IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/josatr/v6y2021i1d10.1186_s41072-021-00089-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green shipping onboard: acceptance, diffusion & adoption of LNG and electricity as alternative fuels in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Sideri

    (University of West Attica)

  • Michalis Papoutsidakis

    (University of West Attica)

  • Theodore Lilas

    (University of the Aegean)

  • Nikitas Nikitakos

    (University of the Aegean)

  • Dimitrios Papachristos

    (University of West Attica)

Abstract

Today, alternative fuels are seen as a critical area of sustainable technological growth in maritime transport. The International Maritime Organisation (IMO), the United Nations body for maritime issues and other international bodies are in the process of amending and updating the regulations applicable to the shipping industry. Greece is ready to enter the era of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and electricity as marine fuels, as Eastern Mediterranean projects are heading towards adopting these alternative fuels. This study aims to explore the intention of the Greek stakeholders in accepting and using LNG and electricity as alternative fuels. The research objectives are to identify, analyse and evaluate the determinants that influence the intention to accept, diffuse and use alternative fuels, LNG and electricity for marine propulsion, and develop, construct and validate a hybrid model that can be used for future study. This research will clarify possible challenges or barriers to the implementation of technology by stakeholders and contribute to a deeper understanding of the green shipping network. It will also highlight the role of key players in the diffusion phase of technological innovation and the technology itself and its characteristics. Moreover, this research will suggest a unified model using the expansive Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in conjunction with the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) and external variables affecting LNG and electricity 1) to investigate the intent of implementing the use of such alternative fuels and 2) to inform policymakers concerning sustainable shipping.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Sideri & Michalis Papoutsidakis & Theodore Lilas & Nikitas Nikitakos & Dimitrios Papachristos, 2021. "Green shipping onboard: acceptance, diffusion & adoption of LNG and electricity as alternative fuels in Greece," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:6:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-021-00089-z
    DOI: 10.1186/s41072-021-00089-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s41072-021-00089-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s41072-021-00089-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Priyanka Surendran, 2012. "Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 2(4), pages 175-178, August.
    2. Fagerberg, Jan & Martin, Ben R. & Andersen, Esben Sloth (ed.), 2013. "Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199686353.
    3. Siyuan Wang & Theo Notteboom, 2014. "The Adoption of Liquefied Natural Gas as a Ship Fuel: A Systematic Review of Perspectives and Challenges," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 749-774, November.
    4. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    5. Priyanka Surendran, 2012. "Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 2(4), pages 175-178, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamad Issa & Adrian Ilinca & Hussein Ibrahim & Patrick Rizk, 2022. "Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships: Problems and Challenges Facing the Regulatory Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Atak, Üstün & Aydın, Umut & Menekşe, Akın, 2023. "An integrated decision-making approach under spherical fuzzy environment for selection of vessel main engines," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(2).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ernest Osei & PETER KWASI OPPONG, 2020. "The Role of Computer Education in the Behavioral Intentions to Use Information Technology in Hospitals in Kumasi, Ghana," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(4), pages 13-22.
    2. Shafiqul Islam & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Noor-E- Zannat, 2023. "Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    3. Anuja Shukla & Shiv Kumar Sharma, 2018. "Evaluating Consumers’ Adoption of Mobile Technology for Grocery Shopping: An Application of Technology Acceptance Model," Vision, , vol. 22(2), pages 185-198, June.
    4. Dirsehan, Taşkın & Cankat, Ece, 2021. "Role of mobile food-ordering applications in developing restaurants’ brand satisfaction and loyalty in the pandemic period," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. M. Nazmul Islam & Fumitaka Furuoka & Aida Idris, 2021. "Influence of Gender Diversity on Employee Work Engagement in the Context of Organizational Change: Evidence From Bangladeshi Employees," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Mohammad Mahtab Alam & Naim Ahmad & Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Ayyub Patel & Mohammed Abohashrh & Mohammed Abdul Khaleel, 2021. "E-Learning Services to Achieve Sustainable Learning and Academic Performance: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Kimiagari, Salman & Asadi Malafe, Neda Sharifi, 2021. "The role of cognitive and affective responses in the relationship between internal and external stimuli on online impulse buying behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Siahaan, Andysah Putera Utama & Nasution, Muhammad Dharma Tuah Putra, 2018. "Online Shoppers Acceptance An Exploratory Study," INA-Rxiv 4hs6x, Center for Open Science.
    9. Nurul Nadia Abd Aziz & Normilia Abd Wahid, 2018. "Factors Influencing Online Purchase Intention among University Students," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(7), pages 702-717, July.
    10. Jimin Shim & Joonho Moon & Myungkeun Song & Won Seok Lee, 2021. "Antecedents of Purchase Intention at Starbucks in the Context of Covid-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Daojun Zhong & Tengfei Lyu, 2022. "Implementation of supply chain management practices and its effect on textile firm's performance at China: A mediation analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2515-2528, September.
    12. Kirsi Kotilainen & Ulla A. Saari, 2018. "Policy Influence on Consumers’ Evolution into Prosumers—Empirical Findings from an Exploratory Survey in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Xin Yi Chan & Muhammad Khalilur Rahman & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Wan Mohd Hirwani Wan Hussain & Syed Shah Alam, 2022. "Predicting the Intention and Adoption of Mobile Shopping During the COVID-19 Lockdown in Malaysia," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    14. Ivana Kursan Milaković & Mirela Mihić & Ivana Boljat, 2020. "Consumer Attitudes Towards Social Network Advertising: Predictors and Outcomes," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 32(SI), pages 83-97.
    15. Sanduni I. Senaratne & Samantha M. Samarasinghe, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Intention to Adopt M-Learning," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 150-164, February.
    16. Ahmad Althunibat & Muhammad Binsawad & Mohammed Amin Almaiah & Omar Almomani & Adeeb Alsaaidah & Waleed Al-Rahmi & Mohamed Elhassan Seliaman, 2021. "Sustainable Applications of Smart-Government Services: A Model to Understand Smart-Government Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Jeremiah Kau Makokoane & Docter Joe Khosa, 2021. "Applying UTAUT and Fuzzy Dematel Methods: A New Legal Aid Administration System," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 24-36, November.
    18. Tai Abdulrahman Alshammari & Khalid Mhasan Alshammary & Fahad Maiyah Alshammari, 2022. "Impact of Perceived Quality of E-Health Services on Patient Behavioral Intention to Use E-Health Services: A Moderating Role of Knowledge of E-Health Management," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 14(1), pages 23-38.
    19. Lestari, Diyan, 2019. "Measuring e-commerce adoption behaviour among gen-Z in Jakarta, Indonesia," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 103-115.
    20. Ufuk Cebeci & Oguzhan Ince & Hulya Turkcan, 2019. "Understanding the Intention to Use Netflix: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Approach," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 152-157.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:6:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-021-00089-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.