IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v19y2022i4d10.1007_s12208-021-00320-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When the winner takes it all: online campaign factors influencing the success of donation-based crowdfunding for charitable causes

Author

Listed:
  • Noelia Salido-Andres

    (University of A Coruña)

  • Marta Rey-Garcia

    (University of A Coruña)

  • Luis Ignacio Alvarez-Gonzalez

    (University of Oviedo)

  • Rodolfo Vazquez-Casielles

    (University of Oviedo)

Abstract

This research explores the extent to which campaign factors may influence the success of donation-based crowdfunding (DCF) promoted online with social purposes. Factors that may explain the success of online fundraising campaigns for social causes are firstly identified from previous literature and linked to DCF campaigns through a set of hypotheses: disclosure, imagery, updating, and spreadability. Following, their explanatory capacity is measured through quantitative analysis (logistic regression) based on 360 all-or-nothing campaigns fostered by nonprofits through an online platform. Results confirm the high explanatory capacity of determinants related to the updating and spreadability of the campaign. However, factors related to the disclosure and imagery do not influence their success. This research suggests that the success of online campaigns is closely related to share and update transparent information of those details that contributors deem relevant. Implications are drawn for the effective technical design and management of DCF campaigns channeled through digital media, and specifically for the engagement with potential online communities of funders in digital platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Noelia Salido-Andres & Marta Rey-Garcia & Luis Ignacio Alvarez-Gonzalez & Rodolfo Vazquez-Casielles, 2022. "When the winner takes it all: online campaign factors influencing the success of donation-based crowdfunding for charitable causes," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(4), pages 763-780, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:19:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s12208-021-00320-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-021-00320-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-021-00320-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-021-00320-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Gras & Robert S. Nason & Michael Lerman & Meg Stellini, 2017. "Going offline: broadening crowdfunding research beyond the online context," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 217-237, July.
    2. Indu Khurana, 2021. "Legitimacy and Reciprocal Altruism in Donation-Based Crowdfunding: Evidence from India," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Phillip H. Kim & Mickaël Buffart & Grégoire Croidieu, 2016. "TMI: Signaling credible claims in crowdfunding campaign narratives," Post-Print hal-03188198, HAL.
    4. Camille Lacan & Pierre Desmet, 2017. "Motivations for Participation and e-WOM Among Supporters of Crowdfunding Campaigns," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Androniki Kavoura & Damianos P. Sakas & Petros Tomaras (ed.), Strategic Innovative Marketing, pages 315-321, Springer.
    5. Susan R. Cockrell & Dan W. Meyer & Alan D. Smith, 2016. "Electronic intervention and platforms and their impacts on crowdfunding behaviour," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(3), pages 263-286.
    6. Renata V. Klafke & Paulo M. Gomes & Demétrio Mendonça Junior & Simone R. Didonet & Ana M. Toaldo, 2021. "Engagement in social networks: a multi-method study in non-profits organizations," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(2), pages 295-315, June.
    7. Moonhee Cho & Laura L. Lemon & Abbey B. Levenshus & Courtney C. Childers, 2019. "Current students as university donors?: determinants in college students’ intentions to donate and share information about university crowdfunding efforts," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 16(1), pages 23-41, March.
    8. Snyder, Jeremy & Mathers, Annalise & Crooks, Valorie A., 2016. "Fund my treatment!: A call for ethics-focused social science research into the use of crowdfunding for medical care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 27-30.
    9. Jarrett E K Byrnes & Jai Ranganathan & Barbara L E Walker & Zen Faulkes, 2014. "To Crowdfund Research, Scientists Must Build an Audience for Their Work," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-29, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bataoui, Soffien & Boch, Emmanuelle, 2023. "The role of socially rich photos in generating favorable donation behavior on charity websites," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renwick, Matthew J. & Mossialos, Elias, 2017. "Crowdfunding our health: Economic risks and benefits," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 48-56.
    2. Laura Grassi & Simone Fantaccini, 2022. "An overview of Fintech applications to solve the puzzle of health care funding: state-of-the-art in medical crowdfunding," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Christian Handke & Carolina Dalla Chiesa, 2022. "The art of crowdfunding arts and innovation: the cultural economic perspective," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(2), pages 249-284, June.
    4. Rotem Shneor & Urszula Mrzygłód & Joanna Adamska-Mieruszewska & Anna Fornalska-Skurczyńska, 2022. "The role of social trust in reward crowdfunding campaigns’ design and success," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1103-1118, September.
    5. Diandian Xiang & Leinan Zhang & Qiuyan Tao & Yonggui Wang & Shuang Ma, 2019. "Informational or emotional appeals in crowdfunding message strategy: an empirical investigation of backers’ support decisions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1046-1063, November.
    6. Agnieszka Szewczyk & Zbigniew Stempnakowski, 2021. "Social Energy as the Driving Force behind Crowdfunding—Analysis and Classification of Selected Attributes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-32, September.
    7. Maurer, Joshua D. & Creek, Steven A. & Allison, Thomas H. & Bendickson, Joshua S. & Sahaym, Arvin, 2023. "Affiliation rhetoric and digital orientation in crowdfunding appeals," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    8. Fatemeh Maleki & Seyed Mohsen Hosseini, 2020. "Charity donation intention via m-payment apps: donor-related, m-payment system-related, or charity brand-related factors, which one is overkill?," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 17(4), pages 409-443, December.
    9. Igra, Mark & Kenworthy, Nora & Luchsinger, Cadence & Jung, Jin-Kyu, 2021. "Crowdfunding as a response to COVID-19: Increasing inequities at a time of crisis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    10. Carolin Bock & Sven Siebeneicher & Jens Rockel, 2022. "The “C” in crowdfunding is for co-financing: exploring participative co-financing, a complement of novel and traditional bank financing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(9), pages 1559-1602, November.
    11. Edgar Cambaza, 2023. "The Role of FinTech in Sustainable Healthcare Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Review," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Ren, Jie & Raghupathi, Viju & Raghupathi, Wullianallur, 2021. "Exploring the Factors that Determine the Success of Litigation Crowdfunding: Implications for Social Justice," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Chan, Ho Fai & Moy, Naomi & Schaffner, Markus & Torgler, Benno, 2021. "The effects of money saliency and sustainability orientation on reward based crowdfunding success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 443-455.
    14. Bela Florenthal & Manar Awad, 2021. "A cross-cultural comparison of millennials’ engagement with and donation to nonprofits: a hybrid U&G and TAM framework," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(4), pages 629-657, December.
    15. Wasike, Ben, 2022. "When the influencer says jump! How influencer signaling affects engagement with COVID-19 misinformation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    16. O’Donnell, Jonathan, 2022. "Administration of crowdfunding at Australian universities," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 33-42.
    17. Lingfei Deng & Qiang Ye & DaPeng Xu & Wenjun Sun & Guangxin Jiang, 2022. "A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-70, December.
    18. Yuliya Snihur & Llewellyn D. W. Thomas & Raghu Garud & Nelson Phillips, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Framing: A Literature Review and Future Research Directions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 578-606, May.
    19. Moysidou, Krystallia & Cohen Chen, Smadar, 2023. "Inducing collective action intentions for healthcare reform through medical crowdfunding framing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    20. Nora Kenworthy & Zhihang Dong & Anne Montgomery & Emily Fuller & Lauren Berliner, 2020. "A cross-sectional study of social inequities in medical crowdfunding campaigns in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:19:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s12208-021-00320-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.