IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2017i5p6-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Реакция денежно-кредитной и бюджетно-налоговой политики России на вызовы глобализации // The Reaction of Monetary-Credit and Budget-Taxation Policy of Russia on the Challenges of Globalization

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Golovnin Yu.

    (Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • Lyudmila Lykova N.

    (Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • Irina Bukina S.

    (Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • Михаил Головнин Юрьевич

    (Институт экономики Российской академии наук)

  • Людмила Лыкова Никитична

    (Институт экономики Российской академии наук)

  • Ирина Букина Сергеевна

    (Институт экономики Российской академии наук)

Abstract

Topic. The subject of conducted research is the reaction of monetary-credit and budget-taxation policy of Russia on the challenges facing the Russian economy under the influence of processes of globalization. The main challenges are highlighted by the global economic and financial crisis of 2008–2009 and the crisis 2014–2016, in the development of which series of external shocks have played an important role.Purpose. The purpose of the study is to assess the responsiveness of economic policy to external shocks.Methodology. From the standpoint of macroeconomic theory in an open economy based on the analysis of statistical data were revealed the results of the response of monetary-credit and budget-taxation policy to the external shocks of 2008–2009, and 2014–2016.Results. The normative part of the study contains proposals how to improve economic policy in the face of external shocks. There were highlighted the general vectors of response of monetary-credit policy to the both crises: support of the rouble exchange rate, assistance to the banking system, expanding the toolkit of monetary and credit policy.However, one of the specific features of the crisis 2014–2016 was the transition to a floating exchange rate of the rouble and resulting instability in the currency sphere. The area of budget-taxation policy was marked by the delayed reaction to crises and less stimulating effect during the upheavals 2014–2016. Despite the relatively small size of sovereign debt there exists a trend of rising costs of its service.Conclusions. As conclusions it is proposed a set of measures of monetary-credit and budget-taxation policies aimed at increasing the effectiveness of their response to the challenges of globalization. An important role ought to play the creation of a system of development institutions, aimed at restructuring the economy by using monetary, credit, budget and taxation policy measures. Предмет. Предметом исследования является реакция денежно-кредитной и бюджетно-налоговой политики России на вызовы, с которыми сталкивается российская экономика под воздействием процессов глобализации. В качестве основных вызовов выделены глобальный экономический и финансовый кризис 2008–2009 гг. и кризис 2014–2016 гг., в распространении которого важную роль сыграла серия внешних шоков.Цель. Целью исследования выступает оценка эффективности реагирования экономической политики на внешние шоки.Методология. С позиций макроэкономической теории в условиях открытой экономики на основе анализа статистических данных выявлены результаты мер реагирования денежно-кредитной и бюджетно-налоговой политики на внешние шоки 2008–2009 и 2014–2016 гг.Результаты. Нормативная часть исследования содержит предложения по совершенствованию экономической политики в условиях внешних шоков. Были выделены общие направления реакции денежно-кредитной политики на оба кризиса: поддержка валютного курса рубля, оказание помощи банковской системе, расширение инструментария денежно-кредитной политики. Вместе с тем, особенностью кризиса 2014–2016 гг. был переход к свободно плавающему валютному курсу рубля и усиление нестабильности в валютной сфере. В области бюджетно-налоговой политики отмечено запаздывание ее реакции на кризисы, а также меньший стимулирующий эффект во время потрясений 2014–2016 гг. Несмотря на относительно небольшие размеры государственного долга в России показана тенденция роста издержек его обслуживания.Выводы. В выводной части предлагается комплекс мероприятий денежно-кредитной и бюджетно-налоговой политики, направленный на повышение эффективности их реагирования на вызовы глобализации. Важная роль отводится выстраиванию системы институтов развития, нацеленных на структурную перестройку экономики, с использованием мер денежно-кредитной и бюджетно-налоговой политики.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Golovnin Yu. & Lyudmila Lykova N. & Irina Bukina S. & Михаил Головнин Юрьевич & Людмила Лыкова Никитична & Ирина Букина Сергеевна, 2017. "Реакция денежно-кредитной и бюджетно-налоговой политики России на вызовы глобализации // The Reaction of Monetary-Credit and Budget-Taxation Policy of Russia on the Challenges of Globalization," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 21(5), pages 6-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2017:i:5:p:6-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/567/434.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles P. Kindleberger & Robert Z. Aliber, 2005. "Manias, Panics and Crashes," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 0, number 978-0-230-62804-5, September.
