IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/epolin/v49y2022i3d10.1007_s40812-022-00226-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RegTech in public and private sectors: the nexus between data, technology and regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Grassi

    (Politecnico di Milano)

  • Davide Lanfranchi

    (Politecnico di Milano)

Abstract

Higher regulatory compliance requirements, fast and continuous changes in regulations and high digital dynamics in the financial markets are powering RegTech (regulatory technology), defined as technology‐enabled innovation applied to the world of regulation, compliance, risk management, reporting and supervision. This work builds on a systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis of the literature on RegTech, its influential papers and authors, its main areas of research, its past and its future. The resulting multi-dimensional framework bridges across four main dimensions, starting with regulation and technology, where one or more regulations, not necessarily financial ones, are addressed with the support of technologies (e.g. artificial intelligence, DLT, blockchain, smart contracts, API). Data play a central role, as sharing them enables data ecosystems, where additional value can be attained by each market participant, while data automation and machine-readable regulations empower regulators to pull data directly from the banks’ systems and combine these data with data obtained directly from customers or other external sources. Several applications emerge, both for regulated entities, covering matters of compliance, monitoring, risk management, reporting and operations, as well as for authorities, which can leverage on RegTech (SupTech) solutions to make policies, to undertake their authorising, supervising and enforcement operations, for monitoring and controlling purposes, and even to issue fines automatically. As a consequence, stakeholders can reap a series of benefits, such as higher efficiency and effectiveness, accuracy, transparency and lower compliance costs but also risks, such as cyber risk, algorithmic biases, and dehumanization.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Grassi & Davide Lanfranchi, 2022. "RegTech in public and private sectors: the nexus between data, technology and regulation," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 441-479, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:epolin:v:49:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s40812-022-00226-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40812-022-00226-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40812-022-00226-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40812-022-00226-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liudmila Zavolokina & Mateusz Dolata & Gerhard Schwabe, 2016. "The FinTech phenomenon: antecedents of financial innovation perceived by the popular press," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Johan Solms, 2021. "Integrating Regulatory Technology (RegTech) into the digital transformation of a bank Treasury," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 191-207, September.
    3. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    4. Azleen Ilias & Erlane K Ghani & Zubir Azhar, 2019. "Factors Influencing Knowledge and Persuasion of Financial Regulators in the XBRL Adoption Process: The Technological Perspective," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 170-180, May.
    5. Steve Yang & Fang-Chun Liu & Xiaodi Zhu, 2018. "The Impact of XBRL on Financial Statement Structural Comparability," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Rita Lamboglia & Andrea Cardoni & Renata Paola Dameri & Daniela Mancini (ed.), Network, Smart and Open, pages 193-206, Springer.
    6. Michael Hall, C., 2011. "Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 16-27.
    7. Choi, Dongjoon & Lee, Hansol & Lee, Ho-Young & Park, Hyun-Young, 2021. "The association between human resource investment in IT controls over financial reporting and investment efficiency," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    8. Moshirian, Fariborz, 2011. "The global financial crisis and the evolution of markets, institutions and regulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 502-511, March.
    9. Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem & Papaioannou, Elias & Perri, Fabrizio, 2013. "Global banks and crisis transmission," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 495-510.
    10. Petros Kavassalis & Harald Stieber & Wolfgang Breymann & Keith Saxton & Francis Joseph Gross, 2018. "An innovative RegTech approach to financial risk monitoring and supervisory reporting," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 39-55, December.
    11. Jimmy Yicheng Huang, 2021. "Basel III FRTB: data pooling innovation to lower capital charges," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Srivastava, Rajendra P. & Kogan, Alexander, 2010. "Assurance on XBRL instance document: A conceptual framework of assertions," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 261-273.
    13. Nofie Iman, 2020. "The rise and rise of financial technology: The good, the bad, and the verdict," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1725309-172, January.
    14. Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis, 2018. "Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 7-25.
    15. Khan, Muhammad Asif & Pattnaik, Debidutta & Ashraf, Rohail & Ali, Imtiaz & Kumar, Satish & Donthu, Naveen, 2021. "Value of special issues in the journal of business research: A bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 295-313.
    16. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.
    17. Enrique Bonsón & Virginia Cortijo & Tomas Escobar & Francisco Flores & Sergio Monreal, 2010. "Solvency II and XBRL: new rules and technologies in insurance supervision," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 144-157, May.
    18. Johan Bollen & Herbert Van de Sompel & Aric Hagberg & Ryan Chute, 2009. "A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-11, June.
    19. Muhammad Zubair Alam & Nadia Nasir & Ch. Abdul Rehman, 2020. "Intrapreneurship concepts for engineers: a systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations and agenda for future research," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Francesco Paolo Appio & Fabrizio Cesaroni & Alberto Minin, 2014. "Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 623-661, October.
    21. Surya Dashottar & Vikas Srivastava, 2021. "Corporate banking—risk management, regulatory and reporting framework in India: a Blockchain application-based approach," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 39-51, March.
    22. Chao, Xiangrui & Ran, Qin & Chen, Jia & Li, Tie & Qian, Qian & Ergu, Daji, 2022. "Regulatory technology (Reg-Tech) in financial stability supervision: Taxonomy, key methods, applications and future directions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    23. Vladimir I. Soloviev, 2018. "Fintech Ecosystem and Landscape in Russia," Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Lifescience Global, vol. 7, pages 377-390.
    24. Mary M. Crossan & Marina Apaydin, 2010. "A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1154-1191, September.
