IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v224y2015i1p171-19210.1007-s10479-012-1182-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical multiple criteria optimization of maintenance activities on power distribution networks

Author

Listed:
  • Fábio Usberti
  • Christiano Lyra
  • Celso Cavellucci
  • José González

Abstract

Power distribution utilities must transport quality and reliable electric energy to all of the customers in a given network within specified targets. Failure of one of the network components is the main factor that compromises a system’s reliability. Maintenance actions, such as repairs and component replacements, are employed to avoid power interruptions or to resume the healthy network operation. This paper reports the relationship between maintenance activities and reliability as an optimization problem with two criteria: cost of maintenance activities and the maximum value for a system average interruption frequency index planning period. Solving these problems for each network provides local efficient solutions and associated trade-off curves. These solutions are optimally combined to solve a global-level multiple criteria optimization problem, revealing the local efficient solutions and associated trade-off curves for a group of networks or for a whole company. The procedure solves the hierarchical multiple criteria maintenance resources allocation problem and provides information to assess the decisions on maintenance activities at all decision levels in the network management. This procedure is applied to one illustrative example and real-life case studies to demonstrate its benefits. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Fábio Usberti & Christiano Lyra & Celso Cavellucci & José González, 2015. "Hierarchical multiple criteria optimization of maintenance activities on power distribution networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 224(1), pages 171-192, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:224:y:2015:i:1:p:171-192:10.1007/s10479-012-1182-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1182-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-012-1182-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-012-1182-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roy, Bernard & Vincke, Philippe, 1981. "Multicriteria analysis: survey and new directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 207-218, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohd Ikhwan Muhammad Ridzuan & Sasa Z. Djokic, 2019. "Energy Regulator Supply Restoration Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Jing Li & Guodong Wang & Haofei Zhou & Honggen Chen, 2023. "Redundancy allocation optimization for multi-state system with hierarchical performance requirements," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(6), pages 1031-1047, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hae-Yeol Kang & Seung Taek Chae & Eun-Sung Chung, 2023. "Quantifying Medium-Sized City Flood Vulnerability Due to Climate Change Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques: Case of Republic of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Fancello, Giovanna & Tsoukiàs, Alexis, 2021. "Learning urban capabilities from behaviours. A focus on visitors values for urban planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. A.P. Wierzbicki, 1998. "Reference Point Methods in Vector Optimization and Decision Support," Working Papers ir98017, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    4. Govindan, Kannan & Jepsen, Martin Brandt, 2016. "ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 1-29.
    5. Marco Migliore & Salvatore Amoroso & Valeria Cardaci & Mario Catalano, 2011. "The role of passenger modal shift nodes in the interaction between land use and transport system," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1606, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Srinivas, Morapakala, 2011. "Domestic solar hot water systems: Developments, evaluations and essentials for “viability” with a special reference to India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3850-3861.
    7. Vetschera, Rudolf, 1992. "Estimating preference cones from discrete choices: Computational techniques and experiences," Discussion Papers, Series I 259, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    8. Al-Rashdan, Dina & Al-Kloub, Bashar & Dean, Angela & Al-Shemmeri, Tarik, 1999. "Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 30-45, October.
    9. Ascough, J.C. & Maier, H.R. & Ravalico, J.K. & Strudley, M.W., 2008. "Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 383-399.
    10. Haralambopoulos, D.A. & Polatidis, H., 2003. "Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 961-973.
    11. Vikas Swarnakar & Amit Raj Singh & Jiju Antony & Raja Jayaraman & Anil Kr Tiwari & Rajeev Rathi & Elizabeth Cudney, 2022. "Prioritizing Indicators for Sustainability Assessment in Manufacturing Process: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Calders, Toon & Van Assche, Dimitri, 2018. "PROMETHEE is not quadratic: An O(qnlog(n)) algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 63-69.
    13. Jean Kamdjoug & Philippe Lenca & Jean-Pierre Barthélemy, 2007. "Assessment of actions in a multi-actor and multicriteria framework: application to the refunding of microfinance institutions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 213-227, March.
    14. Radivoj Petrović & Aleksandar S̄enborn & Mirko Vujos̄ević, 1988. "Multicriteria ranking of spares allocations," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 707-717, December.
    15. He, Ying & Huang, Rui-Hua, 2008. "Risk attributes theory: Decision making under risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 243-260, April.
    16. Maria Rosaria Sessa & Benedetta Esposito & Daniela Sica & Ornella Malandrino, 2021. "A Logical-Mathematical Approach for the Implementation of Ecologically Equipped Productive Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Ferrari, Paolo, 2003. "A method for choosing from among alternative transportation projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 194-203, October.
    18. Contreras, Francisco & Hanaki, Keisuke & Aramaki, Toshiya & Connors, Stephen, 2008. "Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 979-991.
    19. Safer, Hershel M. & Orlin, James B., 1953-, 1995. "Fast approximation schemes for multi-criteria combinatorial optimization," Working papers 3756-95., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    20. Bárbara de Oliveira Vieira & Patricia Guarnieri & Lucio Camara e Silva & Solange Alfinito, 2020. "Prioritizing Barriers to Be Solved to the Implementation of Reverse Logistics of E-Waste in Brazil under a Multicriteria Decision Aid Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-30, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:224:y:2015:i:1:p:171-192:10.1007/s10479-012-1182-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.