IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/gjofsm/v20y2019i2d10.1007_s40171-018-0203-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Flexibility in Designing CRM Solution

Author

Listed:
  • Himanshu Dutt

    (DMI Finance Pvt. Ltd.
    Jamia Millia Islamia)

  • Kavita Chauhan

    (Jamia Millia Islamia)

Abstract

The role of flexibility is eminent in designing a CRM solution. But the challenge is how to embed it. We must know where exactly to apply it. The purpose of this research therefore exactly is to identify the linkages between flexibility and CRM solution design and suggest how and where the flexibility can be embedded in this design. It explores the concept of flexible systems management and the CRM system as ‘independent’ and ‘interrelated’ set of activities based on systems-thinking concept. The research identifies two sets of flexibility affecting the CRM design—one, the flexibility of CRM process (and modules within) and two, the flexibility of CRM design and its users. The research also outlines what CRM features are critical for applying flexibility. We used Delphi method to prepare a ranking of such critical features for a successful CRM design. Based on this, we created a hypothetical used case for building and mapping flexibility to each CRM feature (from the six identified) plotted between flexibility and rigidity quadrant. Features ‘high on flexibility’ are recommended to ‘stretch further’, and those skewed towards rigidity are advised to ‘control or divest’. This study will be beneficial to practitioners looking forward to implementing CRM or those already underway. It should help these practising professionals in thinking ways to build flexibility, do scoping for their CRM project like which variables (read functionalities) to focus and assess how to leverage flexibility to meet productivity goals and business requirements of the present and the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Himanshu Dutt & Kavita Chauhan, 2019. "Using Flexibility in Designing CRM Solution," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(2), pages 103-116, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:20:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s40171-018-0203-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s40171-018-0203-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40171-018-0203-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40171-018-0203-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gil, Nuno & Tether, Bruce S., 2011. "Project risk management and design flexibility: Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 415-428, April.
    2. Paul S. Adler & Barbara Goldoftas & David I. Levine, 1999. "Flexibility Versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 43-68, February.
    3. Mile Katic & Renu Agarwal, 2018. "The Flexibility Paradox: Achieving Ambidexterity in High-Variety, Low-Volume Manufacturing," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(1), pages 69-86, March.
    4. Nitin S. Solke & T. P. Singh, 2018. "Analysis of Relationship Between Manufacturing Flexibility and Lean Manufacturing Using Structural Equation Modelling," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(2), pages 139-157, June.
    5. Jansen, J.J.P. & van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W., 2005. "Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How do Organizational Antecedents matter?," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-025-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Hallgren, Mattias & Olhager, Jan, 2009. "Flexibility configurations: Empirical analysis of volume and product mix flexibility," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 746-756, August.
    7. Fabricio Eidelwein & Fabio Antonio Sartori Piran & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Aline Dresch & Luis Henrique Rodrigues, 2018. "Exploratory Analysis of Modularization Strategy Based on the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(2), pages 111-122, June.
    8. Chin-Lung Hsu & Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin, 2016. "Factors affecting the adoption of cloud services in enterprises," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 791-822, November.
    9. Finnegan, David J. & Currie, Wendy L., 2010. "A multi-layered approach to CRM implementation: An integration perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 153-167, April.
    10. Stephen C. Graves & Brian T. Tomlin, 2003. "Process Flexibility in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(7), pages 907-919, July.
    11. Chang, Woojung & Park, Jeong Eun & Chaiy, Seoil, 2010. "How does CRM technology transform into organizational performance? A mediating role of marketing capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 849-855, August.
    12. Henk W. Volberda, 1996. "Toward the Flexible Form: How to Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 359-374, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ehsan Samiei & Jafar Habibi, 2020. "The Mutual Relation Between Enterprise Resource Planning and Knowledge Management: A Review," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(1), pages 53-66, March.
    2. Muhammad Farooq & Valliappan Raju, 2019. "Want to Stay the Market Leader in the Era of Transformative Marketing? Keep the Customers Satisfied!," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(3), pages 257-266, September.
