IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v16y2016i2d10.1007_s10660-016-9214-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of online group-buying website and consumers intention to revisit: the moderating effects of visit channels

Author

Listed:
  • Tong Che

    (Soochow University)

  • Zeyu Peng

    (East China University of Science and Technology)

  • Zhongsheng Hua

    (Zhejiang University)

Abstract

Online group-buying (OGB) is a relatively new market, but has attracted much academic attention. Under intensive competition, it is essential for OGB websites to maintain customers’ revisit. This paper identified three context-specific characteristics of an OGB website and investigated the impact of these features on customers’ revisit intention. Furthermore, the effects of these features were proposed to vary among different visit channels. A theoretical model was developed and tested based on 258 valid responses collected through an online survey. The results indicated the distinct effects of OGB features and supported the contingent impact of visit channels. Specifically, timeliness and inconsistency had stronger negative influence on revisit intention for indirect visitors, while the effect of richness is significant for both the direct and indirect visitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Tong Che & Zeyu Peng & Zhongsheng Hua, 2016. "Characteristics of online group-buying website and consumers intention to revisit: the moderating effects of visit channels," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 171-188, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:16:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10660-016-9214-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-016-9214-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-016-9214-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-016-9214-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen J. Perkins & Chris Hendry, 2005. "Ordering Top Pay: Interpreting the Signals," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(7), pages 1443-1468, November.
    2. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    3. Hausman, Angela V. & Siekpe, Jeffrey Sam, 2009. "The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 5-13, January.
    4. Mahyar Sharif Vaghefi & Mahrad Sharif Vaghefi & Neshat Beheshti, 2014. "A pricing model for group-buying auction based on customers' waiting-time," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 425-434, December.
    5. Krishnan S. Anand & Ravi Aron, 2003. "Group Buying on the Web: A Comparison of Price-Discovery Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1546-1562, November.
    6. Xiaoqing Jing & Jinhong Xie, 2011. "Group Buying: A New Mechanism for Selling Through Social Interactions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(8), pages 1354-1372, August.
    7. Aleksandar Pekev{c} & Michael H. Rothkopf, 2003. "Combinatorial Auction Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1485-1503, November.
    8. Jones, Michael A. & Reynolds, Kristy E. & Arnold, Mark J., 2006. "Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 974-981, September.
    9. Wang, Jeff Jianfeng & Zhao, Xin & Li, Julie Juan, 2013. "Group Buying: A Strategic Form of Consumer Collective," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 338-351.
    10. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    11. Williamson, Oliver E., 1987. "Transaction cost economics : The comparative contracting perspective," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 617-625, December.
    12. Srivastava, Joydeep, 2001. "The Role of Inferences in Sequential Bargaining with One-Sided Incomplete Information: Some Experimental Evidence," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 166-187, May.
    13. Oana Branzei & Teri Jane Ursacki‐Bryant & Ilan Vertinsky & Weijiong Zhang, 2004. "The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(11), pages 1075-1095, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi Cui & Jian Mou & Yanping Liu, 2018. "Knowledge mapping of social commerce research: a visual analysis using CiteSpace," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 837-868, December.
    2. Tianhua Zhang & Juliang Zhang & Fu Zhao & Yihong Ru & John W. Sutherland, 2020. "Allocating resources for a restaurant that serves regular and group-buying customers," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 883-913, December.
    3. Yao Tang, 2023. "A product strategy for daily deal campaigns utilizing demand expansion and consumer leakage," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1861-1883, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2013. "Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 21-27.
    2. Jörn Block & Lars Hornuf & Alexandra Moritz, 2018. "Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 3-27, January.
    3. Tianhua Zhang & Juliang Zhang & Fu Zhao & Yihong Ru & John W. Sutherland, 2020. "Allocating resources for a restaurant that serves regular and group-buying customers," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 883-913, December.
    4. Guanqun Ni, 2019. "A pricing model for group buying based on network effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Qijun Qiu & Ying-Ju Chen & Benjamin P.-C. Yen, 2018. "The Implications of Group-Buying as a Channel Option Under Capacity Constraint," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(04), pages 1-32, August.
    6. Tommy Cheung & Wai Hung Wong & Ricky S. Wong & Jia Zhu, 2016. "Does Online Group Buying Benefit or Destroy Retail Businesses?," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Sun, Shuxing & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "Operation strategies for nanostore in community group buying," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    8. Zhang, Guoquan & Shang, Jennifer & Yildirim, Pinar, 2016. "Optimal pricing for group buying with network effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 69-82.
    9. Carolin Baier & Max Göttsche & Andreas Hellmann & Frank Schiemann, 2022. "Too Good To Be True: Influencing Credibility Perceptions with Signaling Reference Explicitness and Assurance Depth," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 695-714, July.
    10. Li, Jianfei & Li, Bei & Shen, Yang & Tang, Kun, 2022. "Study on the steady state of the propagation model of consumers’ perceived service quality in the community group-buying," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Bangwool Han & Minho Kim, 2019. "Hofstede’s Collectivistic Values and Sustainable Growth of Online Group Buying," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Vismara, Silvio, 2019. "Sustainability in equity crowdfunding," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 98-106.
    13. Yang, Byunghwa & Kim, Youngchan & Yoo, Changjo, 2013. "The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1345-1352.
    14. Taj, Saud A., 2016. "Application of signaling theory in management research: Addressing major gaps in theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 338-348.
    15. Longyuan Du & Ming Hu & Jiahua Wu, 2022. "Contingent stimulus in crowdfunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3543-3558, September.
    16. Arthur M. Geoffrion & Ramayya Krishnan, 2003. "E-Business and Management Science: Mutual Impacts (Part 2 of 2)," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1445-1456, November.
    17. Bi, Gongbing & Geng, Botao & Liu, Lindong, 2019. "On the fixed and flexible funding mechanisms in reward-based crowdfunding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 168-183.
    18. Arthur M. Geoffrion & Ramayya Krishnan, 2003. "E-Business and Management Science: Mutual Impacts (Part 1 of 2)," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1275-1286, October.
    19. Fiona Kun Yao & Luqun Xie & Jiatao Li & Mingrui Xu, 2023. "Subnational-level government influence and FDI location choices: The moderating roles of resource dependence relations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(6), pages 1027-1054, August.
    20. Yuecheng Yu & Alexander Pelaez & Karl R. Lang, 2016. "Designing and evaluating business process models: an experimental approach," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 767-789, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:16:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10660-016-9214-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.