IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/anresc/v70y2023i1d10.1007_s00168-021-01098-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Piped water supply and usage and the question of services of general interest: a spatial panel data analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela-Luminita Constantin

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Zizi Goschin

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies
    Institute of National Economy)

  • Cristina Serbanica

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies
    Constantin Brancoveanu University of Pitesti)

Abstract

The services of general interest (SGI) hold an important place in relation to the European model of society, referring to general functions and objectives that are essential for the implementation of fundamental citizen rights and for the accomplishment of economic, social and territorial cohesion goals. SGI reflect the obligation of public authorities to provide them at certain standards in terms of quality, availability, accessibility and affordability. Besides the socio-economic dimension involved in these discussions, which envisages the provision of SGI to everyone, the territorial dimension has to be considered too, as it emphasises the provision of SGI everywhere. In this paper, the inquiry into the piped water consumption differentiates between households and firms. We explored the territorial dimension of this topic by means of various spatial panel models, which account for the spatial effects emerging via cooperation, imitation or cross-country spillovers in neighbour regions. Given the characteristics of the geographic, social and economic factors envisaged in our research, we hypothesised significant spatial influences among counties; therefore, the spatial panel is the appropriate way to avoid misspecification problems related to the estimation and interpretation of the standard (non-spatial) panel data model. It is applied in the specific case of Romania that is highly relevant in terms of availability and accessibility criteria, considering the amplitude of territorial disparities not only between regions but also between urban and rural environments, in a country with more than 43% of its population living in rural areas, still lagging behind when it comes to the basic infrastructure necessary for a decent standard of living.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela-Luminita Constantin & Zizi Goschin & Cristina Serbanica, 2023. "Piped water supply and usage and the question of services of general interest: a spatial panel data analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(1), pages 187-207, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:70:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s00168-021-01098-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00168-021-01098-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00168-021-01098-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00168-021-01098-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Céline Nauges & Caroline Berg, 2008. "Economies of density, scale and scope in the water supply and sewerage sector: a study of four developing and transition economies," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 144-163, October.
    2. Max Spoor & Luca Tasciotti & Mihail Peleah, 2014. "Quality of life and social exclusion in rural Southern, Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 201-219, June.
    3. Daniela-Luminita Constantin & Tudorel Andrei & Raluca Mariana Grosu & Bogdan-Vasile Ileanu, 2019. "Services Of General Interest In Rural And Intermediate Regions.The Case Of Internet Services In The North-East Region Of Romania," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 13(1), pages 35-56, JUNE.
    4. Djankov, Simeon & Hoekman, Bernard M, 2000. "Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 14(1), pages 49-64, January.
    5. Jasper Dalhuisen & Peter Nijkamp, 2002. "Enhancing Efficiency of Water Provision," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-071/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Edward L. Glaeser, 2012. "Urban Public Finance," NBER Working Papers 18244, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Baccini, Leonardo & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2014. "International institutions and domestic politics: can preferential trading agreements help leaders promote economic reform?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 55608, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Baltagi, Badi H. & Song, Seuck Heun & Koh, Won, 2003. "Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 123-150, November.
    9. Thorsten Beck & Asli Demirguc-Kunt & Ross Levine, 2005. "SMEs, Growth, and Poverty: Cross-Country Evidence," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 199-229, September.
    10. Daniel R. Rondinel-Oviedo & Jaime M. Sarmiento-Pastor, 2020. "Water: consumption, usage patterns, and residential infrastructure. A comparative analysis of three regions in the Lima metropolitan area," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7-8), pages 824-846, November.
    11. Daniela- Luminita CONSTANTIN, 2021. "Addressing Spatial Justice At Lower Territorial Levels. Some Insights From The Central And East European Countries' Perspective," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 315-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena DRUICĂ & Zizi GOSCHIN & Ana-Maria GRIGORE, 2017. "Regional interplay of factors informing SMES’ density in Romania. A panel data analysis," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8, pages 79-95, June.
    2. Zizi Goschin, 2020. "What makes new firms resilient? A spatial analysis for Romania," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 913-930, October.
    3. repec:rri:wpaper:201303 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Eleftheria Kontou & Noreen McDonald, 2021. "Associating ridesourcing with road safety outcomes: Insights from Austin, Texas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Greenaway, David & Görg, Holger, 2002. "Much Ado About Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Investment?," CEPR Discussion Papers 3485, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Kanta Marwah & Akbar Tavakoli, 2004. "The Effect of Foreign Capital and Imports on Economic Growth: Further Evidence from Four Asian Countries," Carleton Economic Papers 04-02, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    7. Oznur Ozdamar & Eleftherios Giovanis & Sahizer Samuk, 2020. "State business relations and the dynamics of job flows in Egypt and Turkey," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(4), pages 519-558, December.
    8. Knack, Steve & Xu, Lixin Colin, 2017. "Unbundling institutions for external finance: Worldwide firm-level evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 215-232.
    9. Askarov, Zohid & Doucouliagos, Hristos, 2015. "Spatial aid spillovers during transition," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 40(PA), pages 79-95.
    10. Hu, Helen Wei & Cui, Lin, 2014. "Outward foreign direct investment of publicly listed firms from China: A corporate governance perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 750-760.
    11. Victoria Kravtsova, 2008. "Foreign presence and efficiency in transition economies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 91-102, April.
    12. Simonetta Longhi & Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot, 2006. "Spatial Heterogeneity And The Wage Curve Revisited," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 707-731, October.
    13. Badi H. Baltagi & Peter Egger & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2007. "A Monte Carlo Study for Pure and Pretest Estimators of a Panel Data Model with Spatially Autocorrelated Disturbances," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 87-88, pages 11-38.
    14. Michele Aquaro & Natalia Bailey & M. Hashem Pesaran, 2015. "Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Spatial Models with Heterogeneous Coefficients," CESifo Working Paper Series 5428, CESifo.
    15. Lee, Yoonseok & Mukherjee, Debasri & Ullah, Aman, 2019. "Nonparametric estimation of the marginal effect in fixed-effect panel data models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 53-67.
    16. Baltagi, Badi H. & Liu, Long, 2008. "Testing for random effects and spatial lag dependence in panel data models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(18), pages 3304-3306, December.
    17. Ichiro IWASAKI & Satoshi MIZOBATA, 2018. "Post-Privatization Ownership And Firm Performance: A Large Meta-Analysis Of The Transition Literature," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(2), pages 263-322, June.
    18. Rhys Andrews & Malcolm J. Beynon, 2019. "Configurational Analysis of Access to Basic Infrastructure Services: Evidence from Turkish Provinces," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(5), pages 1341-1370, December.
    19. Javier Alejo & Antonio Galvao & Gabriel Montes-Rojas & Walter Sosa-Escudero, 2015. "Tests for normality in linear panel-data models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 15(3), pages 822-832, September.
    20. Genthner, Robert & Kis-Katos, Krisztina, 2022. "Foreign investment regulation and firm productivity: Granular evidence from Indonesia," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 668-687.
    21. Matthias Arnold, Jens & Javorcik, Beata S., 2009. "Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign direct investment and plant productivity in Indonesia," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 42-53, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L95 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Gas Utilities; Pipelines; Water Utilities
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:70:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s00168-021-01098-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.