IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/ejafbu/v17y2021i27p58-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mediation Role Of Environmental Disclosure In The Relationship Of Firm Performance And Value

Author

Listed:
  • Zirman ZIRMAN

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Riau University)

  • Vera OKTARI

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Riau University)

  • Mayla KHOIRIYAH

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Riau University)

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effect of environmental disclosure in mediating financial performance and environmental performance on firm value. The research plan will be completed on primary and secondary industries listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) using data from the last 5 (five) years. The analysis results show that environmental performance and financial performance have a significant effect on firm value, the environmental performance has a significant effect on environmental disclosure. Meanwhile, environmental exposure and environmental performance have no significant impact on firm value. Environmental performance and financial performance do not mediate environmental exposure through firm value. This statement shows that good economic performance does not encourage companies to make good environmental disclosures because the company's primary focus is financial performance. In addition, environmental disclosure is still voluntary, so there is no obligation for companies to make extensive disclosures regarding their environmental performance. The research results are expected to be an additional reference for academics and researchers regarding the importance of environmental disclosure by companies to improve company performance and value, as well as a further concern for capital market supervisors and regulators regarding company management.

Suggested Citation

  • Zirman ZIRMAN & Vera OKTARI & Mayla KHOIRIYAH, 2021. "Mediation Role Of Environmental Disclosure In The Relationship Of Firm Performance And Value," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 17(27), pages 58-69, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:scm:ejafbu:v:17:y:2021:i:27:p:58-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://accounting-management.ro/getpdf.php?paperid=27_8
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Chang & Wenjing Li & Xiaoyan Lu, 2015. "Government Engagement, Environmental Policy, and Environmental Performance: Evidence from the Most Polluting Chinese Listed Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yousaf, Umair Bin & Ullah, Irfan & Jiang, Junchen & Wang, Man, 2022. "The role of board capital in driving green innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    2. Li, Cunfang & Li, Danping & Zhang, Xiaoxu, 2019. "Why can China's coal resource-exhausted enterprises cross the district to transfer?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 94-105.
    3. Yuxuan Li & Xin Miao & Dequan Zheng & Yanhong Tang, 2019. "Corporate Public Transparency on Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Political Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    4. He, Yiqing & Ding, Xin & Yang, Chuchu, 2021. "Do environmental regulations and financial constraints stimulate corporate technological innovation? Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Michael Yao-Ping Peng & Li Zhang & Meng-Hsiu Lee & Fang-Yih Hsu & Yan Xu & Yuan He, 2024. "The relationship between strategic human resource management, green innovation and environmental performance: a moderated-mediation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Hu, Jun & Wu, Huiying & Ying, Sammy Xiaoyan, 2022. "Environmental regulation, market forces, and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from the implementation of cleaner production standards in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 606-622.
    7. Zhiliang Xu & Changxin Xu & Yun Li, 2023. "Green Credit Policy, Environmental Investment, and Green Innovation: Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Ying Song & Lu Yang & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal & Charles Chen, 2023. "Analyzing the Role of High-Tech Industrial Agglomeration in Green Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Industry: the Case of China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 3847-3877, December.
    9. Tsambou André Dumas & Fomba Kamga Benjamin, 2023. "Adoption des Politiques de Protection de l'Environnement et performance des Entreprises Camerounaises," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 71(1), pages 89-117, March.
    10. Chang Huang & Xiao Chang & Yang Wang & Nicolas Li, 2023. "Do major customers encourage innovative sustainable development? Empirical evidence from corporate green innovation in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 163-184, January.
    11. Fawad Rauf & Cosmina Lelia Voinea & Hammad Bin Azam Hashmi & Cosmin Fratostiteanu, 2020. "Moderating Effect of Political Embeddedness on the Relationship between Resources Base and Quality of CSR Disclosure in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Qiang Li & Wenjuan Ruan & Tiantian Sun & Erwei Xiang, 2020. "Corporate governance and corporate environmental investments: Evidence from China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(6), pages 923-942, September.
    13. Faizul Haque & Collins G. Ntim, 2022. "Do corporate sustainability initiatives improve corporate carbon performance? Evidence from European firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3318-3334, November.
    14. Chen Hu & Yanan Li & Penghao Ye, 2023. "The Halo Effect of Government: Does State-Owned Capital Promote the Green Innovation of Chinese Private Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Zhang, Weike & Luo, Qian & Liu, Shiyuan, 2022. "Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 105-121.
    16. Zhenyu Jiang & Zongjun Wang & Yanqi Zeng, 2020. "Can voluntary environmental regulation promote corporate technological innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 390-406, February.
    17. Yasir Shahab & Collins G. Ntim & Yugang Chen & Farid Ullah & Hai‐Xia Li & Zhiwei Ye, 2020. "Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: New insights from upper echelons perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Xue Yang & Yuandi Wang & Die Hu & Yongqiang Gao, 2018. "How industry peers improve your sustainable development? The role of listed firms in environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1313-1333, December.
    19. Li, Quan & Chen, Yang & Wan, Mengfei, 2023. "The impact of central environmental inspection on institutional ownership: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    20. Pingguo Xu & Leyi Chen & Huajuan Dai, 2022. "Pathways to Sustainable Development: Corporate Digital Transformation and Environmental Performance in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ejafbu:v:17:y:2021:i:27:p:58-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.