IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v34y2017i1d10.1007_s10878-016-0064-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximation algorithms for k-level stochastic facility location problems

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas P. Melo

    (Universidade Estadual de Campinas)

  • Flávio K. Miyazawa

    (Universidade Estadual de Campinas)

  • Lehilton L. C. Pedrosa

    (Universidade Estadual de Campinas)

  • Rafael C. S. Schouery

    (Universidade Estadual de Campinas)

Abstract

In the k-level facility location problem (FLP), we are given a set of facilities, each associated with one of k levels, and a set of clients. We have to connect each client to a chain of opened facilities spanning all levels, minimizing the sum of opening and connection costs. This paper considers the k-level stochastic FLP, with two stages, when the set of clients is only known in the second stage. There is a set of scenarios, each occurring with a given probability. A facility may be opened in any stage, however, the cost of opening a facility in the second stage depends on the realized scenario. The objective is to minimize the expected total cost. For the stage-constrained variant, when clients must be served by facilities opened in the same stage, we present a $$(4-o(1))$$ ( 4 - o ( 1 ) ) -approximation, improving on the 4-approximation by Wang et al. (Oper Res Lett 39(2):160–161, 2011) for each k. In the case with $$k=2,\,3$$ k = 2 , 3 , the algorithm achieves factors 2.56 and 2.78, resp., which improves the $$(3+\epsilon )$$ ( 3 + ϵ ) -approximation for $$k=2$$ k = 2 by Wu et al. (Theor Comput Sci 562:213–226, 2015). For the non-stage-constrained version, we give the first approximation for the problem, achieving a factor of 3.495 for the case with $$k = 2$$ k = 2 , and $$2k-1+o(1)$$ 2 k - 1 + o ( 1 ) in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas P. Melo & Flávio K. Miyazawa & Lehilton L. C. Pedrosa & Rafael C. S. Schouery, 2017. "Approximation algorithms for k-level stochastic facility location problems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 266-278, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:34:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-016-0064-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-016-0064-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-016-0064-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-016-0064-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George B. Dantzig, 1955. "Linear Programming under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3-4), pages 197-206, 04-07.
    2. Donglei Du & Xing Wang & Dachuan Xu, 2010. "An approximation algorithm for the k-level capacitated facility location problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 361-368, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ortiz-Astorquiza, Camilo & Contreras, Ivan & Laporte, Gilbert, 2018. "Multi-level facility location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 791-805.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Freimer & Jeffrey Linderoth & Douglas Thomas, 2012. "The impact of sampling methods on bias and variance in stochastic linear programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 51-75, January.
    2. Aghayi, Nazila & Maleki, Bentolhoda, 2016. "Efficiency measurement of DMUs with undesirable outputs under uncertainty based on the directional distance function: Application on bank industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 376-387.
    3. J. F. F. Almeida & S. V. Conceição & L. R. Pinto & B. R. P. Oliveira & L. F. Rodrigues, 2022. "Optimal sales and operations planning for integrated steel industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 773-790, August.
    4. Ortiz-Astorquiza, Camilo & Contreras, Ivan & Laporte, Gilbert, 2018. "Multi-level facility location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 791-805.
    5. Kanudia, Amit & Shukla, PR, 1998. "Modelling of Uncertainties and Price Elastic Demands in Energy-environment Planning for India," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 409-423, June.
    6. Arie M. C. A. Koster & Michael Poss, 2018. "Special issue on: robust combinatorial optimization," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 207-209, September.
    7. Rashed Khanjani-Shiraz & Ali Babapour-Azar & Zohreh Hosseini-Noudeh & Panos M. Pardalos, 2022. "Distributionally robust maximum probability shortest path problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 140-167, January.
    8. Walid Ben-Ameur & Adam Ouorou & Guanglei Wang & Mateusz Żotkiewicz, 2018. "Multipolar robust optimization," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(4), pages 395-434, December.
    9. Lambert, David K. & McCarl, Bruce A. & He, Quifen & Kaylen, Michael S. & Rosenthal, Wesley & Chang, Ching-Cheng & Nayda, W.I., 1995. "Uncertain Yields In Sectoral Welfare Analysis: An Application To Global Warming," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Hsien-Chung Wu, 2019. "Numerical Method for Solving the Robust Continuous-Time Linear Programming Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-50, May.
    11. Ketabchi, Saeed & Behboodi-Kahoo, Malihe, 2015. "Augmented Lagrangian method within L-shaped method for stochastic linear programs," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 12-20.
    12. Ceren Tuncer Şakar & Murat Köksalan, 2013. "A stochastic programming approach to multicriteria portfolio optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 299-314, October.
    13. Alexander Engau, 2017. "Proper Efficiency and Tradeoffs in Multiple Criteria and Stochastic Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 119-134, January.
    14. Kallio, Markku & Halme, Merja & Dehghan Hardoroudi, Nasim & Aspara, Jaakko, 2022. "Transparent structured products for retail investors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 752-767.
    15. Zuo, Qiting & Wu, Qingsong & Yu, Lei & Li, Yongping & Fan, Yurui, 2021. "Optimization of uncertain agricultural management considering the framework of water, energy and food," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    16. Guanglei Wang & Hassan Hijazi, 2018. "Mathematical programming methods for microgrid design and operations: a survey on deterministic and stochastic approaches," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 553-608, November.
    17. Pengyu Qian & Zizhuo Wang & Zaiwen Wen, 2015. "A Composite Risk Measure Framework for Decision Making under Uncertainty," Papers 1501.01126, arXiv.org.
    18. Ussama Assad & Muhammad Arshad Shehzad Hassan & Umar Farooq & Asif Kabir & Muhammad Zeeshan Khan & S. Sabahat H. Bukhari & Zain ul Abidin Jaffri & Judit Oláh & József Popp, 2022. "Smart Grid, Demand Response and Optimization: A Critical Review of Computational Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-36, March.
    19. Fei, Xin & Gülpınar, Nalân & Branke, Jürgen, 2019. "Efficient solution selection for two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 918-929.
    20. Hannes Schwarz & Valentin Bertsch & Wolf Fichtner, 2018. "Two-stage stochastic, large-scale optimization of a decentralized energy system: a case study focusing on solar PV, heat pumps and storage in a residential quarter," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(1), pages 265-310, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:34:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-016-0064-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.