IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsched/v25y2022i3d10.1007_s10951-022-00721-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exact and meta-heuristic approaches for the production leveling problem

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Vass

    (TU Wien)

  • Marie-Louise Lackner

    (TU Wien)

  • Christoph Mrkvicka

    (MCP GMBH)

  • Nysret Musliu

    (TU Wien)

  • Felix Winter

    (TU Wien)

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new problem in the field of production planning, called the production leveling problem. The task is to assign orders to production periods such that the load in each period and for each product type is balanced, capacity limits are not exceeded, and the orders’ priorities are taken into account. Production leveling is an important intermediate step between long-term planning and the final scheduling of orders within a production period, as it is responsible for selecting good subsets of orders to be scheduled within each period. We provide a formal model of the problem and study its computational complexity. As an exact method for solving moderately sized instances, we introduce a mixed integer programming (MIP) formulation. For solving large problem instances, metaheuristic local search is investigated. A greedy heuristic and two neighborhood structures for local search are proposed in order to apply them using simulated annealing. Furthermore, three possible extensions that arise from the application in practice are described and implemented, both within the MIP model and within simulated annealing. We make publicly available a set of realistic problem instances from the industry as well as from random instance generators. The experimental evaluation on our test sets shows that the proposed MIP model is well suited for solving instances with up to 250 orders. Simulated annealing produces solutions with less than $$3\%$$ 3 % average optimality gap on small instances, and scales well up to thousands of orders and dozens of periods and product types. The metaheuristic method presented herein is already being successfully used in the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Vass & Marie-Louise Lackner & Christoph Mrkvicka & Nysret Musliu & Felix Winter, 2022. "Exact and meta-heuristic approaches for the production leveling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 339-370, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:25:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10951-022-00721-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10951-022-00721-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-022-00721-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10951-022-00721-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yavuz, Mesut & Tufekci, Suleyman, 2006. "A bounded dynamic programming solution to the batching problem in mixed-model just-in-time manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 841-862, October.
    2. D. Michael Warner, 1976. "Scheduling Nursing Personnel According to Nursing Preference: A Mathematical Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 842-856, October.
    3. Wieslaw Kubiak & Mesut Yavuz, 2008. "Just-in-Time Smoothing Through Batching," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 506-518, June.
    4. Markus Hartikainen & Kaisa Miettinen & Margaret Wiecek, 2012. "PAINT: Pareto front interpolation for nonlinear multiobjective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 845-867, July.
    5. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Scholl, Armin, 2007. "A classification of assembly line balancing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 674-693, December.
    6. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Scholl, Armin, 2009. "The product rate variation problem and its relevance in real world mixed-model assembly lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 818-824, September.
    7. Kubiak, Wieslaw, 1993. "Minimizing variation of production rates in just-in-time systems: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 259-271, May.
    8. C Mullinax & M Lawley, 2002. "Assigning patients to nurses in neonatal intensive care," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(1), pages 25-35, January.
    9. Prattana Punnakitikashem & Jay Rosenberber & Deborah Buckley-Behan, 2013. "A stochastic programming approach for integrated nurse staffing and assignment," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(10), pages 1059-1076.
    10. John Miltenburg, 1989. "Level Schedules for Mixed-Model Assembly Lines in Just-In-Time Production Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 192-207, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Scholl, Armin, 2009. "Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines: Survey, classification and model critique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 349-373, January.
    2. Albert Corominas & Alberto García-Villoria & Rafael Pastor, 2013. "Metaheuristic algorithms hybridised with variable neighbourhood search for solving the response time variability problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(2), pages 296-312, July.
    3. Belií«n, Jeroen & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2008. "A branch-and-price approach for integrating nurse and surgery scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 652-668, September.
    4. Ioanna Makarouni & John Psarras & Eleftherios Siskos, 2015. "Interactive bicriterion decision support for a large scale industrial scheduling system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 227(1), pages 45-61, April.
    5. Boysen, Nils & Bock, Stefan, 2011. "Scheduling just-in-time part supply for mixed-model assembly lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 15-25, May.
    6. Wieslaw Kubiak & Mesut Yavuz, 2008. "Just-in-Time Smoothing Through Batching," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 506-518, June.
    7. Corominas, Albert & Kubiak, Wieslaw & Pastor, Rafael, 2010. "Mathematical programming modeling of the Response Time Variability Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 347-357, January.
    8. Andreas Drexl & Alf Kimms, 2001. "Sequencing JIT Mixed-Model Assembly Lines Under Station-Load and Part-Usage Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 480-491, March.
    9. Korkmazel, Tugrul & Meral, Sedef, 2001. "Bicriteria sequencing methods for the mixed-model assembly line in just-in-time production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 188-207, May.
    10. García-Villoria, Alberto & Salhi, Said & Corominas, Albert & Pastor, Rafael, 2011. "Hyper-heuristic approaches for the response time variability problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 160-169, May.
    11. Nils Boysen & Christian Ringle, 2008. "Über die Wirkung der Optionsbündelung auf die Ablaufplanung einer Variantenfließfertigung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 301-321, February.
    12. Steiner, George & Yeomans, Julian Scott, 1996. "Optimal level schedules in mixed-model, multi-level JIT assembly systems with pegging," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 38-52, November.
    13. Drexl, Andreas & Kimms, Alf, 1999. "Belastungsorientierte Just-in-Time Variantenfließfertigung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 502, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    14. Caridi, Maria & Sianesi, Andrea, 2000. "Multi-agent systems in production planning and control: An application to the scheduling of mixed-model assembly lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 29-42, October.
    15. Bautista, J. & Companys, R. & Corominas, A., 1996. "Heuristics and exact algorithms for solving the Monden problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 101-113, January.
    16. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Scholl, Armin, 2009. "The product rate variation problem and its relevance in real world mixed-model assembly lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 818-824, September.
    17. Matthießen, Lars & Drexl, Andreas & Kimms, Alf, 2000. "Constraint propagation algorithms for the car sequencing problem," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 531, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    18. Fliedner, Malte & Boysen, Nils, 2008. "Solving the car sequencing problem via Branch & Bound," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 1023-1042, December.
    19. Zhu, Jin & Ding, Fong-Yuen, 2000. "A transformed two-stage method for reducing the part-usage variation and a comparison of the product-level and part-level solutions in sequencing mixed-model assembly lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 203-216, November.
    20. Xiaobo, Zhao & Ohno, Katsuhisa, 2000. "Properties of a sequencing problem for a mixed model assembly line with conveyor stoppages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 560-570, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:25:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10951-022-00721-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.