    25. Dong Yang & Min Li, 2018. "Evolutionary Approaches and the Construction of Technology-Driven Regulations," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(14), pages 3256-3271, November.
    26. O'Riain, Seán & Curry, Edward & Harth, Andreas, 2012. "XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 141-162.
    27. Ridoy Deb Nath & Mohammad Ashraful Ferdous Chowdhury, 2021. "Shadow banking: a bibliometric and content analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, December.
    28. Johan Solms, 2021. "Integrating Regulatory Technology (RegTech) into the digital transformation of a bank Treasury," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 152-168, June.
    29. Weidong Chen & Xiaohui Yuan, 2021. "Financial inclusion in China: an overview," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    30. Williams, James W., 2013. "Regulatory technologies, risky subjects, and financial boundaries: Governing ‘fraud’ in the financial markets," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 544-558.
    31. Dunne, Theresa & Helliar, Christine & Lymer, Andy & Mousa, Rania, 2013. "Stakeholder engagement in internet financial reporting: The diffusion of XBRL in the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 167-182.
    32. Francisco José Acedo & Carmen Barroso & Cristóbal Casanueva & José Luis Galán, 2006. "Co‐Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 957-983, July.
    33. Stefan Zeranski & Ibrahim E. Sancak, 2021. "Prudential supervisory disclosure (PSD) with supervisory technology (SupTech): lessons from a FinTech crisis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(4), pages 315-335, December.
    34. Abdulrahman Alrabiah, 2018. "Optimal regulation of banking system’s advanced credit risk management by unified computational representation of business processes across the entire banking system," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1486685-148, January.
    35. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Pattnaik, Debidutta, 2020. "Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-14.
    36. Tadiwanashe Muganyi & Linnan Yan & Yingkai Yin & Huaping Sun & Xiangbin Gong & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2022. "Fintech, regtech, and financial development: evidence from China," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    37. Songsheng Chen & Jun Guo & Qingqing Liu & Xiaoxiao Tong, 2021. "The impact of XBRL on real earnings management: unexpected consequences of the XBRL implementation in China," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 479-504, February.
    38. Ross P. Buckley & Douglas W. Arner & Dirk A. Zetzsche & Rolf H. Weber, 2020. "The road to RegTech: the (astonishing) example of the European Union," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Federico Boffa & Amedeo Piolatto & Evila Piva & Florian Schuett, 2022. "Industry dynamics in digital markets," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 401-407, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. M. Shamsul Alam & Mohammad Abdul Matin Chowdhury & Dzuljastri Bin Abdul Razak, 2021. "Research evolution in banking performance: a bibliometric analysis," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Michael Becker & Kevin Merz & Rüdiger Buchkremer, 2020. "RegTech—the application of modern information technology in regulatory affairs: areas of interest in research and practice," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 161-167, October.
    3. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    4. Kumar, Satish & Marrone, Mauricio & Liu, Qi & Pandey, Nitesh, 2020. "Twenty years of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems: A bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Satish Kumar & Filomena Maggino & Raj V. Mahto & Riya Sureka & Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Weng Marc Lim, 2022. "Social Indicators Research: A Retrospective Using Bibliometric Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 413-448, July.
    6. Irfan Ullah & Muhammad Safdar & Jianfeng Zheng & Alessandro Severino & Arshad Jamal, 2023. "Employing Bibliometric Analysis to Identify the Current State of the Art and Future Prospects of Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    8. Claudiu Cicea & Carmen Țurlea & Corina Marinescu & Nicolae Pintilie, 2022. "Organizational Culture: A Concept Captive between Determinants and Its Own Power of Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Debmalya Mukherjee & Satish Kumar & Naveen Donthu & Nitesh Pandey, 2021. "Research Published in Management International Review from 2006 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Directions," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 599-642, October.
    10. Jinying Li & Ananda Maiti & Jiangang Fei, 2023. "Features and Scope of Regulatory Technologies: Challenges and Opportunities with Industrial Internet of Things," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-27, July.
    11. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Rui Wang, 2023. "Fintech: from budding to explosion - an overview of the current state of research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 715-755, April.
    12. Sánchez, Marisa A., 2022. "A multi-level perspective on financial technology transitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    13. Ed-Dafali, Slimane & Patel, Ritesh & Iqbal, Najaf, 2023. "A bibliometric review of dividend policy literature," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Manta Eduard Mihai & Davidescu Adriana Ana Maria & Geambasu Maria Cristina & Florescu Margareta Stela, 2023. "Exploring the research area of direct taxation. An empirical analysis based on bibliometric analysis results," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(s1), pages 355-383, December.
    15. Abdelhamid Zaidi & Samuel-Soma M. Ajibade & Majd Musa & Festus Victor Bekun, 2023. "New Insights into the Research Landscape on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Sustainable Smart Cities: A Bibliometric Mapping and Network Analysis Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 287-299, July.
    16. Sidra Salam & Aslan Amat Senin, 2022. "A Bibliometric Study on Innovative Behavior Literature (1961–2019)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    17. Biswas, Pritam & Sinha, Rabindra Kumar & Sen, Phalguni, 2023. "A review of state-of-the-art techniques for the determination of the optimum cut-off grade of a metalliferous deposit with a bibliometric mapping in a surface mine planning context," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Tandon, Anushree & Kaur, Puneet & Mäntymäki, Matti & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Blockchain applications in management: A bibliometric analysis and literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    19. Horvatinović, Tin & Matošec, Marina, 2022. "A decade for the books: Bibliometric analysis of Economics Letters," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    20. Lambert Kofi Osei & Yuliya Cherkasova & Kofi Mintah Oware, 2023. "Unlocking the full potential of digital transformation in banking: a bibliometric review and emerging trend," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:epolin:v:49:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s40812-022-00226-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.