    3. Nakul Parameswar & Sanjay Dhir & Sushil, 2020. "Interpretive Ranking of Choice of Interaction of Parent Firms Post-International Joint Venture Termination using TISM-IRP," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(1), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Adedapo Adewunmi Oluwatayo & Olufunmilayo Adetoro, 2020. "Influence of Employee Attributes, Work Context and Human Resource Management Practices on Employee Job Engagement," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(4), pages 295-308, December.
    5. Rohit Kumar Singh & Sachin Modgil & Padmanav Acharya, 2019. "Assessment of Supply Chain Flexibility Using System Dynamics Modeling," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(1), pages 39-63, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Baaij, M.G. & Volberda, H.W., 2005. "How Knowledge Accumulation changed the Competitive Advantage of Strategy Consulting Firms," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-026-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Brion, Sébastien & Mothe, Caroline & Sabatier, Mareva, 2007. "What impacts more on innovation : Organizational context or individual competences ?," MPRA Paper 10595, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Justin J. P. Jansen & Michiel P. Tempelaar & Frans A. J. van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2009. "Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 797-811, August.
    4. Sébastien Brion & Caroline Mothe & Maréva Sabatier, 2010. "The Impact Of Organisational Context And Competences On Innovation Ambidexterity," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 151-178.
    5. Thomé, Antonio Márcio T. & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe & Pires, Sílvio R.I. & Ceryno, Paula & Klingebiel, Katja, 2014. "A multi-tier study on supply chain flexibility in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 91-105.
    6. QiJie Xiao, 2018. "Control or Autonomy? A Case Study of two Organizational Forms in the Zhangjiakou Internal Migrant Organization," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 207-221, June.
    7. Chiara Franco & Alberto Marzucchi & Sandro Montresor, 2012. "Absorptive capacity, innovation cooperation and human-capital. Evidence from 3 European countries," JRC Research Reports JRC77090, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Henk W. Volberda & Nicolai J. Foss & Marjorie A. Lyles, 2010. "PERSPECTIVE---Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 931-951, August.
    9. O'Reilly, Charles A., III & Tushman, Michael L., 2013. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future," Research Papers 2130, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    10. Mohammed Alamgir & Mohammad Shamsuddoha, 2015. "Customer Relationship Management (Crm) Success Factors: An Exploratory Study," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 4(1), pages 1-7, January.
    11. Arie Y. Lewin & Silvia Massini & Carine Peeters, 2011. "Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 81-98, February.
    12. Paula A. Jarzabkowski & Jane K. Lê & Martha S. Feldman, 2012. "Toward a Theory of Coordinating: Creating Coordinating Mechanisms in Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 907-927, August.
    13. Mikhail Yurievich Ryabchikov & Elena Sergeevna Ryabchikova, 2022. "Big Data-Driven Assessment of Proposals to Improve Enterprise Flexibility Through Control Options Untested in Practice," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(1), pages 43-74, March.
    14. Sara Alonso-Muñoz & Rocío González-Sánchez & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando Enrique García-Muiña, 2021. "Building Exploitation Routines in the Circular Supply Chain to Obtain Radical Innovations," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Linda Argote & Henrich R. Greve, 2007. "A Behavioral Theory of the Firm ---40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 337-349, June.
    16. Rene M. Bakker & Joris Knoben, 2015. "Built to Last or Meant to End: Intertemporal Choice in Strategic Alliance Portfolios," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 256-276, February.
    17. Juha Uotila, 2018. "Punctuated equilibrium or ambidexterity: dynamics of incremental and radical organizational change over time," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(1), pages 131-148.
    18. Avimanyu Datta, 2011. "Combining Networks, Ambidexterity and Absorptive Capacity to Explain Commercialization of Innovations: A Theoretical Model from Review and Extension," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(4), pages 2-25, December.
    19. Tom J. M. Mom & Frans A. J. van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2009. "Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 812-828, August.
    20. Susanne Hügel & Markus Kreutzer & Nico B. Rottke, 2019. "Firm Innovativeness In Service Industries: A Construct Validation In The External Environment And Industry Structure Contexts," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-57, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:20:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s40171-018-0203-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.