IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i9p1859-1874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatially integrated and socially segregated: The effects of mixed-income neighbourhoods on social well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Amie Thurber

    (Human and Organizational Development Department, Vanderbilt University, USA)

  • Claire Riehle Bohmann

    (Human and Organizational Development Department, Vanderbilt University, USA)

  • Craig Anne Heflinger

    (Human and Organizational Development Department, Vanderbilt University, USA)

Abstract

Mixed-income development is the latest in a long line of policy interventions to improve outcomes in distressed urban neighbourhoods, particularly as an alternative to large scale public housing projects. Such developments are inherently integrationist, and have profound effects on the social lives and well-being of residents. After situating mixed-income developments within current residential demographic trends with regard to race and income, this article provides a comprehensive review of the 22 empirical studies addressing social integration in mixed-income developments in the United States, focusing on understanding the effects of spatial integration on social well-being. We discuss policy and practice implications to optimise the social well-being of residents, as well as strategies to improve scholarship in these settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Amie Thurber & Claire Riehle Bohmann & Craig Anne Heflinger, 2018. "Spatially integrated and socially segregated: The effects of mixed-income neighbourhoods on social well-being," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(9), pages 1859-1874, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:9:p:1859-1874
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098017702840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017702840
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098017702840?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Garshick Kleit, 2005. "HOPE VI New Communities: Neighborhood Relationships in Mixed-Income Housing," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(8), pages 1413-1441, August.
    2. Erin M. Graves, 2011. "Mixed Outcome Developments," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(2), pages 143-153, April.
    3. Sean F. Reardon & Lindsay Fox & Joseph Townsend, 2015. "Neighborhood Income Composition by Household Race and Income, 1990–2009," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 660(1), pages 78-97, July.
    4. William A. V. Clark & Regan Maas, 2009. "The Geography of a Mixed‐Race Society," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 565-593, December.
    5. S. Michael Gaddis & Raj Ghoshal, 2015. "Arab American Housing Discrimination, Ethnic Competition, and the Contact Hypothesis," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 660(1), pages 282-299, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chu Chu & Rie Nomura & Suguru Mori, 2019. "Actual Conditions of Mixed Public–Private Planning for Housing Complexes in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Shauna Brail & Nishi Kumar, 2017. "Community leadership and engagement after the mix: The transformation of Toronto’s Regent Park," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(16), pages 3772-3788, December.
    3. Lucas Sage & Andreas Flache, 2021. "Can Ethnic Tolerance Curb Self-Reinforcing School Segregation? A Theoretical Agent Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 24(2), pages 1-2.
    4. Mark Joseph & Robert Chaskin, 2010. "Living in a Mixed-Income Development: Resident Perceptions of the Benefits and Disadvantages of Two Developments in Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2347-2366, October.
    5. Evelyn Ravuri, 2023. "Neighbourhood change in Genesee and Kent Counties, Michigan, 1970–2019," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(1), pages 107-127, February.
    6. Jaeger, David A. & Nunley, John M. & Seals, R. Alan & Shandra, Carrie L. & Wilbrandt, Eric J., 2023. "The demand for interns," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 372-390.
    7. Galster, George & Andersson, Roger & Musterd, Sako & Kauppinen, Timo M., 2008. "Does neighborhood income mix affect earnings of adults? New evidence from Sweden," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 858-870, May.
    8. William AV Clark & John Östh, 2018. "Measuring isolation across space and over time with new tools: Evidence from Californian metropolitan regions," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1038-1054, November.
    9. Shin Bin Tan, 2023. "Do ethnic integration policies also improve socio-economic integration? A study of residential segregation in Singapore," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(4), pages 696-717, March.
    10. Justin T. Huang & Masha Krupenkin & David Rothschild & Julia Lee Cunningham, 2023. "The cost of anti-Asian racism during the COVID-19 pandemic," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 682-695, May.
    11. Stephen L. Ross, 2009. "Social Interactions within Cities: Neighborhood Environments and Peer Relationships," Working papers 2009-31, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    12. Fenne M. Pinkster, 2014. "Neighbourhood Effects as Indirect Effects: Evidence from a Dutch Case Study on the Significance of Neighbourhood for Employment Trajectories," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2042-2059, November.
    13. Kipnis, Eva & Broderick, Amanda J. & Demangeot, Catherine & Adkins, Natalie Ross & Ferguson, Nakeisha S. & Henderson, Geraldine Rosa & Johnson, Guillaume & Mandiberg, James M. & Mueller, Rene Dentiste, 2013. "Branding beyond prejudice: Navigating multicultural marketplaces for consumer well-being," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1186-1194.
    14. Leccis, Francesca, 2019. "Regeneration programmes: Enforcing the right to housing or fostering gentrification? The example of Bankside in London," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Chris Graziul & Alexander Belikov & Ishanu Chattopadyay & Ziwen Chen & Hongbo Fang & Anuraag Girdhar & Xiaoshuang Jia & P. M. Krafft & Max Kleiman-Weiner & Candice Lewis & Chen Liang & John Muchovej &, 2023. "Does big data serve policy? Not without context. An experiment with in silico social science," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 188-219, March.
    16. Chinyere O. Agbai, 2023. "The Structure of Pandemic Vulnerability: Housing Wealth, Residential Segregation, and COVID-19 Mortality," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(5), pages 1-30, October.
    17. LaBrenz, Catherine A. & Littleton, Tenesha & Shipe, Stacey L. & Bai, Rong & Stargel, Lauren, 2023. "State policies on child maltreatment and racial disproportionality," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    18. April Jackson, 2020. "Three Local Organizing Strategies to Implement Place-Based School Integration Initiatives in a Mixed-Income Community," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Jeongseob Kim & Kristin Larsen, 2017. "Can new urbanism infill development contribute to social sustainability? The case of Orlando, Florida," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(16), pages 3843-3862, December.
    20. Sohrab Rahimi & Michael J. R. Martin & Eric Obeysekere & Daniel Hellmann & Xi Liu & Clio Andris, 2017. "A Geographic Information System (GIS)-Based Analysis of Social Capital Data: Landscape Factors That Correlate with Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:9:p:1859-1874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.