IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aqjoor/v18y2020i1d10.1007_s10288-019-00409-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-making of fresh agricultural product supply chain considering the manufacturer’s fairness concerns

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Yan

    (South China University of Technology)

  • Jiwen Wu

    (South China University of Technology)

  • Zijie Jin

    (South China University of Technology)

  • Shiyou He

    (South China University of Technology)

Abstract

By considering the characteristics of fresh agricultural products, this article introduces the behavioral tendency of fairness concerns of manufacturer to examine the fresh agricultural product supply chain and the optimal decision-making problem. The effects of the manufacturer’s behavioral tendency of fairness concerns on the fresh agricultural product supply chain is analyzed within the traditional and Nash bargaining frameworks, respectively. Results indicate that the manufacturer’s behavioral tendencies can reduce the freshness-keeping effort, the freshness of the produce, and the market demand of fresh agricultural products. The optimal wholesale price and retail price also increase or decrease to meet the manufacturer’s fairness concerns. These are determined by the price elasticity and the level of fairness concern, along with the fairness concern condition. Whether within the traditional or Nash bargaining fairness concern framework, market demand declines significantly with the increase in the level of fairness concern, thereby leading to the reduction of the utility of retailer in the supply chain. Therefore, the revenue sharing contract is introduced to achieve the Pareto improvement of both the manufacturer and the retailer.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Yan & Jiwen Wu & Zijie Jin & Shiyou He, 2020. "Decision-making of fresh agricultural product supply chain considering the manufacturer’s fairness concerns," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 91-122, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aqjoor:v:18:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10288-019-00409-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10288-019-00409-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10288-019-00409-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10288-019-00409-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sudhölter, Peter & Zarzuelo, José M., 2013. "Extending the Nash solution to choice problems with reference points," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 219-228.
    2. Sana, Shib Sankar, 2013. "Optimal contract strategies for two stage supply chain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 253-260.
    3. Mai, Feng & Fry, Michael J. & Raturi, Amitabh S., 2016. "Supply-chain performance anomalies: Fairness concerns under private cost informationAuthor-Name: Qin, Fei," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 170-182.
    4. Dye, Chung-Yuan & Hsieh, Tsu-Pang, 2012. "An optimal replenishment policy for deteriorating items with effective investment in preservation technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 106-112.
    5. Aysoy, Cevriye & Kirli, Duygu Halim & Tumen, Semih, 2015. "How does a shorter supply chain affect pricing of fresh food? Evidence from a natural experiment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 104-113.
    6. Yang, Jing & Xie, Jinxing & Deng, Xiaoxue & Xiong, Huachun, 2013. "Cooperative advertising in a distribution channel with fairness concerns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 401-407.
    7. Wang, Xiaojun & Li, Dong, 2012. "A dynamic product quality evaluation based pricing model for perishable food supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 906-917.
    8. Yu Xiong & Gendao Li & Kiran Jude Fernandes, 2010. "Dynamic pricing model and algorithm for perishable products with fuzzy demand," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 758-774, November.
    9. Caliskan-Demirag, Ozgun & Chen, Youhua (Frank) & Li, Jianbin, 2010. "Channel coordination under fairness concerns and nonlinear demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1321-1326, December.
    10. Nie, Tengfei & Du, Shaofu, 2017. "Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 491-500.
    11. Christoph H. Loch & Yaozhong Wu, 2008. "Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance: An Experimental Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(11), pages 1835-1849, November.
    12. Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo & Sana, Shib Sankar, 2014. "A production-inventory model for a two-echelon supply chain when demand is dependent on sales teams׳ initiatives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 249-258.
    13. Uri Gneezy, 2005. "Updating the Reference Level: Experimental Evidence," Springer Books, in: Rami Zwick & Amnon Rapoport (ed.), Experimental Business Research, chapter 0, pages 263-284, Springer.
    14. Shib Sankar Sana, 2016. "Optimal production lot size and reorder point of a two-stage supply chain while random demand is sensitive with sales teams' initiatives," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 450-465, January.
    15. Hsu, P.H. & Wee, H.M. & Teng, H.M., 2010. "Preservation technology investment for deteriorating inventory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 388-394, April.
    16. Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Su, Wei-Jun & Lin, Zu-Liang, 2011. "A study on lead-time discount coordination for deteriorating products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 358-366, December.
    17. Rong, Aiying & Akkerman, Renzo & Grunow, Martin, 2011. "An optimization approach for managing fresh food quality throughout the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 421-429, May.
    18. Tony Haitao Cui & Jagmohan S. Raju & Z. John Zhang, 2007. "Fairness and Channel Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1303-1314, August.
    19. M M Lotfi & M Rabbani & S F Ghaderi, 2011. "A weighted goal programming approach for replenishment planning and space allocation in a supermarket," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(6), pages 1128-1137, June.
