IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v45y2023i1d10.1007_s10878-022-00933-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vehicle scheduling problems with two agents on a line

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Yan

    (East China University of Science and Technology)

  • Peihai Liu

    (East China University of Science and Technology)

  • Xiwen Lu

    (East China University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

This paper studies the two-agent vehicle scheduling problems on a line with the constraint that each job is processed after its release time. All jobs belong to agent A or agent B and each job is located at some vertex on the line. The vehicle starts from an initial vertex $$v_{0}$$ v 0 to process all jobs. The objective of the problem is to find a route of the vehicle so as to minimize the makespan of agent A under the constraint condition that the makespan of agent B is no more than the threshold value Q. This problem can be expressed by the 3-field scheduling notations as $$line-1|r(v_{j}),~C_{max}^{B}\le Q|C_{max}^{A}$$ l i n e - 1 | r ( v j ) , C max B ≤ Q | C max A . For the problem without release time, we show this problem is solvable in polynomial time and an O(n) time algorithm is provided. For the problem with release time, we prove this problem is NP-hard and then, a $$\frac{3+\sqrt{5}}{2}$$ 3 + 5 2 -approximation algorithm is presented. Finally, we conclude the numerical experiments to evaluate the performance of the approximation algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Yan & Peihai Liu & Xiwen Lu, 2023. "Vehicle scheduling problems with two agents on a line," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:45:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-022-00933-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-022-00933-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-022-00933-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-022-00933-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harilaos N. Psaraftis & Marius M. Solomon & Thomas L. Magnanti & Tai-Up Kim, 1990. "Routing and Scheduling on a Shoreline with Release Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 212-223, February.
    2. Joseph Y.-T. Leung & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2010. "Competitive Two-Agent Scheduling and Its Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 458-469, April.
    3. Wang, Jun-Qiang & Fan, Guo-Qiang & Zhang, Yingqian & Zhang, Cheng-Wu & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2017. "Two-agent scheduling on a single parallel-batching machine with equal processing time and non-identical job sizes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 478-490.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Pei & Jinling Wei & Baoyu Liao & Xinbao Liu & Panos M. Pardalos, 2020. "Two-agent scheduling on bounded parallel-batching machines with an aging effect of job-position-dependent," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 191-223, November.
    2. Chen, Rubing & Geng, Zhichao & Lu, Lingfa & Yuan, Jinjiang & Zhang, Yuan, 2022. "Pareto-scheduling of two competing agents with their own equal processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 414-431.
    3. Gao, Yuan & Yuan, Jinjiang & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2019. "A further study on two-agent parallel-batch scheduling with release dates and deteriorating jobs to minimize the makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 74-81.
    4. Yuanxiao Wu & Xiwen Lu, 0. "Improved algorithms for single vehicle scheduling on tree/cycle networks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    5. Fowler, John W. & Mönch, Lars, 2022. "A survey of scheduling with parallel batch (p-batch) processing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 1-24.
    6. Nong, Q.Q. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Ng, C.T., 2011. "Two-agent scheduling to minimize the total cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 39-44, November.
    7. Xu, Jun & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Liu, Zhixin, 2022. "Parallel batch scheduling: Impact of increasing machine capacity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2016. "An Ordered Flow Shop with Two Agents," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(05), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Shesh Narayan Sahu & Yuvraj Gajpal & Swapan Debbarma, 2018. "Two-agent-based single-machine scheduling with switchover time to minimize total weighted completion time and makespan objectives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 623-640, October.
    10. Geng, Zhichao & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2023. "Single-machine scheduling of multiple projects with controllable processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1074-1090.
    11. Ruyan He & Jinjiang Yuan, 2020. "Two-Agent Preemptive Pareto-Scheduling to Minimize Late Work and Other Criteria," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Zhichao Geng & Jiayu Liu, 0. "Single machine batch scheduling with two non-disjoint agents and splitable jobs," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    13. Koulamas, Christos, 2015. "A note on scheduling problems with competing agents and earliness minimization objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 875-876.
    14. Gur Mosheiov & Daniel Oron, 2023. "A note on batch scheduling on a two-machine flowshop with machine-dependent processing times," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 457-469, September.
    15. Ren-Xia Chen & Shi-Sheng Li, 2019. "Two-agent single-machine scheduling with cumulative deterioration," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 201-219, June.
    16. Lin, Ran & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Liu, Zhixin & Xu, Jun, 2023. "Best possible algorithms for online scheduling on identical batch machines with periodic pulse interruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 53-64.
    17. Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    18. Xiaoqiang Cai & George L. Vairaktarakis, 2012. "Coordination of Outsourced Operations at a Third-Party Facility Subject to Booking, Overtime, and Tardiness Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1436-1450, December.
    19. Lin, Ran & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Oulamara, Ammar, 2023. "Online scheduling on parallel-batch machines with periodic availability constraints and job delivery," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    20. Wan, Guohua & Vakati, Sudheer R. & Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Pinedo, Michael, 2010. "Scheduling two agents with controllable processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 528-539, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:45:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-022-00933-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.