IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglont/v12y2022i1d10.1007_s40497-022-00337-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foreign direct investments and spillover effect on entrepreneurial activities in India: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Seema Singha

    (Assam University)

  • Soma Roy Dey Choudhury

    (Assam University)

  • Brajesh Kumar

    (Central University of South Bihar)

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the impact of foreign direct investments on the growth of entrepreneurial activities based on indirect linkages established between foreign affiliates and local micro, small and medium enterprises in India. Since foreign direct investment is not allowed in the micro, small and medium enterprise sector, the study uses an indirect linkage approach to determine the magnitude and direction of the association between foreign capital inflows and the rate of change in entrepreneurial activities. Methodology For investigation, the researcher used the following variables based on past studies: coefficient of backwards and forward intersectoral linkages, inflows of foreign capital sector-wise, gross domestic products, exports, employment and number of working enterprises registered in the micro, small and medium enterprise sector of India. Data for the present study was derived from the annual report of micro, small and medium enterprises of India, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, foreign direct investment fact sheet, Central Statistics Office of India and Asian Development Bank for input–output and supply-use table to estimate the coefficient of forward and backward linkages. Due to limited data availability and irregularity in the maintenance of records of the micro, small and medium enterprise sector, the study’s time frame is limited from 2006 to 2017 (due to the unavailability of data of the micro, small and medium enterprise sector). The coefficient of backward and forward linkages is estimated by the Rasmussen method from the input–output table, and to analyse the data, a simple panel linear model is used. Panel corrected the standard error for robust standard error and the Hausman-Taylor instrument variable to check the robustness of the outcome of the linear model and control the diagnostic issue related to the linear model. The result indicated a positive and significant association between foreign direct investment inflows and the growth of entrepreneurial activities, not allowed in the micro, small and medium enterprise sector; the coefficient of forward linkages positively encouraged entrepreneurship, but backward linkage failed to do the same. This result shows the market-seeking motive of foreign affiliates in India and less dependency on local firms for input supply and manufacture of final products and hence discouraging the entrepreneurial activities in the upward vertical sector and sometimes situation of “crowding-out effects”. This finding will help policymakers to correct the lacuna and develop policy measures to improve the linkage between foreign affiliates and local firms, especially backward linkages.

