IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v173y2010i1p25-3710.1007-s10479-009-0572-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of supervisory monitoring on high-end retail sales productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Rajiv Banker
  • Seok-Young Lee
  • Gordon Potter
  • Dhinu Srinivasan

Abstract

Based on a two-stage analysis of a panel of data on 12 outlets of a high-end retailer for 24 months, we investigate how the level of supervisory monitoring affects retail sales productivity. In the first stage, we use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to compute the relative productivity of retail outlets in using their labor and capital resources to generate store sales. In the second stage, we regress the logarithm of DEA scores on contextual variables to obtain consistent estimators of the impact of contextual variables on productivity (Banker and Natarajan in Operation Research 56:48–58, 2008 ). Contrary to agency theoretic prediction that supervisory monitoring leads to an increase in retail sales productivity, our empirical results indicate that the higher the level of supervisory monitoring, the lower is the retail sales productivity for high-end retail outlets. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Suggested Citation

  • Rajiv Banker & Seok-Young Lee & Gordon Potter & Dhinu Srinivasan, 2010. "The impact of supervisory monitoring on high-end retail sales productivity," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 25-37, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:173:y:2010:i:1:p:25-37:10.1007/s10479-009-0572-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-009-0572-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-009-0572-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-009-0572-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajiv Banker & Hsihui Chang & Ram Natarajan, 2007. "Estimating DEA technical and allocative inefficiency using aggregate cost or revenue data," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 115-121, April.
    2. Rajiv Lal & V. Srinivasan, 1993. "Compensation Plans for Single- and Multi-Product Salesforces: An Application of the Holmstrom-Milgrom Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(7), pages 777-793, July.
    3. Amiya K. Basu & Rajiv Lal & V. Srinivasan & Richard Staelin, 1985. "Salesforce Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic Perspective," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 267-291.
    4. Rajiv D. Banker & Ram Natarajan, 2008. "Evaluating Contextual Variables Affecting Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 48-58, February.
    5. Doran, H. E. & Griffiths, W. E., 1983. "On the relative efficiency of estimators which include the initial observations in the estimation of seemingly unrelated regressions with first-order autoregressive disturbances," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 165-191, October.
    6. Brian T. Ratchford & James R. Brown, 1985. "A Study of Productivity Changes in Food Retailing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 292-311.
    7. Kissan Joseph & Alex Thevaranjan, 1998. "Monitoring and Incentives in Sales Organizations: An Agency-Theoretic Perspective," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 107-123.
    8. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    9. Churchill, Gilbert Jr. & Ford, Neil M. & Walker, Orville Jr., 1979. "Personal characteristics of salespeople and the attractiveness of alternative rewards," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 25-50.
    10. William G. Ouchi, 1979. "A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(9), pages 833-848, September.
    11. Arie Y. Lewin & John W. Minton, 1986. "Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look, and an Agenda for Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 514-538, May.
    12. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 1985. "Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 134-149, February.
    13. Park, Rolla Edward & Mitchell, Bridger M., 1980. "Estimating the autocorrelated error model with trended data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 185-201, June.
    14. Lambert, Richard A., 2001. "Contracting theory and accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 3-87, December.
    15. Balaji S. Chakravarthy, 1986. "Measuring strategic performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(5), pages 437-458, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hsihui Chang & Hiu Choy & Iny Hwang, 2015. "An empirical study of returns to scale of CPA firms in the post SOX era," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 253-264, June.
    2. Roxani Karagiannis, 2015. "A system-of-equations two-stage DEA approach for explaining capacity utilization and technical efficiency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 227(1), pages 25-43, April.
    3. Liang, Jing & Yang, Shilei & Xia, Yu, 2023. "The role of financial slack on the relationship between demand uncertainty and operational efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Banker, Rajiv D. & Chang, Hsihui & Lee, Seok-Young, 2010. "Differential impact of Korean banking system reforms on bank productivity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1450-1460, July.
    2. David B. Balkin & Jérôme Côté & Michel Tremblay, 1998. "Explaining Sales Pay Strategy Using Agency, Transaction Cost and Resource Dependence Theories," CIRANO Working Papers 98s-28, CIRANO.
    3. Krafft, Manfred, 1997. "An empirical investigation of the antecedents of salesforce control systems," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 454, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    4. Morgan, Neil A. & Clark, Bruce H. & Gooner, Rich, 2002. "Marketing productivity, marketing audits, and systems for marketing performance assessment: integrating multiple perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 363-375, May.
    5. Albers, Sönke & Krafft, Manfred, 1995. "Zur relativen Aussagekraft und Eignung von Ansätzen der neuen Institutionenlehre für die Absatzformwahl sowie die Entlohnung von Verkaufsaußendienstmitarbeitern," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 375, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    6. Xiaoyang Long & Javad Nasiry, 2020. "Wage Transparency and Social Comparison in Sales Force Compensation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 5290-5315, November.
    7. Fabio Caldieraro & Anne T. Coughlan, 2009. "Optimal Sales Force Diversification and Group Incentive Payments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1009-1026, 11-12.
    8. Banker, Rajiv & Chen, Janice Y.S. & Klumpes, Paul, 2016. "A trade-level DEA model to evaluate relative performance of investment fund managers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 903-910.
    9. Christian Hofmann & Yvette E. Hofmann, 2013. "Unternehmenszusammenschluss und Unternehmenskultur — Auswirkungen auf die Gestaltung von Anreizsystemen und Performancemessung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 136-166, March.
    10. Naresh Bansal & Kissan Bansal & Minghui Ma & M. Babajide Wintoki, 2017. "Do CMO Incentives Matter? An Empirical Investigation of CMO Compensation and Its Impact on Firm Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1993-2015, June.
    11. Sumitro Banerjee & Alex P. Thevaranjan, 2019. "Targeting and salesforce compensation: When sales spill over to unprofitable customers," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 81-104, March.
    12. Tat Y. Chan & Jia Li & Lamar Pierce, 2014. "Compensation and Peer Effects in Competing Sales Teams," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(8), pages 1965-1984, August.
    13. Zhu, Joe, 2000. "Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 105-124, May.
    14. Alex Thevaranjan & Kissan Joseph, 1999. "Incentives and job redesign: the case of the personal selling function," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 205-216.
    15. Rupambika Bharati & Biresh K. Sahoo, 2022. "Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of group‐affiliated vis‐à‐vis nonaffiliated firms: A study on Indian manufacturing firms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2759-2774, October.
    16. Evrim D. Günec{s} & O. Zeynep Akc{s}in, 2004. "Value Creation in Service Delivery: Relating Market Segmentation, Incentives, and Operational Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 338-357, May.
    17. Frank H.M. Verbeeten, 2008. "Performance management practices in public sector organizations," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 427-454, March.
    18. John W. Boudreau, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Organizational Behavior, Strategy, Performance, and Design in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1463-1476, November.
    19. Subhash C. Ray, 2022. "Choice of Inputs and Outputs for Production Analysis," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 26, pages 1083-1116, Springer.
    20. Raul O. Chao & Stylianos Kavadias & Cheryl Gaimon, 2009. "Revenue Driven Resource Allocation: Funding Authority, Incentives, and New Product Development Portfolio Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(9), pages 1556-1569, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Efficiency; DEA; Retail sector;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:173:y:2010:i:1:p:25-37:10.1007/s10479-009-0572-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.