IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v29y2021i2d10.1007_s10100-020-00685-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Volume allocation in multi-sourcing: effects of the quantity–quality trade-off

Author

Listed:
  • Kristian Strmenik

    (University of Klagenfurt)

  • Friederike Wall

    (University of Klagenfurt)

  • Christian Mitsch

    (University of Klagenfurt)

  • Gernot Mödritscher

    (University of Klagenfurt)

Abstract

The network of suppliers and, in particular, the allocation of a buyer’s procurement volumes is one of the key issues in supply chain management when following a multiple-sourcing strategy. This paper proposes a buyer–supplier model which considers a supplier quantity–quality trade-off reflecting the responsiveness of quality to changes in volume. The trade-off is based on the assumption that suppliers are not able to maintain the same level of quality, if quantity increases and vice versa. In order to model the relation between quantity and quality, a generalized logistic function is used. Considering heterogeneous suppliers in terms of the quantity–quality trade-off, we analyze, how different procurement volumes for a product affect the supplier structure of a buyer in a multiple-sourcing buyer–supplier network. An agent-based simulation is applied which is an appropriate approach to study systems of heterogeneous and interacting agents (e.g., buyer and suppliers, interactions between suppliers, mutual effects of parameters). The results show that in such a network not only the procurement volume remarkably shapes the supplier structure and, eventually, may lead to instability. Moreover, the results suggest that less advanced quality management systems on the buyer’s side may increase the stability of the supplier structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristian Strmenik & Friederike Wall & Christian Mitsch & Gernot Mödritscher, 2021. "Volume allocation in multi-sourcing: effects of the quantity–quality trade-off," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(2), pages 753-771, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:29:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10100-020-00685-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-020-00685-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10100-020-00685-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-020-00685-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bryan C McCannon, 2008. "The Quality–Quantity Trade-off," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 95-100, Winter.
    2. Friederike Wall, 2016. "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 135-193, January.
    3. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    4. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 1997. "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 546-558, April.
    5. Olmos, Marta Fernandez & Martinez, Jorge Rosell, 2011. "The Quality-Quantity Trade-off in the Principal-Agent Framework," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Marco Li Calzi & Lucia Milone & Paolo Pellizzari (ed.), 2010. "Progress in Artificial Economics," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-642-13947-5, December.
    7. Friederike Wall, 2010. "The (Beneficial) Role of Informational Imperfections in Enhancing Organisational Performance," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Marco Li Calzi & Lucia Milone & Paolo Pellizzari (ed.), Progress in Artificial Economics, pages 115-126, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Friederike Wall, 2017. "Learning To Incentivize In Different Modes Of Coordination," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02n03), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Friederike Wall, 2021. "Modeling Managerial Search Behavior based on Simon's Concept of Satisficing," Papers 2104.14002, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    3. Volodymyr Babich, 2010. "Independence of Capacity Ordering and Financial Subsidies to Risky Suppliers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 583-607, September.
    4. Leitner, Stephan & Rausch, Alexandra & Behrens, Doris A., 2017. "Distributed investment decisions and forecasting errors: An analysis based on a multi-agent simulation model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 279-294.
    5. Gérard P. Cachon & Karan Girotra & Serguei Netessine, 2020. "Interesting, Important, and Impactful Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 214-222, January.
    6. Schmitt, Thomas G. & Kumar, Sanjay & Stecke, Kathryn E. & Glover, Fred W. & Ehlen, Mark A., 2017. "Mitigating disruptions in a multi-echelon supply chain using adaptive ordering," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 185-198.
    7. Friederike Wall, 2023. "Modeling managerial search behavior based on Simon’s concept of satisficing," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 265-299, June.
    8. Stephen C. Graves & Brian T. Tomlin & Sean P. Willems, 2022. "Supply chain challenges in the post–Covid Era," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4319-4332, December.
    9. Rana Azghandi & Jacqueline Griffin & Mohammad S. Jalali, 2018. "Minimization of Drug Shortages in Pharmaceutical Supply Chains: A Simulation-Based Analysis of Drug Recall Patterns and Inventory Policies," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-14, December.
    10. Ying Rong & Lawrence V. Snyder & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2017. "Bullwhip and reverse bullwhip effects under the rationing game," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 203-216, April.
    11. Zhao, Lima & Huchzermeier, Arnd, 2015. "Operations–finance interface models: A literature review and framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 905-917.
    12. Kogan, Konstantin & Herbon, Avi, 2022. "Retailing under panic buying and consumer stockpiling: Can governmental intervention make a difference?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    13. Schmidt, Christoph G. & Wuttke, David A. & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wagner, Stephan M., 2023. "Antecedents of public reactions to supply chain glitches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    14. Ewerhart, Christian & Cassola, Nuno & Valla, Natacha, 2012. "Overbidding in fixed rate tenders: The role of exposure risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 539-549.
    15. Jie Wu & Zhixin Chen & Xiang Ji, 2020. "Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 115-143, July.
    16. Xiang Li, 2017. "Optimal procurement strategies from suppliers with random yield and all-or-nothing risks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 167-181, October.
    17. Baron, Opher & Callen, Jeffrey L. & Segal, Dan, 2023. "Does the bullwhip matter economically? A cross-sectional firm-level analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    18. Elcio Mendonça Tachizawa & Cristina Giménez, 2005. "Drivers and sources of supply flexibility: An exploratory study," Economics Working Papers 889, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    19. Ho-Yin Mak & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2014. "Pooling and Dependence of Demand and Yield in Multiple-Location Inventory Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 263-269, May.
    20. Tang, Liang & Jing, Ke & He, Jie & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2016. "Robustness of assembly supply chain networks by considering risk propagation and cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 459(C), pages 129-139.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:29:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10100-020-00685-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.