IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/026034/17010675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Институциональное Усиление: Три Типа Отношений

Author

Listed:
  • ЕРЗНКЯН БАГРАТ АЙКОВИЧ

    (Центральный экономико-математический институт Российской академии наук)

Abstract

В статье освещаются вопросы, связанные с концепцией институционального усиления, ассоциируемой как с эндогенными институциональными изменениями и институциональным воспроизводством, так и с иными институциональными феноменами. Понятие институционального усиления анализируется через призму трех отношений между институтами в диахронии, между институтами и их носителями в синхронии и между контрагентами при выборе ими того или иного типа института в качестве механизма регулирования трансакции. Для характеристики первого типа отношений используются понятия институционального усиления и квазипараметров эндогенно меняющихся параметров бесконечно повторяющейся игры, напрямую не обусловливающих поведение игроков. Вызываемые институтами изменения квазипараметров могут их усилить или ослабить. Усиление относится к случаю, когда изменения квазипараметров приводят к самоподдерживающемуся поведению. Для характеристики второго типа отношений вводится разграничение между стандартным типом агента мотивированным на достижение экономических целей «человеком экономическим» и вводимым в качестве альтернативы типом, известным как «человек институциональный», действующим под влиянием институтов и мотивированным на изменение своего институционального положения. Необходимость в обращении к третьему типу отношений возникает в ситуации институционального выбора, когда экономические агенты оказываются перед дилеммой, какой из институтов или какую их комбинацию предпочесть в качестве механизма осуществления трансакции. Примерами такого выбора служат формальные институциональные механизмы контрактов и неформальные доверия, могущие при их совместном использовании как усилить, так и ослабить взаимоотношения контрагентов. Особенности институционального усиления во всех типах отношений обсуждаются применительно к стационарной и нестационарной экономике, имея в виду, прежде всего, нестационарную экономику России.

Suggested Citation

  • Ерзнкян Баграт Айкович, 2017. "Институциональное Усиление: Три Типа Отношений," Journal of Institutional Studies Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований), CyberLeninka;Общество с ограниченной ответственностью «Гуманитарные перспективы», vol. 9(1), pages 27-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:026034:17010675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/institutsionalnoe-usilenie-tri-tipa-otnosheniy
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greif, Avner & Laitin, David D., 2004. "A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(4), pages 633-652, November.
    2. Greif, Avner, 1994. "Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(5), pages 912-950, October.
    3. Masahiko Aoki, 2001. "Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262011875, December.
    4. A.Y. Arkhipov & B.H. Yerznkyan & E.M. Martishin, 2015. "Anatomy of the “Economic Miracleâ€," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 7-20.
    5. Veselin Draskovic & Mimo Draskovic, 2012. "Institutional Nihilism As A Basis For Anti-Development Policy," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 8(1), pages 119-136.
    6. Christopher J. Coyne & Peter T. Leeson, 2009. "Media as a Mechanism of Institutional Change and Reinforcement," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 1-14, February.
    7. L. Polishchuk., 2008. "Misuse of Institutions: Its Causes and Consequences," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Asoni, 2008. "Protection Of Property Rights And Growth As Political Equilibria," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 953-987, December.
    2. Cecchi, Francesco & Melesse, Mequanint Biset, 2016. "Formal law and customary change: A lab-in-field experiment in Ethiopia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 67-85.
    3. Platteau, Jean-Philippe & Gaspart, Frederic, 2003. "The Risk of Resource Misappropriation in Community-Driven Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1687-1703, October.
    4. Polishchuk, Leonid, 2010. "Misuse of Institutions: Lessons from Transition," WIDER Working Paper Series 075, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Humphreys, Macartan & Sánchez de la Sierra, Raúl & Van der Windt, Peter, 2019. "Exporting democratic practices: Evidence from a village governance intervention in Eastern Congo," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 279-301.
    6. Okazaki, Tetsuji, 2005. "The role of the merchant coalition in pre-modern Japanese economic development: an historical institutional analysis," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 184-201, April.
    7. Licht, Amir N. & Goldschmidt, Chanan & Schwartz, Shalom H., 2007. "Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 659-688, December.
    8. Nunn, Nathan & Trefler, Daniel, 2014. "Domestic Institutions as a Source of Comparative Advantage," Handbook of International Economics, in: Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 0, pages 263-315, Elsevier.
    9. Greif, Avner & Tadelis, Steven, 2010. "A theory of moral persistence: Crypto-morality and political legitimacy," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 229-244, September.
    10. Diego Puga & Daniel Trefler, 2014. "International Trade and Institutional Change: Medieval Venice’s Response to Globalization," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(2), pages 753-821.
    11. repec:zbw:inwedp:702017 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Caballero, Gonzalo, 2015. "Community-based forest management institutions in the Galician communal forests: A new institutional approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 347-356.
    13. Teodor Sedlarski, 2012. "Institutional strengthening of the free market in the new economic history," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 83-109.
    14. Gagliardi, Francesca, 2008. "Institutions and economic change: A critical survey of the new institutional approaches and empirical evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 416-443, February.
    15. Brousseau, Eric & Garrouste, Pierre & Raynaud, Emmanuel, 2011. "Institutional changes: Alternative theories and consequences for institutional design," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 79(1-2), pages 3-19, June.
    16. Art Carden & Christopher Coyne, 2013. "The political economy of the Reconstruction Era’s race riots," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 57-71, October.
    17. Licht Amir N., 2008. "Social Norms and the Law: Why Peoples Obey the Law," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 715-750, December.
    18. Lin, Wanlin & Lin, George C.S., 2023. "Strategizing actors and agents in the functioning of informal property Rights: The tragicomedy of the extralegal housing market in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Haifei Wang & Hongjun Wu & Peter Humphreys, 2022. "Chinese Merchant Group Culture, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Cost of Debt: Evidence from Private Listed Firms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Mengzhu Zhang & Shenjing He, 2020. "Informal Property Rights as Relational and Functional: Unravelling the Relational Contract in China's Informal Housing Market," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 967-988, November.
    21. Harbi, Sana El & Anderson, Alistair R., 2010. "Institutions and the shaping of different forms of entrepreneurship," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 436-444, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:026034:17010675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CyberLeninka (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cyberleninka.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.