IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v13y2022i3d10.1007_s13198-021-01511-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of convolutional neural network under nonlinear excitation function in the construction of employee incentive and constraint model

Author

Listed:
  • Shenglei Pei

    (Qinghai Minzu University)

  • Lijuan Ye

    (Qinghai Minzu University)

  • Wei Zhou

    (Xining Big Data Service Management Bureau)

Abstract

It is aimed to explore the relationship between the incentive constraint model and corporate performance, and expand the application of neural networks in the incentive mechanism, thereby providing a direction for the innovation development of the enterprise to a certain extent. Based on the convolutional neural network (CNN), the construction and practice of the employee incentive constraint model are discussed. First, fully combining the excellent performance of the nonlinear excitation function in CNN, a CNN-based PReLUs-Sigmoid (P-S) nonlinear excitation function is proposed and compared with several excitation functions. Second, the P-S nonlinear excitation function is integrated. Based on the law of diminishing marginal returns, the construction of the employee incentive constraint model is completed. Finally, companies with and without equity constraint mechanisms are selected as the research sample to analyze the relationship between the implementation of the incentive constraint mechanism and the performance level of the company. The results show that the P-S nonlinear excitation function based on CNN has both sparse expression ability and smooth nonlinear mapping correction ability. Also, it has applicability in the optimal solution. When the employee’s work effort is $$x = 2.5743$$ x = 2.5743 and excitation coefficient is $$\beta^{*} = 0.8285$$ β ∗ = 0.8285 , the optimal returns can be obtained between the enterprise organization and employees under this incentive constraint model. Before and after the implementation of the equity incentive constraint mechanism, there are significant differences in the performance level of enterprises. The implementation of the incentive constraint mechanism is beneficial to the improvement of enterprise performance level. The employee incentive constraint model constructed expands the application of CNN in the incentive mechanism and provides a direction for the development of enterprise performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Shenglei Pei & Lijuan Ye & Wei Zhou, 2022. "Application of convolutional neural network under nonlinear excitation function in the construction of employee incentive and constraint model," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(3), pages 1142-1153, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01511-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-021-01511-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-021-01511-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-021-01511-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A., 2019. "Cartel stability under quality differentiation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 70-73.
    2. Wenhua Di & Daniel L. Millimet, 2017. "Targeted business incentives and the debt behavior of households," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1115-1142, May.
    3. Jeffrey Meyer & Venkatesh Shankar & Leonard L. Berry, 2018. "Pricing hybrid bundles by understanding the drivers of willingness to pay," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 497-515, May.
    4. Dona Muin & Susi Ari Kristina & Yayi Suryo Prabandari & Satibi Satibi, 2019. "Factors Affecting Pharmacist’s Performance Based on Motivation Theory: A Systematic Review," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Karl Shell & Yu Zhang, 2019. "On sunspots, bank runs, and Glass–Steagall," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 15(1), pages 13-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A. & Saulle, Riccardo D., 2020. "Cartel formation with quality differentiation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 36-50.
    2. Innocenti, Federico & Menicucci, Domenico, 2021. "Partial compatibility in oligopoly," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 351-378.
    3. Iwan Bos & Marco A. Marini, 2022. "Collusion in quality‐segmented markets," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(2), pages 293-323, April.
    4. James Peck & Abolfazi Setayesh, 2023. "Bank Runs and the Optimality of Limited Banking," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 47, pages 100-110, January.
    5. Thanos Athanasopoulos & Burak Dindaroglu & Georgios Petropoulos, 2021. "Stability of collusion and quality differentiation- a Nash bargaining approach," Working Papers 43226, Bruegel.
    6. Guenther, Miriam & Guenther, Peter, 2021. "The complex firm financial effects of customer satisfaction improvements," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 639-662.
    7. Stanislav Stoykov & Ivan Kostov, 2023. "Price Competition with Differentiated Products on a Two-Dimensional Plane: The Impact of Partial Cartel on Firms’ Profits and Behavior," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Neelanjan Sen & Priyansh Minocha & Arghya Dutta, 2023. "Technology licensing and collusion," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 19(3), pages 694-752, September.
    9. Ohlwein, Martin, 2022. "Same but different - The effect of the unit of measure on the valuation of a unit price," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    10. Leonardo Madio & Aldo Pignataro, 2022. "Collusion sustainability with a capacity constrained firm," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0295, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    11. Ranjit M. Christopher & Fernando S. Machado, 2019. "Consumer response to design variations in pay-what-you-want pricing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 879-898, September.
    12. Leonardo Madio & Aldo Pignataro, 2022. "Collusion Sustainability with a Capacity Constrained Firm," CESifo Working Paper Series 10170, CESifo.
    13. Amit Gayer, 2023. "Duopoly and Endogenous Single Product Quality Strategies," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Katharina Keller & Christian Schlereth & Oliver Hinz, 2021. "Sample-based longitudinal discrete choice experiments: preferences for electric vehicles over time," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 482-500, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:13:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01511-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.