IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v24y2019i2d10.1007_s13253-019-00358-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-processing Multiensemble Temperature and Precipitation Forecasts Through an Exchangeable Normal-Gamma Model and Its Tobit Extension

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Courbariaux

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Pierre Barbillon

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Luc Perreault

    (Hydro-Québec Research Institute)

  • Éric Parent

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

Abstract

Meteorological ensemble members are a collection of scenarios for future weather issued by a meteorological center. Such ensembles nowadays form the main source of valuable information for probabilistic forecasting which aims at producing a predictive probability distribution of the quantity of interest instead of a single best guess point-wise estimate. Unfortunately, ensemble members cannot generally be considered as a sample from such a predictive probability distribution without a preliminary post-processing treatment to re-calibrate the ensemble. Two main families of post-processing methods, either competing such as the BMA or collaborative such as the EMOS, can be found in the literature. This paper proposes a mixed-effect model belonging to the collaborative family. The structure of the model is formally justified by Bruno de Finetti’s representation theorem which shows how to construct operational statistical models of ensemble based on judgments of invariance under the relabeling of the members. Its interesting specificities are as follows: (1) exchangeability contributes to parsimony, with an interpretation of the latent pivot of the ensemble in terms of a statistical synthesis of the essential meteorological features of the ensemble members, (2) a multiensemble implementation is straightforward, allowing to take advantage of various information so as to increase the sharpness of the forecasting procedure. Focus is cast onto normal statistical structures, first with a direct application for temperatures, then with its very convenient Tobit extension for precipitation. Inference is performed by expectation maximization (EM) algorithms with both steps leading to explicit analytic expressions in the Gaussian temperature case, and recourse is made to stochastic conditional simulations in the zero-inflated precipitation case. After checking its good behavior on artificial data, the proposed post-processing technique is applied to temperature and precipitation ensemble forecasts produced for lead times from 1 to 9 days over five river basins managed by Hydro-Québec, which ranks among the world’s largest electric companies. These ensemble forecasts, provided by three meteorological global forecast centers (Canadian, USA and European), were extracted from the THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) database. The results indicate that post-processed ensembles are calibrated and generally sharper than the raw ensembles for the five watersheds under study. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear on-line.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Courbariaux & Pierre Barbillon & Luc Perreault & Éric Parent, 2019. "Post-processing Multiensemble Temperature and Precipitation Forecasts Through an Exchangeable Normal-Gamma Model and Its Tobit Extension," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(2), pages 309-345, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:24:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-019-00358-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-019-00358-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-019-00358-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-019-00358-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie Courbariaux & Pierre Barbillon & Éric Parent, 2017. "Water flow probabilistic predictions based on a rainfall–runoff simulator: a two-regime model with variable selection," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 194-219, June.
    2. Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir & Tilmann Gneiting, 2010. "Probabilistic forecasts of wind speed: ensemble model output statistics by using heteroscedastic censored regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 173(2), pages 371-388, April.
    3. Tilmann Gneiting & Fadoua Balabdaoui & Adrian E. Raftery, 2007. "Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(2), pages 243-268, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michaël Zamo & Liliane Bel & Olivier Mestre, 2021. "Sequential aggregation of probabilistic forecasts—Application to wind speed ensemble forecasts," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 202-225, January.
    2. Sebastian Lerch & Sándor Baran, 2017. "Similarity-based semilocal estimation of post-processing models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(1), pages 29-51, January.
    3. Pierre-Julien Trombe & Pierre Pinson & Henrik Madsen, 2012. "A General Probabilistic Forecasting Framework for Offshore Wind Power Fluctuations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-37, March.
    4. Baran, Sándor & Lerch, Sebastian, 2018. "Combining predictive distributions for the statistical post-processing of ensemble forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 477-496.
    5. Reto Stauffer & Jakob W. Messner & Georg J. Mayr & Nikolaus Umlauf & Achim Zeileis, 2016. "Ensemble Post-Processing of Daily Precipitation Sums over Complex Terrain Using Censored High-Resolution Standardized Anomalies," Working Papers 2016-21, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    6. Alonzo, Bastien & Tankov, Peter & Drobinski, Philippe & Plougonven, Riwal, 2020. "Probabilistic wind forecasting up to three months ahead using ensemble predictions for geopotential height," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 515-530.
    7. Peter Tankov & Laura Tinsi, 2021. "Decision making with dynamic probabilistic forecasts," Papers 2106.16047, arXiv.org.
    8. Youjung Kim & Galen Newman, 2019. "Climate Change Preparedness: Comparing Future Urban Growth and Flood Risk in Amsterdam and Houston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Maneesoonthorn, Worapree & Martin, Gael M. & Forbes, Catherine S. & Grose, Simone D., 2012. "Probabilistic forecasts of volatility and its risk premia," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 217-236.
    10. Warne, Anders, 2023. "DSGE model forecasting: rational expectations vs. adaptive learning," Working Paper Series 2768, European Central Bank.
    11. Manuel Gebetsberger & Jakob W. Messner & Georg J. Mayr & Achim Zeileis, 2017. "Estimation methods for non-homogeneous regression models: Minimum continuous ranked probability score vs. maximum likelihood," Working Papers 2017-23, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    12. Lahiri, Kajal & Yang, Liu, 2013. "Forecasting Binary Outcomes," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1025-1106, Elsevier.
    13. Liu, Hui & Duan, Zhu & Chen, Chao, 2020. "Wind speed big data forecasting using time-variant multi-resolution ensemble model with clustering auto-encoder," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    14. Jenny Brynjarsdottir & Jonathan Hobbs & Amy Braverman & Lukas Mandrake, 2018. "Optimal Estimation Versus MCMC for $$\mathrm{{CO}}_{2}$$ CO 2 Retrievals," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(2), pages 297-316, June.
    15. Michael K. Adjemian & Valentina G. Bruno & Michel A. Robe, 2020. "Incorporating Uncertainty into USDA Commodity Price Forecasts," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 696-712, March.
    16. Zhao, Jing & Guo, Zhen-Hai & Su, Zhong-Yue & Zhao, Zhi-Yuan & Xiao, Xia & Liu, Feng, 2016. "An improved multi-step forecasting model based on WRF ensembles and creative fuzzy systems for wind speed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 808-826.
    17. Warne, Anders & Coenen, Günter & Christoffel, Kai, 2010. "Forecasting with DSGE models," Working Paper Series 1185, European Central Bank.
    18. Nowotarski, Jakub & Weron, Rafał, 2018. "Recent advances in electricity price forecasting: A review of probabilistic forecasting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1548-1568.
    19. Tilmann Gneiting & Larissa Stanberry & Eric Grimit & Leonhard Held & Nicholas Johnson, 2008. "Rejoinder on: Assessing probabilistic forecasts of multivariate quantities, with an application to ensemble predictions of surface winds," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(2), pages 256-264, August.
    20. Daniel Cervone & Alex D’Amour & Luke Bornn & Kirk Goldsberry, 2016. "A Multiresolution Stochastic Process Model for Predicting Basketball Possession Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 585-599, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:24:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-019-00358-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.