-017-9480-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.