IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/intemj/v19y2023i2d10.1007_s11365-023-00844-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship-building in the post-acceleration phase of corporate accelerators: empirical evidence from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Kramer

    (HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management)

  • Dominik K. Kanbach

    (HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management
    Woxsen University)

Abstract

Corporate accelerators have become a relevant intermediary that connects startups and corporations. Their strategic goal is to establish close relationships between startups and corporations that add value for both parties in the long term. While in principle startups go through an acceleration phase successfully, they may struggle to build meaningful relationships with the accelerator’s corporate parent thereafter. In research, the post-acceleration phase and its challenges for corporations and startups has not been adequately addressed to date. Therefore, the goal of this article is to shed light on how corporations and startups collaborate after startups leave an accelerator programme, and which factors hinder successful relationship-building. Grounding on 21 corporate accelerator cases containing data from 99 semi-structured interviews with corporate accelerator managers and startup alumni of accelerator programmes, we present different forms of post-programme collaboration and outline obstacles of post-programme relationship-building. Our results emphasise a key role of business units in successful relationship-building and indicate legitimacy problems of accelerators within its corporate organisation. We also provide guidance for corporations, accelerators, and startups on how to increase the success of post-programme collaboration by demonstrating manifold challenges of post-programme collaboration and showing ways how to overcome them.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Kramer & Dominik K. Kanbach, 2023. "Relationship-building in the post-acceleration phase of corporate accelerators: empirical evidence from Germany," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 755-779, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:19:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11365-023-00844-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11365-023-00844-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11365-023-00844-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11365-023-00844-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 1965. "Intergovernmental Maritime Consultative Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 120-122, January.
    2. Anonymous, 1965. "Organization of American States," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 145-150, January.
    3. Del Sarto, Nicola & Isabelle, Diane A. & Di Minin, Alberto, 2020. "The role of accelerators in firm survival: An fsQCA analysis of Italian startups," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    4. Gonzalez-Uribe, Juanita & Reyes, Santiago, 2021. "Identifying and boosting “gazelles”: evidence from business accelerators," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103145, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Anonymous, 1965. "Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 150-153, January.
    6. Sarfraz Mian & Wadid Lamine & Alain Fayolle, 2016. "Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge," Post-Print hal-02014389, HAL.
    7. Fecher, Florian & Winding, Johanna & Hutter, Katja & Füller, Johann, 2020. "Innovation labs from a participants' perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 567-576.
    8. Shankar, Raj K. & Clausen, Tommy H., 2020. "Scale quickly or fail fast: An inductive study of acceleration," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Bugl, Benjamin M. & Balz, Frank P. & Kanbach, Dominik K., 2022. "Leveraging smart capital through corporate venture capital: A typology of value creation for new venture firms," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    10. Tobias Gutmann & Cornelius Maas & Dominik Kanbach & Stephan Stubner, 2020. "Startups in a corporate accelerator: what is satisfying, what is relevant and what can corporates improve?," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(6), pages 413-442.
    11. González-Uribe, Juanita & Reyes, Santiago, 2021. "Identifying and boosting “Gazelles”: Evidence from business accelerators," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 260-287.
    12. Susan Cohen, 2013. "What Do Accelerators Do? Insights from Incubators and Angels," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 8(3-4), pages 19-25, December.
    13. Ross Brown & Suzanne Mawson & Neil Lee & Lauren Peterson, 2019. "Start-up factories, transnational entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial ecosystems: unpacking the lure of start-up accelerator programmes," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 885-904, May.
    14. Caccamo, Marta & Beckman, Sara, 2022. "Leveraging accelerator spaces to foster knowledge communities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    15. Anonymous, 1965. "International Civil Aviation Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 129-131, January.
    16. Sarfraz Mian & Wadid Lamine & Alain Fayolle, 2016. "Technology Business Incubation : An overview of the state of knowledge," Post-Print hal-02313371, HAL.
    17. Kuebart, Andreas & Ibert, Oliver, 2019. "Beyond territorial conceptions of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(2-4), pages 118-133.
    18. Anonymous, 1965. "Food and Agriculture Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 112-120, January.
    19. Lydia Canovas-Saiz & Isidre March-Chordà & Rosa Maria Yagüe-Perales, 2021. "A quantitative-based model to assess seed accelerators’ performance," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3-4), pages 332-352, March.
    20. Autio, Erkko & Kenney, Martin & Mustar, Philippe & Siegel, Don & Wright, Mike, 2014. "Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1097-1108.
    21. Julie M. Hite & William S. Hesterly, 2001. "The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 275-286, March.
