IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v84y2019i1d10.1007_s11336-018-9647-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tests of Matrix Structure for Construct Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Brian D. Segal

    (University of Michigan)

  • Thomas Braun

    (University of Michigan)

  • Richard Gonzalez

    (University of Michigan)

  • Michael R. Elliott

    (University of Michigan)

Abstract

Psychologists and other behavioral scientists are frequently interested in whether a questionnaire measures a latent construct. Attempts to address this issue are referred to as construct validation. We describe and extend nonparametric hypothesis testing procedures to assess matrix structures, which can be used for construct validation. These methods are based on a quadratic assignment framework and can be used either by themselves or to check the robustness of other methods. We investigate the performance of these matrix structure tests through simulations and demonstrate their use by analyzing a big five personality traits questionnaire administered as part of the Health and Retirement Study. We also derive rates of convergence for our overall test to better understand its behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian D. Segal & Thomas Braun & Richard Gonzalez & Michael R. Elliott, 2019. "Tests of Matrix Structure for Construct Validation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 65-83, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:84:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11336-018-9647-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-018-9647-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-018-9647-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-018-9647-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Bock & Rolf Bargmann, 1966. "Analysis of covariance structures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(4), pages 507-534, December.
    2. R. McDonald, 1974. "Testing pattern hypotheses for covariance matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(2), pages 189-201, June.
    3. J. Srivastava, 1966. "On testing hypotheses regarding a class of covariance structures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(2), pages 147-164, June.
    4. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    5. Ronald L. Wasserstein & Nicole A. Lazar, 2016. "The ASA's Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(2), pages 129-133, May.
    6. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Meena Madhavan & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "The Effects of Innovation Adoption and Social Factors between Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Dante Castillo & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Joan Boada-Grau, 2020. "Teacher Technostress in the Chilean School System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Ogasawara, Haruhiko, 2016. "Bias correction of the Akaike information criterion in factor analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 144-159.
    4. Piotr Tarka, 2018. "An overview of structural equation modeling: its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 313-354, January.
    5. Gaston-Breton, Charlotte & Lemoine, Jérémy E. & Voyer, Benjamin G. & Kastanakis, Minas N., 2021. "Pleasure, meaning or spirituality: Cross-cultural differences in orientations to happiness across 12 countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-12.
    6. Luetke, Maya & Judge, Ashley & Kianersi, Sina & Jules, Reginal & Rosenberg, Molly, 2020. "Hurricane impact associated with transactional sex and moderated, but not mediated, by economic factors in Okay, Haiti," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    7. Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Dante Castillo & Sheyla Müller-Pérez & Joan Boada-Grau, 2021. "Technostress of Chilean Teachers in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Teleworking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Karl Jöreskog, 1978. "Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(4), pages 443-477, December.
    9. Williford, Anne & Sharp, Julia L. & Fout, Alex & Schafer, Casey & Shi, Xiaosong & Isen, Debbie, 2021. "The mediating role of willingness to seek help on the relationship between peer victimization and mental health outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Sławomir Rębisz & Aleksandra Jasińska-Maciążek & Paweł Grygiel & Roman Dolata, 2023. "Psycho-Social Correlates of Cyberbullying among Polish Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-34, April.
    11. Haruhiko Ogasawara, 2007. "Higher-order approximations to the distributions of fit indexes under fixed alternatives in structural equation models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 227-243, June.
    12. Camilla Matera & Lars Dommermuth & Silvia Bacci & Bruno Bertaccini & Alessandra Minello & Daniele Vignoli, 2023. "Perceived Economic Uncertainty and Fertility Intentions in Couples: A Dyadic Extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 790-806, December.
    13. Vanessa Sanchez-Mendoza & Encarnacion Soriano-Ayala & Pablo Vallejo-Medina, 2020. "Psychometric Properties of the Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale among Young Colombians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Falk, Carl F. & Muthukrishna, Michael, 2021. "Parsimony in model selection: tools for assessing fit propensity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110856, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Andreas Falke & Nadine Schröder & Herbert Endres, 2020. "A first fit index on estimation accuracy in structural equation models," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 277-302, March.
    16. Karl, Marion & Kock, Florian & Ritchie, Brent W. & Gauss, Jana, 2021. "Affective forecasting and travel decision-making: An investigation in times of a pandemic," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Sonia Nawrocka & Hans De Witte & Margherita Pasini & Margherita Brondino, 2023. "A Person-Centered Approach to Job Insecurity: Is There a Reciprocal Relationship between the Quantitative and Qualitative Dimensions of Job Insecurity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Masashi Soga & Kevin J. Gaston & Yuichi Yamaura & Kiyo Kurisu & Keisuke Hanaki, 2016. "Both Direct and Vicarious Experiences of Nature Affect Children’s Willingness to Conserve Biodiversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, May.
    20. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:84:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11336-018-9647-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.