    2. S. Aleksashenko & V. Mironov & D. Miroshnichenko., 2011. "Crisis and Anti-crisis Package in Russia: Targets, Scale, Efficiency," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 2.
    3. Nekipelov, A., 2015. "On the Resource Curse and its Effect on Tactics and Strategy of Economic Development," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 205-210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter C.B. Phillips & Shu-Ping Shi & Jun Yu, 2011. "Testing for Multiple Bubbles," Working Papers 09-2011, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    2. Anthony J. Evans, 2016. "The unintended consequences of easy money: How access to finance impedes entrepreneurship," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 233-252, September.
    3. Paulo M.M. Rodrigues & Rita Fradique Lourenço, 2015. "House prices: bubbles, exuberance or something else? Evidence from euro area countries," Working Papers w201517, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    4. Hertrich Markus, 2019. "A Novel Housing Price Misalignment Indicator for Germany," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(4), pages 759-794, December.
    5. Roy, Saktinil & Kemme, David M., 2012. "Causes of banking crises: Deregulation, credit booms and asset bubbles, then and now," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 270-294.
    6. Raghuram Rajan & Rodney Ramcharan, 2015. "The Anatomy of a Credit Crisis: The Boom and Bust in Farm Land Prices in the United States in the 1920s," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1439-1477, April.
    7. Engelbert Stockhammer & Paul Ramskogler, 2009. "Post-Keynesian economics How to move forward," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 227-246.
    8. Christensen, Bent Jesper & Nielsen, Morten Ørregaard & Zhu, Jie, 2015. "The impact of financial crises on the risk–return tradeoff and the leverage effect," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 407-418.
    9. Farla, Kristine, 2012. "Institutions and credit," MERIT Working Papers 2012-038, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. Schwäbe, Carsten, 2013. "Unkonventionelle Geldpolitik: Warum die Europäische Zentralbank ihre Unabhängigkeit nicht verloren hat," CIW Discussion Papers 3/2013, University of Münster, Center for Interdisciplinary Economics (CIW).
    11. Qin, Jie, 2015. "A model of regret, investor behavior, and market turbulence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 150-174.
    12. Richard Nielsen, 2013. "Whistle-Blowing Methods for Navigating Within and Helping Reform Regulatory Institutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 385-395, February.
    13. Julia, Knolle, 2014. "An Empirical Comparison of Interest and Growth Rates," MPRA Paper 59520, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Paul de Grauwe, 2013. "Design Failures in the Eurozone: Can they be fixed?," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 57, European Institute, LSE.
    15. German Forero-Laverde, 2016. "Are All Booms and Busts Created Equal? A New Methodology for Understanding Bull and Bear Stock Markets," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2016/339, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    16. Ulrich van Suntum, "undated". "Economic Confidence, Negative Interest Rates, and Liquidity: Towards Keynesianism 2.0," Working Papers 200108, Institute of Spatial and Housing Economics, Munster Universitary.
    17. Rungcharoenkitkul, Phurichai, 2005. "Coordination failure cycle," MPRA Paper 37970, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Mar 2012.
    18. Alberto Russo & Luca Riccetti & Mauro Gallegati, 2016. "Increasing inequality, consumer credit and financial fragility in an agent based macroeconomic model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 25-47, March.
    19. Omokolade Akinsomi & Yener Coskun & Rangan Gupta & Chi Keung Marco Lau, 2016. "Impact of Volatility and Equity Market Uncertainty on Herd Behavior: Evidence from UK REITs," Working Papers 201688, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    20. Alina Sorescu & Sorin M. Sorescu & Will J. Armstrong & Bart Devoldere, 2018. "Two Centuries of Innovations and Stock Market Bubbles," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 507-529, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2017:i:5:p:6-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.