IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v170y2022i3d10.1007_s10584-021-03299-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Russian discourses on benefits and threats from international climate diplomacy

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Korppoo

    (Fridtjof Nansen Institute)

Abstract

The Russian climate policy debate pays special interest to the economic and political benefits and threats related to international climate policy. Applying critical discourse analysis, in this study, I dismantle issue discourses into sub-discourses, identifying six central themes, and then discuss the truth-value of the claims made. Policy decisions relevant to climate diplomacy are often in line with sub-discourses of low truth-value. Thus, socially constructed reality can go against statistical data and scientific research, setting the context for policy decisions and international climate cooperation. That makes it difficult to influence Russia’s climate position or domestic policies by sharing knowledge. However, the sub-discourses also indicate a domestic debate on Russia’s climate-diplomacy options—a debate of higher truth-value that may influence constructions of social reality. Thus far, the Russian government has managed to avoid costly domestic emissions-reduction measures. However, the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will impose carbon costs on Russian export products, forcing reconsideration of this social reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Korppoo, 2022. "Russian discourses on benefits and threats from international climate diplomacy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:170:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-021-03299-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-021-03299-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-021-03299-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-021-03299-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Korppoo & Olga Gassan-Zade, 2014. "Lessons from JI and GIS for post-2012 carbon finance mechanisms in Russia and Ukraine," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 224-241, March.
    2. Veli-Pekka Tynkkynen & Nina Tynkkynen, 2018. "Climate Denial Revisited: (Re)contextualising Russian Public Discourse on Climate Change during Putin 2.0," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(7), pages 1103-1120, August.
    3. Anna Korppoo, 2020. "Domestic frames on Russia’s role in international climate diplomacy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 109-123, January.
    4. Jarrod Hayes & Janelle Knox-Hayes, 2014. "Security in Climate Change Discourse: Analyzing the Divergence between US and EU Approaches to Policy," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 14(2), pages 82-101, May.
    5. Anna Korppoo & Alexey Kokorin, 2017. "Russia's 2020 GHG emissions target: Emission trends and implementation," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 113-130, February.
    6. Frank Jotzo & Joanna Depledge & Harald Winkler, 2018. "US and international climate policy under President Trump," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 813-817, August.
    7. George Safonov & Vladimir Potashnikov & Oleg Lugovoy & Mikhail Safonov & Alexandra Dorina & Andrei Bolotov, 2020. "The low carbon development options for Russia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1929-1945, October.
    8. Elana Wilson Rowe, 2009. "Who is to Blame? Agency, Causality, Responsibility and the Role of Experts in Russian Framings of Global Climate Change," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(4), pages 593-619.
    9. Laura A. Henry & Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom, 2007. "Russia and the Kyoto Protocol: Seeking an Alignment of Interests and Image," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 7(4), pages 47-69, November.
    10. Johannes Angermuller, 2018. "Truth after post-truth: for a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katja Doose & Marianna Poberezhskaya & Benjamin Beuerle, 2023. "Introduction from the editors," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(5), pages 1-6, May.
    2. Nadezhda Filimonova & Anastassia Obydenkova & Vinicius G. Rodrigues Vieira, 2023. "Geopolitical and economic interests in environmental governance: explaining observer state status in the Arctic Council," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(5), pages 1-25, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Beuerle, 2023. "From continuity to change: Soviet and Russian government attitudes on climate change (1989–2009)," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Golub, Alexander (Голуб, Александр), 2018. "Methodological Issues of Assessing Investment Risks in Projects Weakening the Dependence of the Russian Economy on Natural Resources and Providing a Transition to Low-Carbon Development [Методологи," Working Papers 071802, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    3. Stavros Afionis & Ioannis Chatzopoulos, 2010. "Russia’s role in UNFCCC negotiations since the exit of the United States in 2001," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 45-63, March.
    4. Wadim Strielkowski & Anna Sherstobitova & Patrik Rovny & Tatiana Evteeva, 2021. "Increasing Energy Efficiency and Modernization of Energy Systems in Russia: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Benjamin P. Warner & Daniel L. Childers & Christopher Kuzdas & Gabriela Stocks, 2018. "Smallholder Adaptation to Drought in Costa Rica's Crony Capitalist Rice Economy," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(6), pages 1392-1421, November.
    6. Teresa Ashe & Marianna Poberezhskaya, 2022. "Russian climate scepticism: an understudied case," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Stranadko, Nataliya, 2021. "EU-US climate cooperation: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the Paris agreement," Discussion Papers 02/2021, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    8. Jari Lyytimäki, 2011. "Mainstreaming climate policy: the role of media coverage in Finland," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 649-661, August.
    9. Guliyev, Farid, 2020. "Trump’s “America first” energy policy, contingency and the reconfiguration of the global energy order," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    10. Wang, Jie & Xiong, Yiling & Tian, Xin & Liu, Shangwei & Li, Jiashuo & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2018. "Stagnating CO2 emissions with in-depth socioeconomic transition in Beijing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1714-1725.
    11. Christopher Marcoux & Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "Capacity, not constraints: A theory of North-South regulatory cooperation," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 399-424, December.
    12. Sheng Hu & Pan Zhang & Taoyuan Wei, 2022. "Financial Measures to Reduce Carbon Emissions in Britain, Japan and the United States: A SWOT Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Licandeo, Francisca & Flores, Francisco & Feijoo, Felipe, 2023. "Assessing the impacts of economy-wide emissions policies in the water, energy, and land systems considering water scarcity scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    14. Adil Absattar & Manshuk Mambetova & Orynay Zhubay, 2022. "The potential of emotive language to influence the understanding of textual information in media coverage," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    15. Khara D. Grieger & Tyler Felgenhauer & Ortwin Renn & Jonathan Wiener & Mark Borsuk, 2019. "Emerging risk governance for stratospheric aerosol injection as a climate management technology," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 371-382, December.
    16. Mark Purdon, 2015. "Advancing Comparative Climate Change Politics: Theory and Method," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, August.
    17. Leonardo Nascimento & Takeshi Kuramochi & Niklas Höhne, 2022. "The G20 emission projections to 2030 improved since the Paris Agreement, but only slightly," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1-24, August.
    18. Andreas Goldthau & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2016. "Energy Technology, Politics, and Interpretative Frames: Shale Gas Fracking in Eastern Europe," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(4), pages 50-69, November.
    19. Yuhao Ba & Kathryn Schwaeble & Thomas Birkland, 2022. "The United States in Chinese environmental policy narratives: Is there a trump effect?," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(6), pages 708-729, November.
    20. Rajesh Sahu & Pramod Kumar, 2023. "The Missing Nexus: A Historical and Contemporary Position of the United States on Climate Change Action," International Studies, , vol. 60(4), pages 444-479, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:170:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-021-03299-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.