IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v19y2021i1d10.1007_s10257-020-00479-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated framework of change management for social CRM implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Mona Jami Pour

    (Hazrat-e Masoumeh University (HMU))

  • Mahnaz Hosseinzadeh

    (University of Tehran)

Abstract

Social Customer Relationship Management (CRM) is a new paradigm in e-business environment that enables businesses to collaboratively manage customer expectations via social technologies. It combines the capabilities of social media with traditional CRM software in order that businesses better engage their customers. Implementation of social CRM systems continues to drive changes in organizations; however, the implementation attempts often lead to failure, partially due to the lack of readiness to change or resistance toward change. This study aims at developing a framework to determine change management requirements for successful implementation of social CRM in the organizations. To this end, a comprehensive literature review is done and semi-structured interviews are conducted to develop the initial framework. Best–Worst Method is applied to calculate the weights of each change requirement. Finally, the stage of change management process to which each of the identified sub-factors is related are determined. The proposed framework contains requirements such as ‘content of change’, ‘context of change’, ‘individual’, and ‘process’; for each, a set of sub-factors is defined. It suggests the change management requirements of social CRM implementation based on the sequential stages of Lewin’s model. The proposed framework is presented as a guideline for successful implementation of social CRM.

Suggested Citation

  • Mona Jami Pour & Mahnaz Hosseinzadeh, 2021. "An integrated framework of change management for social CRM implementation," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 43-75, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:19:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-020-00479-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-020-00479-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-020-00479-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-020-00479-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Efraim Turban & Jon Outland & David King & Jae Kyu Lee & Ting-Peng Liang & Deborrah C. Turban, 2018. "Electronic Commerce 2018," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, edition 9, number 978-3-319-58715-8, August.
    2. Inbal Yahav & David G. Schwartz & Yaara Welcman, 2020. "The journey to engaged customer community: Evidential social CRM maturity model in Twitter," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 397-416, May.
    3. Mona Jami Pour & Zahra Lotfiyan, 2020. "A new framework of electronic word-of-mouth in social networking sites: the system-based approach," International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 48-70.
    4. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    5. V. Kumar & Werner Reinartz, 2018. "Customer Relationship Management," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, edition 3, number 978-3-662-55381-7, June.
    6. Li, Yibai & Wang, Xuequn & Lin, Xiaolin & Hajli, Mohammad, 2018. "Seeking and sharing health information on social media: A net valence model and cross-cultural comparison," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 28-40.
    7. Joris Van der Voet & Ben S. Kuipers & Sandra Groeneveld, 2016. "Implementing Change in Public Organizations: The relationship between leadership and affective commitment to change in a public sector context," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 842-865, July.
    8. Fidel, Pilar & Schlesinger, Walesska & Cervera, Amparo, 2015. "Collaborating to innovate: Effects on customer knowledge management and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1426-1428.
    9. Shah, Naimatullah & Irani, Zahir & Sharif, Amir M., 2017. "Big data in an HR context: Exploring organizational change readiness, employee attitudes and behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 366-378.
    10. Ren, Jingzheng & Liang, Hanwei & Chan, Felix T.S., 2017. "Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 29-39.
    11. Malthouse, Edward C. & Haenlein, Michael & Skiera, Bernd & Wege, Egbert & Zhang, Michael, 2013. "Managing Customer Relationships in the Social Media Era: Introducing the Social CRM House," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 270-280.
    12. Wu, Chih-Wen, 2016. "The performance impact of social media in the chain store industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5310-5316.
    13. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    14. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lamrhari, Soumaya & Ghazi, Hamid El & Oubrich, Mourad & Faker, Abdellatif El, 2022. "A social CRM analytic framework for improving customer retention, acquisition, and conversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jairo Ortega & Sarbast Moslem & János Tóth & Tamás Péter & Juan Palaguachi & Mario Paguay, 2020. "Using Best Worst Method for Sustainable Park and Ride Facility Location," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Mališa Žižović & Dragan Pamučar & Goran Ćirović & Miodrag M. Žižović & Boža D. Miljković, 2020. "A Model for Determining Weight Coefficients by Forming a Non-Decreasing Series at Criteria Significance Levels (NDSL)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo & Huiru Zhao, 2018. "Selecting the Optimal Micro-Grid Planning Program Using a Novel Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Based on Grey Cumulative Prospect Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Marchand, André & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Flemming, Jan, 2021. "Social media resources and capabilities as strategic determinants of social media performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 549-571.
    5. Meisam Ranjbari & Zahra Shams Esfandabadi & Simone Domenico Scagnelli & Peer-Olaf Siebers & Francesco Quatraro, 2021. "Recovery agenda for sustainable development post COVID-19 at the country level: developing a fuzzy action priority surface," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16646-16673, November.
    6. Jairo Ortega & Sarbast Moslem & Juan Palaguachi & Martin Ortega & Tiziana Campisi & Vincenza Torrisi, 2021. "An Integrated Multi Criteria Decision Making Model for Evaluating Park-and-Ride Facility Location Issue: A Case Study for Cuenca City in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Penjani Hopkins Nyimbili & Turan Erden, 2021. "Comparative evaluation of GIS-based best–worst method (BWM) for emergency facility planning: perspectives from two decision-maker groups," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 1031-1067, January.
    8. Mi, Xiaomei & Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang & Shen, Wenjing & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 205-225.
    9. Haoran Zhao & Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2018. "Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Electricity Grid Corporations Employing a Novel MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Lamrhari, Soumaya & Ghazi, Hamid El & Oubrich, Mourad & Faker, Abdellatif El, 2022. "A social CRM analytic framework for improving customer retention, acquisition, and conversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Shih-Chia Chang & Ming-Tsang Lu & Mei-Jen Chen & Li-Hua Huang, 2021. "Evaluating the Application of CSR in the High-Tech Industry during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Shojaei, Payam & Seyed Haeri, Seyed Amin & Mohammadi, Sahar, 2018. "Airports evaluation and ranking model using Taguchi loss function, best-worst method and VIKOR technique," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 4-13.
    13. Peipei You & Sen Guo & Haoran Zhao & Huiru Zhao, 2017. "Operation Performance Evaluation of Power Grid Enterprise Using a Hybrid BWM-TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Dragan Pamučar & Ljubomir Gigović & Zoran Bajić & Miljojko Janošević, 2017. "Location Selection for Wind Farms Using GIS Multi-Criteria Hybrid Model: An Approach Based on Fuzzy and Rough Numbers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-23, July.
    15. van de Kaa, Geerten & Janssen, Marijn & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Standards battles for business-to-government data exchange: Identifying success factors for standard dominance using the Best Worst Method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 182-189.
    16. Nour El Houda Ben Amor & Mohamed Nabil Mzoughi, 2023. "Do Millennials’ Motives for Using Snapchat Influence the Effectiveness of Snap Ads?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    17. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Junnan Wu & Xin Liu & Dianqi Pan & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Kai Ke, 2023. "Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Pushparenu Bhattacharjee & Syed Abou Iltaf Hussain & V. Dey & U. K. Mandal, 2023. "Failure mode and effects analysis for submersible pump component using proportionate risk assessment model: a case study in the power plant of Agartala," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1778-1798, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:19:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-020-00479-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.