Suggested Citation

  • Seema Singha & Soma Roy Dey Choudhury & Brajesh Kumar, 2022. "Foreign direct investments and spillover effect on entrepreneurial activities in India: an empirical study," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 423-439, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglont:v:12:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s40497-022-00337-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40497-022-00337-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40497-022-00337-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40497-022-00337-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacob Hörisch & Jana Kollat & Steven A. Brieger, 2017. "What influences environmental entrepreneurship? A multilevel analysis of the determinants of entrepreneurs’ environmental orientation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 47-69, January.
    2. Koen De Backer & Leo Sleuwaegen, 2003. "Does Foreign Direct Investment Crowd Out Domestic Entrepreneurship?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 22(1), pages 67-84, February.
    3. Fujimori, Azusa & Sato, Takahiro, 2015. "Productivity and technology diffusion in India: The spillover effects from foreign direct investment," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 630-651.
    4. Rosa Forte & Rui Moura, 2013. "The Effects Of Foreign Direct Investment On The Host Country'S Economic Growth: Theory And Empirical Evidence," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 58(03), pages 1-28.
    5. Byungchae Jin & Francisco García & Robert Salomon, 2019. "Inward foreign direct investment and local firm innovation: The moderating role of technological capabilities," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(5), pages 847-855, July.
    6. Danakol, Seçil Hülya & Estrin, Saul & Reynolds, Paul & Weitzel, Utz, 2013. "Foreign Direct Investment and Domestic Entrepreneurship: Blessing or Curse?," IZA Discussion Papers 7796, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Badi Baltagi & Seuck Song, 2006. "Unbalanced panel data: A survey," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 493-523, October.
    8. Beata Smarzynska Javorcik, 2004. "Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(3), pages 605-627, June.
    9. Jozef Konings, 2001. "The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 9(3), pages 619-633, November.
    10. Alfaro, Laura & Chanda, Areendam & Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem & Sayek, Selin, 2004. "FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 89-112, October.
    11. Li Shen & Peter Koveos & Xiaodong Zhu & Fei Wen & Jiaxian Liao, 2020. "Outward FDI and Entrepreneurship: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Tung Son Ha & Vu Tuan Chu & Mai Tuyet Thi Nguyen & Dung Hoai Thi Nguyen & Anh Ngoc Thi Nguyen, 2021. "The impact of Greenfield investment on domestic entrepreneurship," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Meghana Ayyagari & Renáta Kosová, 2010. "Does FDI Facilitate Domestic Entry? Evidence from the Czech Republic," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 14-29, February.
    14. Hai Thanh Nguyen, 2021. "Intersectoral linkages and imports of Vietnam: An input-output approach," Departmental Working Papers 2021-03, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    15. Rajeev K. Goel, 2018. "Foreign direct investment and entrepreneurship: gender differences across international economic freedom and taxation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 887-897, April.
    16. Wang, Chengqi & Deng, Ziliang & Kafouros, Mario I. & Chen, Yan, 2012. "Reconceptualizing the spillover effects of foreign direct investment: A process-dependent approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 452-464.
    17. Sara Amoroso & Bettina Müller, 2018. "The short-run effects of knowledge intensive greenfield FDI on new domestic entry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 815-836, June.
    18. Peter J. Buckley & Jeremy Clegg & Chengqi Wang, 2010. "Is the Relationship between Inward FDI and Spillover Effects Linear? An Empirical Examination of the Case of China," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Foreign Direct Investment, China and the World Economy, chapter 9, pages 192-215, Palgrave Macmillan.
    19. R. Nagaraj & Vikash Vaibhav, 2020. "Revising the Definition of MSMEs: Who is Likely to Benefit From it?," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 63(1), pages 119-126, October.
    20. Md Arif-Ur-Rahman & Kazuo Inaba, 2021. "Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers: a firm-level analysis of Bangladesh in comparison with Vietnam," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tung Son Ha & Vu Tuan Chu & Mai Tuyet Thi Nguyen & Dung Hoai Thi Nguyen & Anh Ngoc Thi Nguyen, 2021. "The impact of Greenfield investment on domestic entrepreneurship," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Sara Amoroso & Bettina Müller, 2018. "The short-run effects of knowledge intensive greenfield FDI on new domestic entry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 815-836, June.
    3. Jenny Berrill & Martha O’Hagan-Luff & André Stel, 2020. "The moderating role of education in the relationship between FDI and entrepreneurial activity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1041-1059, April.
    4. Slesman, Ly & Abubakar, Yazid Abdullahi & Mitra, Jay, 2021. "Foreign direct investment and entrepreneurship: Does the role of institutions matter?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    5. FERRAGINA, Anna Maria, 2013. "The Impact of FDI on Firm Survival and Employment: A Comparative Analysis for Turkey and Italy," CELPE Discussion Papers 127, CELPE - CEnter for Labor and Political Economics, University of Salerno, Italy.
    6. Seçil Hülya Danakol & Saul Estrin & Paul Reynolds & Utz Weitzel, 2017. "Foreign direct investment via M&A and domestic entrepreneurship: blessing or curse?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 599-612, March.
    7. Sheng Fang & Dean Xu & Lixin Colin Xu & Heba Shams, 2023. "Does FDI have a social demonstration effect in developing economies? Evidence based on the presence of women-led local firms," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(7), pages 1332-1350, September.
    8. Marzieh Abolhassani & Seçil Hülya Danakol, 2019. "Wage and competition channels of foreign direct investment and new firm entry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 935-960, December.
    9. Yilmaz Bayar & Marius Dan Gavriletea & Zeki Ucar, 2018. "Financial Sector Development, Openness, and Entrepreneurship: Panel Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Hu, Dengfeng & You, Kefei & Esiyok, Bulent, 2021. "Foreign direct investment among developing markets and its technological impact on host: Evidence from spatial analysis of Chinese investment in Africa," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    11. Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu & Matei Tămăşilă, 2016. "Exploring the role of FDI in enhancing the entrepreneurial activity in Europe: a panel data analysis," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 629-657, September.
    12. Orlic, Edvard & Hashi, Iraj & Hisarciklilar, Mehtap, 2018. "Cross sectoral FDI spillovers and their impact on manufacturing productivity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 777-796.
    13. Jenny Berrill & Martha O’Hagan-Luff & André Van Stel, 2021. "Analyzing the relationship between inward FDI, education and entrepreneurial activity at the macro-level," Revista de Economía Laboral - Spanish Journal of Labour Economics, Asociación Española de Economía Laboral - AEET, vol. 18, pages 52-73.
    14. Jin, Shaosheng & Guo, Haiyue & Delgado, Michael S. & Wang, H. Holly, 2017. "Benefit or damage? The productivity effects of FDI in the Chinese food industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-9.
    15. Argentino Pessoa, 2008. "Multinational Corporations, Foreign Investment, and Royalties and License Fees: Effects on Host-Country Total Factor Productivity," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 28, pages 6-31, December.
    16. Yilmaz Bayar & Marius Dan Gavriletea, 2018. "Foreign Direct Investment Inflows and Financial Development in Central and Eastern European Union Countries: A Panel Cointegration and Causality," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13, May.
    17. Anna Ferragina & Fernanda Mazzotta, 2014. "FDI spillovers on firm survival in Italy: absorptive capacity matters!," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 859-897, December.
    18. Munemo, Jonathan, 2017. "Foreign direct investment and business start-up in developing countries: The role of financial market development," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 97-106.
    19. Chiara Franco & John P. Weche Gelübcke, 2015. "The Death of German Firms: What Role for Foreign Direct Investment?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 677-703, April.
    20. Harrison, Ann & Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés, 2010. "Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Dani Rodrik & Mark Rosenzweig (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 4039-4214, Elsevier.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Foreign direct investment (FDI); Entrepreneurship; Micro; Small and medium enterprises (MSMEs); Spillover; Linkage; Panel-corrected standard error (PCSE); Hausman-Taylor instrument variable model (HT-IV);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E0 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General
    • E1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models
    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglont:v:12:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s40497-022-00337-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.