IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v58y2024i1d10.1007_s11135-023-01637-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do money and guilt primes affect the likelihood of theft by taking? Findings from a visualized scenario study

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Buck

    (Ghent University)

  • Wim Hardyns

    (Ghent University)

  • Lieven J. R. Pauwels

    (Ghent University)

Abstract

In this article, we report on the results of two experimental manipulations in a visual scenario survey experiment. We explored to what extent a conceptual money and guilt priming task combined with random assignment to a manipulated scenario condition affects the likelihood of theft by taking and anticipated guilt. Data are taken from a region-wide convenience sample of adolescents and young adults (N = 3564). Six subgroups of participants are created based on two experimental manipulations. Firstly, before being presented with a visual scenario vignette depicting the act of stealing a small amount of money, survey participants are randomly assigned to a scrambled sentence test in which the concepts of money or guilt are primed. Secondly, each participant is again randomly assigned to either a visual scenario condition in which a witness is present or to a visual scenario condition in which no one is present. MANOVA is used to test the differences between the subgroups across two dependent variables simultaneously: the likelihood of theft by taking, and anticipated guilt. Results show no significant differences between the experimental conditions and the control condition for the dependent variables. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Buck & Wim Hardyns & Lieven J. R. Pauwels, 2024. "Do money and guilt primes affect the likelihood of theft by taking? Findings from a visualized scenario study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 307-327, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01637-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01637-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01637-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-023-01637-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefanie Eifler, 2007. "Evaluating the Validity of Self-Reported Deviant Behavior Using Vignette Analyses," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 303-318, April.
    2. Kouchaki, Maryam & Smith-Crowe, Kristin & Brief, Arthur P. & Sousa, Carlos, 2013. "Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 53-61.
    3. Caro, Francis G. & Ho, Teck H. & McFadden, Daniel L. & Gottlieb, Alison S. & Yee, Christine & Chan, Taizan & Winter, Joachim, 2012. "Using the internet to administer more realistic vignette experiments," Munich Reprints in Economics 19971, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingfeng Tang & Mei Mei & Cuiwen Li & Xingyang Lv & Xushuang Li & Lihao Wang, 2020. "How does an individual’s default behavior on an online peer-to-peer lending platform influence an observer’s default intention?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Church, Bryan K. & Kuang, Xi (Jason) & Liu, Yuebing (Sarah), 2019. "The effects of measurement basis and slack benefits on honesty in budget reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 74-84.
    3. Nicole Stofberg & Flore Bridoux & Francesca Ciulli & Niccolò Pisani & Ans Kolk & Marlene Vock, 2021. "A Relational‐Models View to Explain Peer‐to‐Peer Sharing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1033-1069, June.
    4. Lu-Ming Tseng, 2019. "How Implicit Ethics Institutionalization Affects Ethical Selling Intention: The Case of Taiwan’s Life Insurance Salespeople," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 727-742, September.
    5. Valerio Capraro, 2018. "Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: A meta-analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(4), pages 345-355, July.
    6. Zilola Sobirova, 2020. "Hoarding and Opportunistic Behavior During Covid-19 Pandemics: A Conceptual Model of Non-Ethical Behavior," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 6(4), pages 22-29, May.
    7. Kennedy, Jessica A. & Anderson, Cameron, 2017. "Hierarchical rank and principled dissent: How holding higher rank suppresses objection to unethical practices," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 30-49.
    8. de Grip, Andries & Fouarge, Didier & Montizaan, Raymond, 2020. "Redistribution of individual pension wealth to survivor pensions: Evidence from a stated preferences analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 402-421.
    9. Guéguen, Nicolas & Jacob, Céline, 2013. "Behavioral consequences of money: When the automated teller machine reduces helping behavior," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 103-104.
    10. Ruttan, Rachel L. & Lucas, Brian J., 2018. "Cogs in the machine: The prioritization of money and self-dehumanization," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 47-58.
    11. Hardin, Ashley E. & Bauman, Christopher W. & Mayer, David M., 2020. "Show me the … family: How photos of meaningful relationships reduce unethical behavior at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 93-108.
    12. Martin Abraham & Katrin Auspurg & Sebastian Bähr & Corinna Frodermann & Stefanie Gundert & Thomas Hinz, 2013. "Unemployment and willingness to accept job offers: results of a factorial survey experiment [Arbeitslosigkeit und Stellenannahmebereitschaft: Erste Ergebnisse eines Faktoriellen Survey Moduls]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 46(4), pages 283-305, December.
    13. Susanne Hoffmann & Francis G. Caro & Alison S. Gottlieb & Iris Kesternich & Joachim K. Winter, 2014. "Contributions of Second Opinions, Outcome Forecasts, and Testimonials to Patient Decisions about Knee Replacement Surgery," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(5), pages 603-614, July.
    14. Santiago Mejia, 2022. "Socratic Ignorance and Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 537-553, January.
    15. Caro, Francis G. & Yee, Christine & Levien, Samantha & Gottlieb, Alison S. & Winter, Joachim & McFadden, Daniel L. & Ho, Teck H., 2012. "Choosing among residential options: Results of a vignette experiment," Munich Reprints in Economics 19970, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    16. Poonam Arora & Gwendolyn A. Tedeschi & Janet L. Rovenpor, 2018. "Broadening the Frame around Sustainability with Holistic Language: Mandela and Invictus," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 233-251, December.
    17. Elsayed, Ahmed & de Grip, Andries & Fouarge, Didier & Montizaan, Raymond, 2018. "Gradual retirement, financial incentives, and labour supply of older workers: Evidence from a stated preference analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 277-294.
    18. Jingqiu Chen & Thomas Tang & Ningyu Tang, 2014. "Temptation, Monetary Intelligence (Love of Money), and Environmental Context on Unethical Intentions and Cheating," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 197-219, August.
    19. Hur, Julia D. & Lee-Yoon, Alice & Whillans, Ashley V., 2021. "Are they useful? The effects of performance incentives on the prioritization of work versus personal ties," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 103-114.
    20. Håkanson, Lars & Ambos, Björn & Schuster, Anja & Leicht-Deobald, Ulrich, 2016. "The psychology of psychic distance: Antecedents of asymmetric perceptions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 308-318.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01637-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.