IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/josatr/v5y2020i1d10.1186_s41072-020-00072-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-evolution of port business ecosystem based on evolutionary game theory

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjuan Li

    (Shanghai Maritime University)

  • Thierry Vanelslander

    (University of Antwerp)

  • Wei Liu

    (Shanghai Maritime University)

  • Xu Xu

    (Shanghai Dian Ji University)

Abstract

As distributing centres of trade and transportation network, ports play an important role in the development of the national economy. With the changing of the global business environment, the port enterprise operation environment is continuously changing, and growing problems are becoming increasingly complex. Since challenges, uncertainties, risks, and crisis exist side by side, it is indispensable and beneficial to do a systematic analysis of the development of port enterprises from the perspective of biological co-evolution. This paper uses the evolutionary game model to discuss the dynamic change process and evolutionary stable strategy of the collaborative development of the core enterprise and cooperative enterprise in the port business ecosystem. Then, the influencing factors of enterprise decision-making or action selection are analysed, and the numerical model verifies the accuracy of the model. Finally, suggestions on the development of the port business ecosystem are put forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjuan Li & Thierry Vanelslander & Wei Liu & Xu Xu, 2020. "Co-evolution of port business ecosystem based on evolutionary game theory," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:5:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-020-00072-0
    DOI: 10.1186/s41072-020-00072-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s41072-020-00072-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s41072-020-00072-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soraya Hidalgo-Gallego & Ramón Núñez-Sánchez & Pablo Coto-Millán, 2017. "Game Theory And Port Economics: A Survey Of Recent Research," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 854-877, July.
    2. Heather Mclaughlin & Colm Fearon, 2013. "Understanding the development of port and regional relationships: a new cooperation/competition matrix," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 278-294, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter J. Stavroulakis & Stratos Papadimitriou, 2022. "Total cost of ownership in shipping: a framework for sustainability," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Qiang & Zheng, Shiyuan & Geerlings, Harry & El Makhloufi, Abdel, 2019. "Port governance revisited: How to govern and for what purpose?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 46-57.
    2. Kavirathna, Chathumi Ayanthi & Kawasaki, Tomoya & Hanaoka, Shinya, 2019. "Intra-port coopetition under different combinations of terminal ownership," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 132-148.
    3. Markus Hesse, 2018. "Approaching the Relational Nature of the Port‐City Interface in Europe: Ties and Tensions Between Seaports and the Urban," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(2), pages 210-223, April.
    4. Song, Zhuzhu & Tang, Wansheng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2018. "Cooperation mode for a liner company with heterogeneous ports: Business cooperation vs. port investment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 513-533.
    5. Luo, Meifeng & Chen, Fuying & Zhang, Jiantong, 2022. "Relationships among port competition, cooperation and competitiveness: A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Wang, Junjin & Liu, Jiaguo & Wang, Fan & Yue, Xiaohang, 2021. "Blockchain technology for port logistics capability: Exclusive or sharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 347-392.
    7. Ma, Hoi-Lam & Wong, Collin Wai-Hung & Leung, Lawrence C. & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2020. "Facility sharing in business-to-business model: A real case study for container terminal operators in Hong Kong port," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Sakalayen, Quazi & Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling & Cahoon, Stephen, 2022. "A place-based approach for ports' involvement in regional development: A mixed-method research outcome," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 16-31.
    9. Merkel, Axel, 2017. "Spatial competition and complementarity in European port regions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 40-47.
    10. Marasco, Addolorata & Romano, Alessandro, 2018. "Inter-port interactions in the Le Havre-Hamburg range: A scenario analysis using a nonautonomous Lotka Volterra model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 207-220.
    11. Zhang, Qiang & Yan, Kai & Yang, Dong, 2021. "Port system evolution in Chinese coastal regions: A provincial perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Dongping Song, 2021. "A Literature Review, Container Shipping Supply Chain: Planning Problems and Research Opportunities," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Ngui Min Fui Tom, 2019. "Strategy to Build a Transshipment Port as a Catalyst to Achieving Critical Mass for Sabah’s Economic Growth," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 141-166, July.
    14. Hidalgo-Gallego, Soraya & Núñez-Sánchez, Ramón & Coto-Millán, Pablo, 2021. "Strategic interdependence in capacity expansion: A spatial analysis for port infrastructure services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 14-29.
    15. Dung-Ying Lin & Chien-Chih Huang & ManWo Ng, 2017. "The coopetition game in international liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 474-495, May.
    16. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:5:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-020-00072-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.