    20. Jianxin Chen & Yong-Wu Zhou & Yuanguang Zhong, 2017. "A pricing/ordering model for a dyadic supply chain with buyback guarantee financing and fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(18), pages 5287-5304, September.
    21. Peng Ma & Kevin W. Li & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2017. "Pricing decisions in closed-loop supply chains with marketing effort and fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6710-6731, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaoguang Zhong & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Fangfang Guo & Huajun Tang, 2021. "Research on Government Subsidy Strategies for the Development of Agricultural Products E-Commerce," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Qing Yang & Lei Xiong & Yanfeng Li & Qian Chen & Yijing Yu & Jingyang Wang, 2022. "Contract Coordination of Fresh Agri-Product Supply Chain under O2O Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Jiali Wang & Yujia Huo & Xiangyu Guo & Yang Xu, 2022. "The Pricing Strategy of the Agricultural Product Supply Chain with Farmer Cooperatives as the Core Enterprise," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Jinwu Gao & Zhuolin Cui & Huijie Li & Ruru Jia, 2023. "Optimization and Coordination of the Fresh Agricultural Product Supply Chain Considering the Freshness-Keeping Effort and Information Sharing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Genhasi Ge & Daoping Wang & Mesumbe Bianca Epede, 2022. "Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers’ Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Fang Qiu & Qifan Hu & Bing Xu, 2020. "Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain Coordination and Volume Loss Reduction Based on Strategic Consumer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-25, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zhong-Ping & Wang, Jian-Jun & Perera, Sandun & Shi, Jim (Junmin), 2022. "Coordination of a supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Đula, Ivan & Größler, Andreas, 2021. "Inequity aversion in dynamically complex supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 309-322.
    3. Yadong Shu & Ying Dai & Zujun Ma, 2019. "Pricing Decisions in Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Peer-Induced Fairness Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Li, Deng-Feng & Liu, Zhi & Jia, Fu & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Coordinating a closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns through variable-weighted Shapley values," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 227-253.
    5. Sarkar, Sumit, 2019. "Gratitude, conscience, and reciprocity: Models of supplier motivation when quality is non-contractible," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 633-642.
    6. Ilkyeong Moon & Yoon Jea Jeong & Subrata Saha, 2020. "Investment and coordination decisions in a supply chain of fresh agricultural products," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2307-2331, December.
    7. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Huang, Jun & Chen, Ji, 2019. "Cooperative game approaches to coordinating a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 92-110.
    8. Wei Guangxing & Yao Yanling & Qin Yanhong, 2019. "Optimal Decision-Making of Low-Carbon Supply Chain Incorporating Fairness Concerns," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 283-294, June.
    9. Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Liang Shen & Yan Ge & Jing Li, 2018. "Different Dominant Models and Fairness Concern of E-Supply Chain," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, December.
    10. Zhang, Ranran & Ma, Weimin & Si, Hongyun & Liu, Jinjin & Liao, Le, 2021. "Cooperative game analysis of coordination mechanisms under fairness concerns of a green retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    11. Sarkar, Sumit & Bhala, Shrey, 2021. "Coordinating a closed loop supply chain with fairness concern by a constant wholesale price contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 140-156.
    12. Wang, Yuyan & Yu, Zhaoqing & Jin, Mingzhou & Mao, Jiafu, 2021. "Decisions and coordination of retailer-led low-carbon supply chain under altruistic preference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 910-925.
    13. Bisheng Du & Qing Liu & Guiping Li, 2017. "Coordinating Leader-Follower Supply Chain with Sustainable Green Technology Innovation on Their Fairness Concerns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Ni Du & Qinglan Han, 2018. "Pricing and Service Quality Guarantee Decisions in Logistics Service Supply Chain with Fairness Concern," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(05), pages 1-41, October.
    15. Zongsheng Huang, 2020. "Stochastic Differential Game in the Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Guowei Liu & Jianxiong Zhang & Wansheng Tang, 2015. "Joint dynamic pricing and investment strategy for perishable foods with price-quality dependent demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 397-416, March.
    17. Yu, Niu & Wang, Shumei & Liu, Zhixin, 2022. "Managing brand competition with consumer fairness concern via manufacturer incentive," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 661-675.
    18. Qingfeng Meng & Zhen Li & Jianguo Du & Huimin Liu & Xiang Ding, 2019. "Negotiation for Time Optimization in Construction Projects with Competitive and Social Welfare Preferences," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, January.
    19. Du, Shaofu & Nie, Tengfei & Chu, Chengbin & Yu, Yugang, 2014. "Reciprocal supply chain with intention," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 389-402.
    20. Liang Shen & Fei Lin & Yuyan Wang & Xin Su & Hua Li & Rui Zhou, 2022. "Advertising Decisions of Platform Supply Chains Considering Network Externalities and Fairness Concerns," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aqjoor:v:18:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10288-019-00409-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.