    22. Anonymous, 1965. "International Labor Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 131-137, January.
    23. Yael V. Hochberg, 2016. "Accelerating Entrepreneurs and Ecosystems: The Seed Accelerator Model," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 25-51.
    24. Kohler, Thomas, 2016. "Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 347-357.
    25. Anonymous, 1965. "Warsaw Treaty Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 1075-1076, October.
    26. Shiri M Breznitz & Qiantao Zhang, 2019. "Fostering the growth of student start-ups from university accelerators: an entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(4), pages 855-873.
    27. Cohen, Susan & Fehder, Daniel C. & Hochberg, Yael V. & Murray, Fiona, 2019. "The design of startup accelerators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1781-1797.
    28. Mian, Sarfraz & Lamine, Wadid & Fayolle, Alain, 2016. "Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 50, pages 1-12.
    29. Shankar, Raj K. & Shepherd, Dean A., 2019. "Accelerating strategic fit or venture emergence: Different paths adopted by corporate accelerators," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1-1.
    30. Sandy Yu, 2020. "How Do Accelerators Impact the Performance of High-Technology Ventures?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 530-552, February.
    31. Toby E. Stuart, 2000. "Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high‐technology industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(8), pages 791-811, August.
    32. Fei Qin & Mike Wright & Jian Gao, 2019. "Accelerators and intra-ecosystem variety: how entrepreneurial agency influences venture development in a time-compressed support program," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(4), pages 961-975.
    33. Anonymous, 1965. "Caribbean Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 1070-1073, October.
    34. Benjamin L. Hallen & Susan L. Cohen & Christopher B. Bingham, 2020. "Do Accelerators Work? If So, How?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 378-414, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    2. Gonzalez-Uribe, Juanita & Hmaddi, Ouafaa, 2022. "The multi-dimensional impacts of business accelerators: what does the research tell us?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115461, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Moritz, Alexandra & Naulin, Tamara & Lutz, Eva, 2022. "Accelerators as drivers of coopetition among early-stage startups," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Navid Mohammadi & Shaghayegh Sakhteh, 2023. "Start-up accelerator value chain: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 661-694, June.
    5. Thomas Ulmer & Ulrich Pape, 2022. "Streamliners, Switchmen and Bridge Builders: About the Mechanisms and Uniqueness of Accelerator Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Bańka Michał & Salwin Mariusz & Waszkiewicz Aneta Ewa & Rychlik Szymon & Kukurba Maria, 2022. "Startup Accelerators," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 58(1), pages 80-118, March.
    7. Emil Lucian Crișan & Irina Iulia Salanță & Ioana Natalia Beleiu & Ovidiu Niculae Bordean & Raluca Bunduchi, 2021. "A systematic literature review on accelerators," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 62-89, February.
    8. Kuebart, Andreas, 2022. "Open creative labs as functional infrastructure for entrepreneurial ecosystems: Using sequence analysis to explore tempo-spatial trajectories of startups in Berlin," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    9. Domicián Máté & Ni Made Estiyanti & Adam Novotny, 2024. "How to support innovative small firms? Bibliometric analysis and visualization of start-up incubation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Michal Banka & Mariusz Salwin & Dariusz Masłowski & Szymon Rychlik & Maria Kukurba, 2022. "Start-up Accelerator: State of the Art and Future Directions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 477-510.
    11. Gisca, Oxana & Matinmikko-Blue, Marja & Ahokangas, Petri & Gordon, Jillian & Yrjölä, Seppo, 2023. "A regulatory perspective on local mobile communication network business in Europe: legitimacy considerations," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277966, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    12. Juhee Kim & Minju Shin, 2022. "What Drives Social Enterprises to Form Sustainable Values? The Effects of Normative Identity and Social Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Saba Sharif, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Sustainability on Firm Growth: Evidence from USA," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Fink, Alexander A. & Klöckner, Maximilian & Räder, Tobias & Wagner, Stephan M., 2022. "Supply chain management accelerators: Types, objectives, and key design features," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. J. Piet Hausberg & Sabrina Korreck, 2020. "Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 151-176, February.
    16. Charlene L. Nicholls-Nixon & Dave Valliere & Steven A. Gedeon & Sean Wise, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the lifecycle of university business incubators: An integrative case study," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 809-837, June.
    17. Benlu Hai & Ximing Yin & Jie Xiong & Jin Chen, 2022. "Could more innovation output bring better financial performance? The role of financial constraints," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Shankar, Raj K. & Clausen, Tommy H., 2020. "Scale quickly or fail fast: An inductive study of acceleration," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    19. Michał Bańka & Mariusz Salwin & Maria Kukurba & Szymon Rychlik & Joanna Kłos & Monika Sychowicz, 2022. "Start-Up Accelerators and Their Impact on Sustainability: Literature Analysis and Case Studies from the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-30, October.
    20. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:19:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11365-023-00844-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.