IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v52y2015i14p2599-2615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The tension between choice and need in the housing of newcomers: A theoretical framework and an application on Scandinavian settlement policies

Author

Listed:
  • Karin Borevi

    (Uppsala University, Sweden)

  • Bo Bengtsson

    (Uppsala University, Sweden)

Abstract

The settlement and housing of refugees is high on the agenda in most European countries. This article develops a theoretical perspective on the housing provision of newly arrived migrants and applies it on the national discourses on settlement policies in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. The theoretical discussion focuses on the ambivalence between choice and need in housing policy, and between promoting demos and ethnos in integration policy. The empirical analysis takes its departure in these tensions and investigates the national discourses in terms of three potential arguments for restricting autonomy in the housing market precisely for newly arrived migrants: the legal status, resource and neighbourhood arguments. This frame of analysis makes it possible to interpret and understand the surprisingly strong differences in settlement policies between the three countries. We argue that our theoretical approach and analytical framework should be relevant for understanding national political discourses on settlement policy more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Karin Borevi & Bo Bengtsson, 2015. "The tension between choice and need in the housing of newcomers: A theoretical framework and an application on Scandinavian settlement policies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(14), pages 2599-2615, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:14:p:2599-2615
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098014548137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098014548137
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098014548137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sainsbury, Diane, 2012. "Welfare States and Immigrant Rights: The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199654789.
    2. Hoogerwerf, Andries, 1990. "Reconstructing policy theory," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 285-291, January.
    3. Deborah Mabbett, 2005. "The Development of Rights‐based Social Policy in the European Union: The Example of Disability Rights," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 97-120, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matz Dahlberg & Madhinee Valeyatheepillay, 2019. "On the Anatomy of a Refugee Dispersal Policy: Neighborhood Integration and Dynamic Sorting," ifo Working Paper Series 285, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Frith, 2008. "Cosmopolitan Democracy and the EU: The Case of Gender," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(1), pages 215-236, March.
    2. Tim Benijts, 2014. "A Business Sustainability Model for Government Corporations. A Belgian Case Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 204-216, March.
    3. Marie-Agnès Détourbe & Gaële Goastellec, 2018. "Revisiting the Issues of Access to Higher Education and Social Stratification through the Case of Refugees: A Comparative Study of Spaces of Opportunity for Refugee Students in Germany and England," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Younsook Yeo, 2017. "Healthcare inequality issues among immigrant elders after neoliberal welfare reform: empirical findings from the United States," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(5), pages 547-565, June.
    5. Cecilia Bruzelius & Constantin Reinprecht & Martin Seeleib-Kaiser, 2017. "Stratified Social Rights Limiting EU Citizenship," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1239-1253, November.
    6. Tim Benijts, 2009. "Sustainable investment funds and the government: a comparative study on public policies in the Netherlands and Belgium," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 11(6), pages 1155-1174, December.
    7. Marleen Kerkhof, 2006. "Making a difference: On the constraints of consensus building and the relevance of deliberation in stakeholder dialogues," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 39(3), pages 279-299, September.
    8. Mojca Pajnik, 2016. "‘Wasted precariat’: Migrant work in European societies," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(2), pages 159-172, April.
    9. Nicole Lindstrom, 2010. "Service Liberalization in the Enlarged EU: A Race to the Bottom or the Emergence of Transnational Political Conflict?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 1307-1327, November.
    10. Peter O'Brien, 2019. "Bordering in Europe: Differential Inclusion," Border Crossing, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 9(1), pages 43-62, January-J.
    11. Martijn Mos, 2014. "Of Gay Rights and Christmas Ornaments: The Political History of Sexual Orientation Non-discrimination in the Treaty of Amsterdam," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 632-649, May.
    12. Eefje Cuppen, 2012. "Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(1), pages 23-46, March.
    13. Johanna K Schenner & Anders Neergaard, 2019. "Éditorial," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 25(1), pages 6-8, February.
    14. C. E. Jager, 2017. "A Question of Trust: the Pursuit of Consumer Trust in the Financial Sector by Means of EU Legislation," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 25-49, March.
    15. Iván González-Márquez & Víctor M. Toledo, 2020. "Sustainability Science: A Paradigm in Crisis?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Vermeulen, W.J.V. & Kok, M.T.J., 2012. "Government interventions in sustainable supply chain governance: Experience in Dutch front-running cases," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 183-196.
    17. Huub Ploegmakers & Pascal Beckers, 2015. "Evaluating urban regeneration: An assessment of the effectiveness of physical regeneration initiatives on run-down industrial sites in the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2151-2169, September.
    18. Diedrich, Andreas, 2017. "Validation of immigrants’ prior foreign learning as a framing practice," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 729-736.
    19. Nicole Lindstrom, 2010. "Service Liberalization in the Enlarged EU: A Race to the Bottom or the Emergence of Transnational Political Conflict?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 1307-1327, November.
    20. Isabel Shutes, 2022. "Immigration Policies and the Risks of Single Parenthood for Migrant Women," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 702(1), pages 149-162, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:14:p:2599-2615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.